Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Investors split over advice to let Browne stay

Tim Webb
Sunday 23 July 2006 00:00 BST
Comments

BP shareholders are becoming increasingly divided over whether chief executive Lord Browne should be allowed to stay on beyond the mandatory retirement age of 60, in 18 months' time.

A Merrill Lynch report urged investors last week to recommend that BP change its position on Lord Browne's retirement. The Co-operative Insurance Society, a top-20 shareholder, will lobby BP to extend his tenure. Ian Jones, head of responsible investment, said: "We see no reason at the moment why he should step down as long as he continues to perform and he wishes to carry on." A top-five shareholder agreed that Lord Browne should stay.

But two institutional investors said he should go as planned in February 2008. "Every company needs new blood," said one.

Lord Browne has made no secret of his disdain for mandatory retirement. New legislation comes into force in October, banning age discrimination at work.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in