Actuaries body calls for new pension option
Wednesday 02 January 2008
Latest in Business News
On Facebook
The Government should allow employers a new option for their pension schemes to address a shortfall of contributions into defined contribution plans, the Association of Consulting Actuaries has said.
ACA's survey of pension trends found that four out of five company-run defined benefit or final salary pension schemes were closed to new entrants, up from seven out of 10 three years ago. Only about 900,000 private sector workers are in final salary schemes open to new entrants compared with more than 5 million in the public sector.
Employers and employees have contributed record levels into final salary schemes to eliminate deficits and meet future costs. But contributions into defined contribution schemes that have replaced many final salary plans are about a third of those into final salary schemes, ACA said.
ACA said the low contribution levels, coupled with rising annuity costs and volatile markets, were a growing concern. With many employers considering closing their final salary schemes to new entrants and existing employees, the Government should lift a ban on employers offering conditionally indexed pension schemes, the association said.
Conditionally indexed schemes provide a "middle way" between final salary schemes and defined contribution plans, ACA said. The schemes, which are the main type used in the Netherlands, link the level of pension to average career earnings and have fewer constraints on investment strategy. The key difference is pensions would be indexed, but with annual increases conditional on the scheme's financial health.
Ian Farr, ACA chairman, said: "Most private sector defined benefit schemes are closed to new entrants and there is mounting evidence of closures affecting existing members. If the current legislative opportunity is lost, we will see over the next few years a dangerous gulf growing in provision between those working in the private and public sectors, a gulf that we believe will be seen as unsustainable."
The Government's Pensions Bill, which seeks to address the "time bomb" of inadequate pension contributions, is set for its second reading on 7 January. Its main feature is the introduction of personal accounts, which employers and employees must pay into unless the employee opts out.
ACA said it welcomed personal accounts but warned they could lead to a "levelling down" of pension contributions.
- 1 Vatican told to pay taxes as Italy tackles budget crisis
- 2 Pete Doherty: I was a bit unhinged
- 3 Rothschild loses libel case, and reveals secret world of money and politics
- 4 Greeks rage at erosion of sovereignty while leaders haggle over deal
- 5 Swiss to launch a space 'janitor'
- 6 Energy watchdog tells big firms: cut prices or else
- 7 Hey, You've got to hide your drug away
- 1 Rothschild loses libel case, and reveals secret world of money and politics
- 2 Vatican told to pay taxes as Italy tackles budget crisis
- 3 The West Bank's Bobby Sands
- 4 Prehistoric cybermen? Sardinia's lost warriors rise from the dust
- 5 Spotify: 1 million plays, £108 return
- 6 Female teachers accused of giving boys lower marks
- 7 The artist vandalising advertising with poetry
- 8 Apple admits it has a human rights problem
- 9 Mark Steel: If religion is 'marginal', I'm the Pope
- 10 Can you master a language in a weekend?
Free trial of new Independent iPad app
Get your daily dose of the best of British journalism, sponsored by American Airlines
Amazing restaurant offers
Three glasses of free champagne and a special menu at 46 top London restaurants.
Latest Independent competitions
Win anything from gadgets to five-star holidays on our competitions and offers page.
Commercial thought leaders
Watch the best in the business world give their insights into the world of business.
Career Services
Day In a Page
Wilderness and wildlife in Australia’s Top End
48 Hours: Marrakech
Bear with Bern for Swiss skiing
The West Bank's Bobby Sands
A very good cuppa: Restaurants embrace afternoon tea tradition




Comments