Bank break-up threat could hit Government's stakes in RBS and Lloyds
Monday 04 February 2013
Chancellor George Osborne’s decision to threaten UK banks with break-up if they fail to meet rules to make them safer could make it harder for the Government to sell its huge stakes in Royal Bank of Scotland and Lloyds, experts warned today.
At one stage the Treasury hoped it could start selling shares in RBS, where it has an 83% stake, and Lloyds, where it has 41%, before the next General Election in May 2015. The taxpayer was briefly — at the end of 2010 and start of 2011 — sitting on a small profit on the £45 billion and £20 billion pumped into RBS and Lloyds respectively in 2008. But since Sir John Vickers’ Independent Commission on Banking published its interim report suggesting “ring-fencing” of retail banks from investment banks, the shares have stayed below the price paid by the taxpayer.
Osborne’s speech today and publication of the Banking Reform Bill have “muddied the waters yet again” according to one senior banker.
“The ‘high stakes’ approach now being introduced to the ring-fence measures presumably will make it difficult for the Government to decide the optimum time to reduce their current holdings in UK banks,” said, Tony Anderson, banking partner and head of financial products at legal firm Pinsent Masons. “There could be significant political fallout for the Government from any proximity between a sell down of shares in a state-owned bank and a full separation of banking operations following a breach of the ring-fencing measures.”
David Buik of Cantor Index pointed out that ring-fencing would not have prevented either the UK bailouts or Lehman Brothers collapse in 2008.
He said: “It was injudicious lending and poor credit analysis that led to the crisis. It was Northern Rock, Bradford & Bingley, HBOS and Lloyds that were the major transgressors. Not those with investment banks.”
International regulators also questioned the need for ring-fencing over strengthened balance sheets.
“Higher capital and liquidity requirements are more important for stabilising banks than the separation of proprietary trading and deposit-taking business,” said Jaime Caruana of the Bank for International Settlements.
- 1 If you weren't afraid of flying before last week... you probably are now
- 2 Israel-Gaza conflict: The secret report that helps Israelis to hide facts
- 3 Students offered grants if they tweet pro-Israeli propaganda
- 4 Lauren Goodger calls for tougher laws on revenge porn after sex tape leaks online
- 5 Iraq crisis: End 'very near' for Christianity after Isis takeover, says Bishop
Israel-Gaza conflict: The secret report that helps Israelis to hide facts
A day in the life of Vladimir Putin: The dictator in his labyrinth
Opponents of Israel's military operation in Gaza are the real enemies of Middle Eastern peace
Were 'Poor Doors' added to mixed developments so wealthy residents don't have to go in alongside social housing tenants?
Arizona execution lasts two hours as killer Joseph Wood left 'snorting and gasping' for air
Malaysia Airlines MH17 crash: Massive rise in sale of British arms to Russia
iJobs Money & Business
£40000 - £45000 per annum: Ashdown Group: An established professional services...
£600 - £650 per day: Orgtel: Conduct Risk Liaison Manager - Banking - London -...
£18000 - £23000 per annum + Comission: SThree: SThree, International Recruitme...
£280 - £300 per day + competitive: Orgtel: Test Analyst, Edinburgh, Credit Ris...