Is your brand and reputation under threat?
Matt Gingell explains how employees’ use of social media could be tarnishing the business image
Employees are often permitted to use social media in the workplace. Some employers may allow their employees limited access for personal use.
Other employers may also encourage their employees to use social media to promote the business and share content through communication tools such as Twitter, Facebook, Google+ and LinkedIn. Such business activity may be seen as important in terms of developing the brand and strengthening client base. Could employees though be sending out the wrong messages?
There have been incidents of alleged damage to company reputation/breach of trust and confidence reported in the media. For instance, thirteen Virgin Atlantic cabin crew were dismissed after allegedly criticising the airline’s safety standards and calling its passengers ‘chavs’ on Facebook.
Then there was the sixteen year old who was apparently dismissed for describing her job as ‘boring’ on Facebook, having added her boss as a friend.
In Preece v JD Wetherspoons Plc the employment tribunal upheld the dismissal of an employee who had been dismissed for making inappropriate comments about customers on Facebook.
Although the employee had argued that her privacy settings meant that her comments would only have been seen by between a maximum of 40 to 50 close friends, the tribunal found that the comments were in the public domain and that her employer had acted fairly in dismissing her.
By contrast, in the case of Witham v Club 24 Limited t/a Ventura the tribunal held that an employee who had posted comments on Facebook about her colleagues had been unfairly dismissed. The tribunal had particular regard for the fact that the comments were ‘relatively mild’ and that there had been no evidence that the client relationship had been damaged.
Other forms of misuse or misapplication of social media within the workplace could, too, have serious detrimental effects on the business brand and reputation.
Supposing an employee posts on LinkedIn an interesting news item relevant to their department’s expertise but adds an opinion which is not completely in line with the company’s views? How about mentioning on Facebook information passed on by a client? Or what about if a comment is made on Twitter but it is inaccurate in some respects or a disseminated blog on Google+ contains several spelling mistakes?
An inconsistent approach, a breach of confidentiality, an error or sloppy presentation could all weaken the standing of the business and influence its position in the market place - and more so if this is happening frequently.
Employers would be well advised to have certain measures in place to reduce the risk of harm being caused by their employees. Employers should, for example, have a social media policy in place.
The policy ought to set out: what constitutes improper and inappropriate use of social media; whether personal usage is permitted; whether business usage is permitted; if there is any monitoring by the employer; and the consequences of breaching the policy, with possible disciplinary action including the sanction of dismissal in certain cases.
Employers who do not wish their employers to use social media may choose to block access. Employers who do want to allow some of their employees business use could provide more detailed guidelines on: which employees it would apply to; prior line manager approval if required; training; house-style/uniform practice; and tips.
Matt Gingell is a Partner at law firm Gannons Solicitors which specialises in employment and commercial law.
- 1 Which country would be hardest to invade?
- 2 The man who filmed the Freddie Gray video has been arrested at gunpoint
- 3 Indonesia executions: Death row British grandmother Lindsay Sandiford will refuse to wear a blindfold when she faces firing squad
- 4 How the language you speak changes your view of the world
- 5 Royal baby girl born: Duchess of Cambridge's second child will be a princess thanks to Queen
Over 50,000 families shipped out of London boroughs in the past three years due to welfare cuts and soaring rents
EU asylum policy is 'a direct threat to our civilisation', says Nigel Farage
The Rothschild Libel: Why has it taken 200 years for an anti-Semitic slur that emerged from the Battle of Waterloo to be dismissed?
General Election 2015: SNP and its activists 'openly racist' towards the English, Farage says
General Election 2015: UK will be 'run for the wealthy and powerful' if Tories retain power, Labour warns
Schools forced to act as 'miniature welfare states' with teachers buying underwear and even haircuts for poor pupils
iJobs Money & Business
£16000 - £18500 per annum: Recruitment Genius: This is an excellent opportunit...
£24000 - £28000 per annum: Recruitment Genius: A Senior SEO Executive is requi...
£16000 - £18000 per annum: Recruitment Genius: An Online customer Service Admi...
£18000 - £22000 per annum: Recruitment Genius: This global, industry leading, ...