Bank break-up threat could hit Government's stakes in RBS and Lloyds
Monday 04 February 2013
Chancellor George Osborne’s decision to threaten UK banks with break-up if they fail to meet rules to make them safer could make it harder for the Government to sell its huge stakes in Royal Bank of Scotland and Lloyds, experts warned today.
At one stage the Treasury hoped it could start selling shares in RBS, where it has an 83% stake, and Lloyds, where it has 41%, before the next General Election in May 2015. The taxpayer was briefly — at the end of 2010 and start of 2011 — sitting on a small profit on the £45 billion and £20 billion pumped into RBS and Lloyds respectively in 2008. But since Sir John Vickers’ Independent Commission on Banking published its interim report suggesting “ring-fencing” of retail banks from investment banks, the shares have stayed below the price paid by the taxpayer.
Osborne’s speech today and publication of the Banking Reform Bill have “muddied the waters yet again” according to one senior banker.
“The ‘high stakes’ approach now being introduced to the ring-fence measures presumably will make it difficult for the Government to decide the optimum time to reduce their current holdings in UK banks,” said, Tony Anderson, banking partner and head of financial products at legal firm Pinsent Masons. “There could be significant political fallout for the Government from any proximity between a sell down of shares in a state-owned bank and a full separation of banking operations following a breach of the ring-fencing measures.”
David Buik of Cantor Index pointed out that ring-fencing would not have prevented either the UK bailouts or Lehman Brothers collapse in 2008.
He said: “It was injudicious lending and poor credit analysis that led to the crisis. It was Northern Rock, Bradford & Bingley, HBOS and Lloyds that were the major transgressors. Not those with investment banks.”
International regulators also questioned the need for ring-fencing over strengthened balance sheets.
“Higher capital and liquidity requirements are more important for stabilising banks than the separation of proprietary trading and deposit-taking business,” said Jaime Caruana of the Bank for International Settlements.
- 1 What happens to your body when you give up sugar?
- 2 Licence fee: What is the BBC charge – and how will the changes affect you?
- 3 This is what the photographer has to say about the picture of a weasel riding a woodpecker
- 4 Delhi bus rapist blames dead victim for attack because 'girls are responsible for rape'
- 5 Have sex with your iPad thanks to the new sex toy no-one asked for
Bill Clinton portrait features Monica Lewinsky reference, artist admits
Japanese island overrun with cats after population explodes
Delhi bus rapist blames dead victim for attack because 'girls are responsible for rape'
Pornhub turns masturbation into energy in bid to save the planet
The 'sex selfie stick' lets you FaceTime the inside of a vagina
'Jihadi John': CAGE representative storms off Sky News accusing Kay Burley of Islamophobia
Durham Free School: 'Creationism taught at' free school facing closure
Ukip would cut billions from Scottish budget to fund English tax cuts
Nearly 100,000 of Britain's poorest children go hungry after parents' benefits are cut
End of the licence fee: BBC to back radical overhaul of how it is funded
Ukraine crisis: Top Chinese diplomat backs Putin and says West should 'abandon zero-sum mentality'
iJobs Money & Business
£15000 - £18000 per annum: Recruitment Genius: This is a great opportunity for...
£50000 - £60000 per annum + Excellent Salary: Austen Lloyd: An outstanding new...
£20000 - £21000 per annum + uncapped commission: SThree: As a graduate you are...
£25000 - £30000 per annum + benefits: Ashdown Group: A global leader operating...