FSA chairman Lord Turner sparks debate on tougher punishments for bailout bankers
Tuesday 13 December 2011
Lord Turner, the chairman of the Financial Services Authority (FSA), wants to start a national debate on imposing more punitive measures against bank executives and directors in any future collapse or bailout.
"People want to know why RBS [Royal Bank of Scotland] failed and why no one has been punished," Lord Turner said.
He admitted that the FSA had been "seriously flawed" but claimed it was "very different now."
"The fact that no individual has been found legally responsible for the failure begs the question: if action cannot be taken under existing rules, should not the rules be changed for the future?"
He suggested two ways of doing this:
l a "strict liability" approach, making it more likely a bank failure like RBS's would be followed by successful enforcement actions, including fines and bans;
l an automatic incentives-based approach involving either rules which automatically ban senior executives and directors of failed banks from future positions of responsibility, or major changes to remuneration to ensure a significant proportion of pay is deferred and forfeited in the event of failure.
Lord Turner said: "There are important pros and cons of these different ways forward, and complex and important legal issues which would need to be considered. But by one means or another, there is a strong argument for new rules which ensure that bank executives and boards place greater weight on avoiding failure."
But he cautioned that if new rules went too far "no sane person would ever consider sitting on the board of a bank".
He promised a consultation paper in the new year.
The FSA has been widely criticised because of its failure to take action against all but one of RBS's former directors, including its chief executive, Sir Fred Goodwin.
Lord Turner accepted the report's criticism of the regulator: "The FSA had developed a philosophy and approach to the supervision of high-impact firms, and in particular major banks, which resulted in insufficient challenge to RBS's poor decisions. The FSA's approach reflected widely-held but mistaken assumptions about the stability of financial systems and responded to political pressures for a 'light touch' regulatory regime."
- 2 Harry Potter fans can apply to the Hogwarts-inspired College of Wizardry
- 3 Jessica Chambers: 19-year-old woman 'doused with lighter fluid and burned alive' in the US
- 4 Russell Brand calls Nigel Farage 'poundshop Enoch Powell' in BBC Question Time debate
- 5 Orange Wednesdays are no more
Weather bomb in pictures: Storms cuts power for tens of thousands – and snow is on the way
Jessica Chambers: 19-year-old woman 'doused with lighter fluid and burned alive' in the US
Russell Brand calls Nigel Farage 'poundshop Enoch Powell' in BBC Question Time debate
Russell Brand was rendered speechless on Question Time by this man
Fury at Airbus after it hints the super-jumbo may be mothballed
Disgruntled RBS worker writes hilarious open letter to Russell Brand after anti-capitalist publicity stunt leaves him hungry
Shock poll shows voters believe Ukip is to the left of the Tories
Nigel Farage's approval rating hits 'record low' as popularity suffers in wake of Ukip sex scandal
Nigel Farage defends Kerry Smith 'ch***y' comment: 'If you are going for a Chinese, what do you say you’re going for?'
Ukip candidate jokes about 'shooting peasants' in racist and homophobic rant
Pakistan school attack live: Taliban kill at least 132 children in 'horrifying' massacre
iJobs Money & Business
$200 - $350 per annum: Carlton Senior Appointments: Managing Producer Office...
$125 - $225 per annum: Carlton Senior Appointments: San Fran - Investment Advi...
Up to £70,000 per annum + benefits: Sheridan Maine: Are you a qualified accoun...
Up to £65,000 per annum + benefits: Sheridan Maine: Are you a qualified accoun...