Business

Rain (AM and PM) 3° London Hi 9°C / Lo 6°C

Dismissed executive 'warned HBOS of risk'

By Daniel Bentley, Press Association

A former HBOS executive claimed today he was fired after raising concerns that the bank was exposing itself to too much risk.

Paul Moore, who was dismissed as head of group regulatory risk in 2005, told MPs it was obvious then that the bank was "going too fast" but nobody would listen.

In written evidence to the Treasury Select Committee, he insisted the current crisis could have been avoided if there had been adequate systems to hold bank chiefs in check.

"When I was head of group regulatory risk at HBOS, I certainly knew that the bank was going too fast (and told them), had a cultural indisposition to challenge (and told them) and was a serious risk to financial stability (what the FSA call 'maintaining market confidence') and consumer protection (and told them)," he said.

"I told the board they ought to slow down but was prevented from having this properly minuted by the chief financial officer.

"I told them that their sales culture was significantly out of balance with their systems and controls."

Mr Moore held his position at HBOS from 2002 until 2005 - leaving four years prior to its eventual takeover by Lloyds TSB and part-nationalisation.

He was previously a regulation specialist with the financial services firm KPMG.

Mr Moore said that, after suing for unfair dismissal, he received "substantial damages" but was subjected to a "gagging order" preventing him from speaking out.

He had decided to talk publicly about the issue now because, he said, "the public interest demands it".

He went on: "What my personal experience of being on the inside as a risk and compliance manager has shown me is that, whatever the very specific, final and direct causes of the financial crisis, I strongly believe that the real underlying cause of all the problems was simply this - a total failure of all key aspects of governance.

"In my view and from my personal experience at HBOS, all the other specific failures stem from this one primary cause."

Mr Moore said that if there had been strong risk-managers at all of the banks, who could challenge executives without risking their careers, the current crisis would not have occurred.

"Anyone whose eyes were not blinded by money, power and pride, who really looked carefully, knew there was something wrong and that economic growth based almost solely on excessive consumer spending - based on excessive consumer credit based on massively increasing property prices which were caused by the very same excessively easy credit - could only ultimately lead to disaster," he said.

"But sadly, no-one wanted or felt able to speak up for fear of stepping out of line with the rest of the lemmings who were busy organising themselves to run over the edge of the cliff behind the pied piper CEOs and executive teams that were being paid so much to play that tune and take them in that direction."

He added: "The real problem and cause of this crisis was that people were just too afraid to speak up and the balance and separation of powers was just far too weighted in favour of the CEO and their executive."

Post a Comment

View all comments that have been posted about this article.

Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.

Comments

But the FSA was asleep at the wheel
[info]iansmccarthy wrote:
Tuesday, 10 February 2009 at 04:52 pm (UTC)
I agree that the risk compliance officers at the banks were weak but that is why the FSA, and the Bank of England, are even more culpable because they can and should have spoken out.
Hindsight
[info]sim1502 wrote:
Tuesday, 10 February 2009 at 05:32 pm (UTC)
I remember saying the same thing and being ridiculed at work for my views. It was as though the government, newspapers, TV as well as banks were pumping out all this nonsense about property, end of boom and bust and you were ridiculed for speaking against it. Some of the comments were 'it's about supply and demand'. Everyone who was buying property thought their small one bedroom flat in Manchester would be worth over a million pounds. Was it really daft of me to ask where all this money was coming from. There seemed an obsession with interest rates, easy credit. Everyone was enjoying the easy life and had become entrepeneurs, advised by media, government and corrupt banks, financial advisers and estate agents. They are all as bad as each other.
Which Ministers were told
[info]tonyexeter wrote:
Tuesday, 10 February 2009 at 05:40 pm (UTC)
Which Ministers knew about this and why did they not act. Incredible that the government can ignore so many warnings and still escape blame.
Old fashioned honour
[info]leonardo_06 wrote:
Tuesday, 10 February 2009 at 05:57 pm (UTC)
It is a sad reflection of our society that old-fashioned concepts of honour and integrity should cost someone their job. It is a brave soul indeed who speaks out nowadays. What example are we giving our children? Why should any young person take us seriously any more?
Umpteen pepole of all ranks 'warned'
[info]cronyblatcher wrote:
Tuesday, 10 February 2009 at 07:47 pm (UTC)
and were attacked, discredited and vilified for doing so
gags
[info]deeegeee wrote:
Tuesday, 10 February 2009 at 08:48 pm (UTC)
I wonder just how many others were "Paid or blackmailed off"
Qualifications required to be a banker
[info]gerry19 wrote:
Tuesday, 10 February 2009 at 08:55 pm (UTC)
I think we are all to blame ,do we ask our bank what FORMAL qualification do the have .(And are formal qualifications Necessary) .Minimum should be accountancy, then when they err ,this can be formally removed .