BoE awarded £73m costs in BCCI 'farce'
The Bank of England was awarded costs of £73.6m yesterday from Deloitte, the liquidator of the collapsed Bank of Credit and Commerce International.
The settlement drew a line under one of the most protracted and costly battles in legal history, described by the case judge as a "farce" that should never have come to court.
The BoE had sought even more from Deloitte to cover the costs of the 12-year case, but that would have delayed any settlement still further.
In November, the liquidator dropped an £850m lawsuit - the first to be brought against the central bank - after two years in court and a dozen years of litigation.
Lawyers for Deloitte argued that the BoE knowingly failed to protect more than 6,500 depositors, who lost their savings after the world's biggest bank fraud precipitated BCCI's collapse in 1991 with debts of more than $16bn (£8.6bn).
By the time the case collapsed, 42 officials at the BoE were accused of dishonesty, including claims that some had misled Parliament.
A spokesman for the BoE said yesterday: "This is an excellent result which allows us to draw a final line under the BCCI case. Without this settlement, there could have been several years of assessment hearings which would have added millions more in costs."
In 1980, the BoE granted BCCI a licence to operate in London but undertook no supervision because the lender was registered in Luxembourg.
The length of the opening speeches made legal history. The case itself, heard at the Royal Courts of Justice in London, became so complex that counsel for each side were separated by a stack of papers five feet high known as the "Berlin Wall". Judge Stephen Tomlinson, who presided over the case, described it as a farce that could have tarnished the British legal system.
In April, he issued an 86-page judgment in which he said that the case had concerned him so much that he warned the Lord Chief Justice.
Judge Tomlinson wrote: "The case was a farce... the case as it was being pursued before me bore little or no relation to that which the House of Lords had considered fit to proceed to trial... I feared that the case had the capacity to damage the reputation of our legal system."
- 1 Nigel Farage: Me vs Russell Brand on Question Time – he's got the chest hair but where are his ideas?
- 2 Harry Potter fans can apply to the Hogwarts-inspired College of Wizardry
- 3 Jessica Chambers: 19-year-old woman 'doused with lighter fluid and burned alive' in the US
- 4 Russell Brand calls Nigel Farage 'poundshop Enoch Powell' in BBC Question Time debate
- 5 Orange Wednesdays are no more
Weather bomb in pictures: Storms cuts power for tens of thousands – and snow is on the way
Jessica Chambers: 19-year-old woman 'doused with lighter fluid and burned alive' in the US
Russell Brand calls Nigel Farage 'poundshop Enoch Powell' in BBC Question Time debate
Russell Brand was rendered speechless on Question Time by this man
Fury at Airbus after it hints the super-jumbo may be mothballed
Disgruntled RBS worker writes hilarious open letter to Russell Brand after anti-capitalist publicity stunt leaves him hungry
Shock poll shows voters believe Ukip is to the left of the Tories
Nigel Farage's approval rating hits 'record low' as popularity suffers in wake of Ukip sex scandal
Nigel Farage defends Kerry Smith 'ch***y' comment: 'If you are going for a Chinese, what do you say you’re going for?'
Ukip candidate jokes about 'shooting peasants' in racist and homophobic rant
Pakistan school attack live: Taliban kill at least 132 children in 'horrifying' massacre
iJobs Money & Business
$200 - $350 per annum: Carlton Senior Appointments: Managing Producer Office...
$125 - $225 per annum: Carlton Senior Appointments: San Fran - Investment Advi...
Up to £70,000 per annum + benefits: Sheridan Maine: Are you a qualified accoun...
Up to £65,000 per annum + benefits: Sheridan Maine: Are you a qualified accoun...