BP on trial over 'broken promises' that led to second oil spill in Alaska
Stephen Foley is a former Associate Business Editor of The Independent, based in New York. He left in August 2012. In a decade at the paper, he covered personal finance, the UK stock market and the pharmaceuticals industry, and had also been the Business section's share tipster. Between arriving with three suitcases in Manhattan in January 2006 and his departure, he witnessed and reported on a great economic boom turning spectacularly to bust. In March 2009, he was named Business and Finance Journalist of the Year at the British Press Awards.
Thursday 01 December 2011
BP could be forced to pay higher penalties over the 2006 Prudhoe Bay oil spill, the worst onshore pipeline leak in Alaska's history, depending on the outcome of a trial under way in Anchorage.
A second spill in the state, in 2009, proves that BP broke its promises to tighten safety procedures, the US government is claiming.
While BP has faced an even bigger financial and legal crisis over last year's Gulf of Mexico oil spill, its earlier problems in Alaska have still not been resolved. A government engineer claimed in court that the oil giant ignored alarms that went off for months which, if checked out, would have prevented the second spill into Alaska's environmentally sensitive frozen wetlands.
Some 13,500 gallons of oil spilled from a ruptured pipeline in November 2009, two years afterBP pleaded guilty to violating the US Clean Water Act at Prudhoe Bay. The Prudhoe Bay spill sent more than 200,000 gallons of crude flooding on to Alaska's north slope, provoking an outcry from environmentalists and disrupting production from the state's largest oil field for several weeks.
BP paid a $20m fine over the incident and was put on criminal probation for three years.
In court papers ahead of the trial, the US government said the 2009 spill was "eerily similar" to the earlier disaster. "BP's 2006 spill was the result of a lack of maintenance and a failure to heed warning alarms indicating that the pipeline was leaking oil," it said. "The 2009 spill vividly demonstrates that BP has not adequately addressed the management and environmental compliance problems that have plagued it for many years."
Matt Goers, an agent for the Environmental Protection Agency, told the court that his investigation into the spill revealed an alarm had gone off 10 times between June 2009 and the spill being discovered that November.
BP says the 2009 spill was an accident rather than the result of negligence. The case is expected to last all week and, if BP loses, the judge could reopen sentencing terms over the earlier spill.
- 1 Jeremy Clarkson 'sees no problem' with his racist language on Top Gear, says BBC
- 2 'Alien thigh bone' on Mars: Excitement from alien hunters at 'evidence' of extraterrestrial life
- 3 Richard Dawkins on babies with Down Syndrome: 'Abort it and try again – it would be immoral to bring it into the world'
- 4 London restaurant 34 creates champagne glass modelled on Kate Moss’ left breast
- 5 ALS ice bucket challenge co-founder Corey Griffin drowns, aged 27
Richard Dawkins on babies with Down Syndrome: 'Abort it and try again – it would be immoral to bring it into the world'
Scottish independence: English people overwhelmingly want Scotland to stay in the UK
Isis threat: Cameron wants an alliance with Iran
Michael Brown shooting: Chaos erupts on the streets of Ferguson after autopsy shows teenager was shot six times – twice in the head
Disgusting, frustrating, but intriguing: how the country really feels about its politicians
Bin bag full of cats' heads discovered near Manchester's Curry Mile
iJobs Money & Business
£30000 - £40000 per annum + benefits+bonus+package: Harrington Starr: C#.NET ...
£20000 - £30000 per annum + benefits+bonus+package: Harrington Starr: Junior D...
£550 - £650 per day: Orgtel: Business Analyst - Traded Credit Risk - Investmen...
£55000 per annum: Harrington Starr: A financial software vendor at the forefro...