Buffett deals out stinging attack on former acolyte
Thursday 28 April 2011
Warren Buffett, the billionaire investment guru, sent a thunderous message to his chief lieutenants last night: deceive me and bring my company into disrepute and I will fire you, humiliate you and perhaps even pursue you in the courts.
Mr Buffett's giant conglomerate, Berkshire Hathaway, issued a damning public attack on the man who had been lined up as his successor, David Sokol, who quit the company last month amid revelations he had bought shares in a firm that Berkshire went on to acquire.
With the issue threatening to overshadow this weekend's annual meeting of Berkshire shareholders, Mr Buffett has published the internal audit committee report into Mr Sokol's actions.
The executive, who has run several of Berkshire's important subsidiaries, bought shares in the chemicals company Lubrizol the day after picking it from a list of potential takeover targets and asking to start talks with its management.
Not only did the share purchases violate Berkshire's ethics code, which is punishable by sacking, but Mr Sokol deceived Mr Buffett and Berkshire's chief financial officer when telling them about his holdings, the committee said.
"His remark to Mr Buffett in January, revealing only that he owned some Lubrizol stock, did not tell Mr Buffett what he needed to know. It implied that Mr Sokol owned the stock before he began considering Lubrizol as an acquisition candidate, when the truth was the reverse."
The committee said it was considering legal action to recover the $3m profit and to make sure it doesn't have to pay Mr Sokol's expenses, should he be charged with any wrongdoing. Mr Sokol has been insisting that there was no connection between his abrupt resignation and the internal furore his share trades had created.
Mr Buffett writes to his executives every two years to tell them: "If it's questionable whether some action is too close to the line, just assume it is outside and forget about it."
And last night, Berkshire's audit committee reiterated that message. "[The company's] instruction to all its representatives to play in the middle of the court is company policy," it said, "not public relations."
- 1 Nigel Farage: Me vs Russell Brand on Question Time – he's got the chest hair but where are his ideas?
- 2 Harry Potter fans can apply to the Hogwarts-inspired College of Wizardry
- 3 Jessica Chambers: 19-year-old woman 'doused with lighter fluid and burned alive' in the US
- 4 Russell Brand calls Nigel Farage 'poundshop Enoch Powell' in BBC Question Time debate
- 5 Orange Wednesdays are no more
Weather bomb in pictures: Storms cuts power for tens of thousands – and snow is on the way
Jessica Chambers: 19-year-old woman 'doused with lighter fluid and burned alive' in the US
Russell Brand calls Nigel Farage 'poundshop Enoch Powell' in BBC Question Time debate
Russell Brand was rendered speechless on Question Time by this man
Fury at Airbus after it hints the super-jumbo may be mothballed
Disgruntled RBS worker writes hilarious open letter to Russell Brand after anti-capitalist publicity stunt leaves him hungry
Nigel Farage's approval rating hits 'record low' as popularity suffers in wake of Ukip sex scandal
Nigel Farage defends Kerry Smith 'ch***y' comment: 'If you are going for a Chinese, what do you say you’re going for?'
Pakistan school attack live: Taliban kill at least 132 children in 'horrifying' massacre
Sony hack: Angelina Jolie branded 'seriously out of her mind' in further embarrassing leaked email saga
Panic Saturday: 13 million Britons spend £1.2bn – while 13 million others across the country live in poverty unable to afford food
iJobs Money & Business
$200 - $350 per annum: Carlton Senior Appointments: Managing Producer Office...
$125 - $225 per annum: Carlton Senior Appointments: San Fran - Investment Advi...
Up to £70,000 per annum + benefits: Sheridan Maine: Are you a qualified accoun...
Up to £65,000 per annum + benefits: Sheridan Maine: Are you a qualified accoun...