Blow for tobacco industry over ad ruling
Saturday 06 November 2004
The tobacco industry yesterday suffered a court defeat over new restrictions on cigarette advertising in shops, pubs and clubs, after a judge threw out its claim that the rules were unlawful and a breach of their human rights.
Mr Justice McCombe, a High Court judge, told the group of tobacco companies, which includes British American Tobacco, Imperial Tobacco, Gallaher and Philip Morris, that the Government's new rules restricting advertising at point-of-sale were fair and justified.
The group had claimed the rules, which insist that advertisements in shops and on vending machines are no bigger than the size of an A5 sheet of paper, (of which 30 per cent must be a health warning), were a breach of their right to "freedom of expression" under the European Convention on Human Rights.
Lawyers argued that the restrictions, due to begin next month, prevent companies from making meaningful or effective communication with adult smokers and do not allow smokers to receive a reasonable level of information about legally available products before they buy.
They also claimed that the Government had not assessed carefully enough whether less severe regulations would be as effective. The companies told the court that as a result of the rules, they could not introduce new products.
But the judge dismissed their arguments, saying the restrictions were "directed at an acknowledged serious risk to health and the need for public protection against that risk". "Given the health risks and economic costs to society caused by smoking and a substantial weight of expert opinion as to the effects of advertising, I believe it to have been a proportionate step," he said.
The judge gave the companies leave to appeal, however. A spokesman for Imperial Tobacco said the industry had not yet decided whether to challenge the ruling. "We are obviously disappointed. It is our view that the laws are disproportionate and restrict our commercial freedom to communicate with our customers," he said.
Anti-smoking campaigners said a tobacco industry challenge would only waste more public funds. "The tobacco industry has a track record of issuing challenges on questionable grounds which waste huge amounts of time and taxpayers' money in defending them," said Deborah Arnott, a director of Ash.
- 1 Raif Badawi, the Saudi Arabian blogger sentenced to 1,000 lashes, may now face death penalty
- 2 PornHub turns masturbation into energy in bid to save the planet
- 3 Robert Mugabe eats a zoo for 'obscene' 91st birthday party
- 4 The remarkable archaeological underwater discovery that could open up a new chapter in the study of European and British prehistory
- 5 The jihadi girls who went to Syria weren't just radicalised by Isis — they were groomed
Stephen Hawking's wife Jane Wilde on their marriage breakdown: 'The family were left behind'
Raif Badawi, the Saudi Arabian blogger sentenced to 1,000 lashes, may now face death penalty
Someone has actually got a tattoo of that dress
PornHub turns masturbation into energy in bid to save the planet
White and gold or blue and black – what colour is the dress? An eyewitness gives a definitive answer
New theory could prove how life began and disprove God
This is what it's like to be dead, according to a guy who died for a bit
'Jihadi John': CAGE representative storms off Sky News accusing Kay Burley of Islamophobia
Ukip would cut billions from Scottish budget to fund English tax cuts
Russia's roadmap for annexing eastern Ukraine 'leaked from Vladimir Putin's office'
Ukraine crisis: Top Chinese diplomat backs Putin and says West should 'abandon zero-sum mentality'
iJobs Money & Business
£22000 per annum + pension,bonus,career progression: Ashdown Group: An establi...
£40000 - £50000 per annum + pro rata: SThree: SThree Group have been well esta...
£30000 - £37000 per annum: Recruitment Genius: Established in 1999, a highly r...
£250-£300 Day Rate: Jemma Gent: Are you a qualified accountant with strong exp...