Buffett deals out stinging attack on former acolyte
Thursday 28 April 2011
Warren Buffett, the billionaire investment guru, sent a thunderous message to his chief lieutenants last night: deceive me and bring my company into disrepute and I will fire you, humiliate you and perhaps even pursue you in the courts.
Mr Buffett's giant conglomerate, Berkshire Hathaway, issued a damning public attack on the man who had been lined up as his successor, David Sokol, who quit the company last month amid revelations he had bought shares in a firm that Berkshire went on to acquire.
With the issue threatening to overshadow this weekend's annual meeting of Berkshire shareholders, Mr Buffett has published the internal audit committee report into Mr Sokol's actions.
The executive, who has run several of Berkshire's important subsidiaries, bought shares in the chemicals company Lubrizol the day after picking it from a list of potential takeover targets and asking to start talks with its management.
Not only did the share purchases violate Berkshire's ethics code, which is punishable by sacking, but Mr Sokol deceived Mr Buffett and Berkshire's chief financial officer when telling them about his holdings, the committee said.
"His remark to Mr Buffett in January, revealing only that he owned some Lubrizol stock, did not tell Mr Buffett what he needed to know. It implied that Mr Sokol owned the stock before he began considering Lubrizol as an acquisition candidate, when the truth was the reverse."
The committee said it was considering legal action to recover the $3m profit and to make sure it doesn't have to pay Mr Sokol's expenses, should he be charged with any wrongdoing. Mr Sokol has been insisting that there was no connection between his abrupt resignation and the internal furore his share trades had created.
Mr Buffett writes to his executives every two years to tell them: "If it's questionable whether some action is too close to the line, just assume it is outside and forget about it."
And last night, Berkshire's audit committee reiterated that message. "[The company's] instruction to all its representatives to play in the middle of the court is company policy," it said, "not public relations."
- 1 Russell Brand says he will 'probably' give up acting to focus on his revolution
- 2 Watch what happened when food critics were unknowingly served McDonald's
- 3 David Beckham's Haig Club whisky is exactly what’s wrong with the Highlands
- 4 Queen's first tweet: Reply telling Her Majesty to 'f*** off' broadcast on BBC News
- 5 #AskNigelFarage: Twitter starts hilarious Q&A for Ukip leader
Of course, teenage girls need role models – but not like beauty vlogger Zoella
Support for EU membership 'at highest level since 1991' with most Brits wanting to stay 'in'
Tony Blair 'says Ed Miliband will lose 2015 general election'
Thousands with degenerative conditions classified as 'fit to work in future' – despite no possibility of improvement
Putin: The US is to blame for almost all the world's major conflicts
Attacks on 'Ukip Calypso' show how skewed people’s priorities are
iJobs Money & Business
£60000 per annum: Ashdown Group: Compensation and Benefits Manager - Compensat...
£30000 - £35000 Per Annum plus excellent benefits: Clearwater People Solutions...
£24000 - £28000 per annum + bonus & benefits: Ashdown Group: IT Business Syste...
£50000 - £90000 per annum + benefits: Ampersand Consulting LLP: Markit EDM (CA...