Angry investors call for heads of Lloyds bosses
City investors will heap further pressure on Sir Victor Blank and Eric Daniels to step down as chairman and chief executive of Lloyds Banking group this week after the taxpayer was forced to take a 65 per cent controlling stake in the bank yesterday.
After days of negotiations between Lloyds' management and Treasury officials, a deal allowing the bank to dump £260bn in toxic assets into a Government-backed insurance scheme was finally thrashed out.
Under the deal, the Government forces Lloyds to commit to £28bn in new lending over the next two years, while officials from the Government's UK Financial Investments arm, created to look after government bank stakes, will increase their presence on the board.
Lloyds is paying a fee to the Treasury of £15.6bn to take part in the Asset Protection Scheme.
But diluted equity investors in the Square Mile have been quick to vent their anger and are now calling for Sir Victor and Mr Daniels to quit.
"Their positions are untenable," said one leading investor. "Shareholders want blood. The perception is that Daniels, though clearly culpable, was caught in the middle. This was very much Blank's deal and I think he should go."
Despite the swelling City frustration, sources close to Lloyds say that neither Sir Victor nor Mr Daniels, would quit.
"We understand what the City is saying and I'm sure we'll have to experience some short-term anger, but their cries are rather academic," said the source. "Gordon Brown and the Government are backing the management. That's that."
The source said that Sir Victor, 66, remained "keen to see this thing through. Nobody wanted things to come to this but they have. We are now in the eye of the storm."
In January, Sir Victor said that Lloyds would continue to resist government control: "We can probably conduct our business better than the Government can conduct it for us."
John McFall MP, the chairman of the Treasury Select Committee, said he would be watching Lloyds to ensure that it meets its new lending requirement.
"We will be periodically monitoring that the lending is actually happening," he said. "Lloyds was actually run pretty conservatively, but the HBOS merger has been its downfall. However, there are synergies, and I would urge the market to take a long-term view of the bank's prospects," he added.
Michael Fallon, the Tory deputy chairman of the committee, said: "This is Brown's mistake. He was the one who changed the law. This [Lloyds –HBOS deal] is the most expensive cocktail party in history."
View all comments that have been posted about this article.
Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.
- Print Article
- Email Article
-
Click here for copyright permissions
Copyright 2009 Independent News and Media Limited


Comments
That seems to be the popular punishment for senior bankers that totally cock things up.
Of course I suppose it is too much to expect the shareholders to reflect on why they voted for the merger deal with HBoS. Presumably because they thought it would be a good investment and give them a healthy profit. The fact that has not transpired is as much there fault for agreeing to it as it is the head honchos at the bank
Can you imagin that in 1975 we could of worked for a cleaner and safer city and planet. While Wrren and Sir Victor stach almost 10% of There money into BYD.FF now about 2 bucks a share. You don't have to believe me follow the money is the best. Mr. Madoff and friends also have a large share in this China based company and I've not been on a through enough track to lace him to Sir Victor and Mr. Daniels. (Mercer, Callagan Investments got how much of your money?)
So out they should go and no chance of goverment work again what so ever. The BYD.FF stands for
Build Your Dreams.FF/ Freeze there off shore accounts and review what is visable to property owned.
Long Live The Queen.
Mr. RW Kent