High Court lets Treasury off the hook on VAT refunds, but appeals loom
Ministers are are breathing a sigh of relief after a landmark High Court ruling appeared to indicate that the Treasury will not have to find billions of pounds to pay additional compensation to businesses it has accepted are owed refunds of value added tax (VAT).
In a test case, brought by Littlewoods, the high street retail chain, the High Court ruled that while HM Revenue & Customs would have to pay interest on the £200m that it has already accepted is owed to the company as a VAT refund, its liability is limited. The bill will now be calculated with simple interest added to the VAT refund, rather than compound interest.
That precedent is set to save the Treasury sizeable sums because the bill for refunds of overpaid VAT already runs into several billion pounds. While money has been set aside to pay compensation for VAT overcharged since 1973 because of an inadvertent breach of European Union law, the Treasury has always insisted it should pay simple, rather than compound interest. Had it lost the Littlewoods case, therefore, the cost of the VAT refunds would have presented taxpayers with potentially huge costs that have not been planned for in ministers' current financial projections.
George Bull, head of tax at Baker Tilly, the accountancy firm, said the ruling was consistent with other judgements handed down in recent months. In particular, a group of motor dealers who had hoped to claim compound interest on tax refunds they are owed was told by the Court of Appeal that they had run out of time to pursue their case.
Despite this, HMRC is not yet in the clear.
Some aspects of the Littlewoods case may yet be appealed to a higher court, with the High Court due to rule next month on whether parts of the judgement should be referred to the European Court of Justice. A related ruling on a different case is also due in the Court of Appeal, where a group of complainants is fighting for compound interest payments on a different basis.
Mr Bull warned: "The Treasury can breathe a sigh of relief following the High Court and Court of Appeal rulings, but the fight is not yet over for taxpayers to assert their right to compound interest." Final clarity on the issue may take as long as two more years to arrive, with the European courts not expected to issue their rulings on the outstanding questions before the end of 2011 or even mid-2012.
Jo from Northern Ireland was less than impressed by Russell Brand's attempt to stage a publicity stunt
- 2 Harry Potter fans can apply to the Hogwarts-inspired College of Wizardry
- 3 Jessica Chambers: 19-year-old woman 'doused with lighter fluid and burned alive' in the US
- 4 Russell Brand calls Nigel Farage 'poundshop Enoch Powell' in BBC Question Time debate
- 5 Orange Wednesdays are no more
Weather bomb in pictures: Storms cuts power for tens of thousands – and snow is on the way
Jessica Chambers: 19-year-old woman 'doused with lighter fluid and burned alive' in the US
Russell Brand calls Nigel Farage 'poundshop Enoch Powell' in BBC Question Time debate
Russell Brand was rendered speechless on Question Time by this man
Fury at Airbus after it hints the super-jumbo may be mothballed
Nigel Farage: Me vs Russell Brand on Question Time – he's got the chest hair but where are his ideas?
Shock poll shows voters believe Ukip is to the left of the Tories
Disgruntled RBS worker writes hilarious open letter to Russell Brand after anti-capitalist publicity stunt leaves him hungry
New era of cheap oil 'will destroy green revolution'
Ukip founder Alan Sked and Nigel Farage 'begged Enoch Powell to stand as a candidate'
Ukip candidate jokes about 'shooting peasants' in racist and homophobic rant
iJobs Money & Business
£40000 - £470000 per annum + bonus: Ashdown Group: Java Developer / J2EE Devel...
£45000 - £55000 per annum + Benefits: Ashdown Group: An exciting opportunity h...
$125 - $175 per annum: Carlton Senior Appointments: Senior Wealth Manager In...
$200 - $350 per annum: Carlton Senior Appointments: Managing Producer Office...