Is your brand and reputation under threat?
Matt Gingell explains how employees’ use of social media could be tarnishing the business image
Thursday 22 May 2014
Employees are often permitted to use social media in the workplace. Some employers may allow their employees limited access for personal use.
Other employers may also encourage their employees to use social media to promote the business and share content through communication tools such as Twitter, Facebook, Google+ and LinkedIn. Such business activity may be seen as important in terms of developing the brand and strengthening client base. Could employees though be sending out the wrong messages?
There have been incidents of alleged damage to company reputation/breach of trust and confidence reported in the media. For instance, thirteen Virgin Atlantic cabin crew were dismissed after allegedly criticising the airline’s safety standards and calling its passengers ‘chavs’ on Facebook.
Then there was the sixteen year old who was apparently dismissed for describing her job as ‘boring’ on Facebook, having added her boss as a friend.
In Preece v JD Wetherspoons Plc the employment tribunal upheld the dismissal of an employee who had been dismissed for making inappropriate comments about customers on Facebook.
Although the employee had argued that her privacy settings meant that her comments would only have been seen by between a maximum of 40 to 50 close friends, the tribunal found that the comments were in the public domain and that her employer had acted fairly in dismissing her.
By contrast, in the case of Witham v Club 24 Limited t/a Ventura the tribunal held that an employee who had posted comments on Facebook about her colleagues had been unfairly dismissed. The tribunal had particular regard for the fact that the comments were ‘relatively mild’ and that there had been no evidence that the client relationship had been damaged.
Other forms of misuse or misapplication of social media within the workplace could, too, have serious detrimental effects on the business brand and reputation.
Supposing an employee posts on LinkedIn an interesting news item relevant to their department’s expertise but adds an opinion which is not completely in line with the company’s views? How about mentioning on Facebook information passed on by a client? Or what about if a comment is made on Twitter but it is inaccurate in some respects or a disseminated blog on Google+ contains several spelling mistakes?
An inconsistent approach, a breach of confidentiality, an error or sloppy presentation could all weaken the standing of the business and influence its position in the market place - and more so if this is happening frequently.
Employers would be well advised to have certain measures in place to reduce the risk of harm being caused by their employees. Employers should, for example, have a social media policy in place.
The policy ought to set out: what constitutes improper and inappropriate use of social media; whether personal usage is permitted; whether business usage is permitted; if there is any monitoring by the employer; and the consequences of breaching the policy, with possible disciplinary action including the sanction of dismissal in certain cases.
Employers who do not wish their employers to use social media may choose to block access. Employers who do want to allow some of their employees business use could provide more detailed guidelines on: which employees it would apply to; prior line manager approval if required; training; house-style/uniform practice; and tips.
Matt Gingell is a Partner at law firm Gannons Solicitors which specialises in employment and commercial law.
- 1 Miley Cyrus' homeless MTV VMAs date, Jesse Helt, is wanted by the police
- 2 36-year-old skeleton of dead baby found inside Indian woman
- 4 Homer Simpson has taken the ALS ice bucket challenge because of course he has
- 5 The 13 obscure UK laws you didn’t know you were breaking
Miley Cyrus' homeless MTV VMAs date, Jesse Helt, is wanted by the police
Pamela Anderson rejects ice bucket challenge because of ALS experiments on animals: 'Mice had holes drilled into their skulls'
The 13 obscure UK laws you didn’t know you were breaking
Teenager dies after suspected ice bucket challenge goes horribly wrong
Car tax disc changes: Make sure you know the new rules from 1 October or risk £1,000 fine
Exclusive: We share blame for creating 'jihad generation', says Muslim strategist
Robin Williams Emmys tribute led by Billy Crystal criticised for including 'racist' joke about Muslim woman
The Rotherham child abuse scandal is a tale of apologists, misogyny and double standards
Scottish independence TV debate: Pumped-up Alex Salmond bounces back in bruising second round against Alistair Darling
Jeremy Clarkson is a cultural tumour and needs to be removed, says comedian Frankie Boyle
Air strikes? Talk of God? Barack Obama is following the jihadists’ script after James Foley beheading
- < Previous
- Next >
iJobs Money & Business
£23000 - £26000 per annum: Ashdown Group: Account Executive / Client Services ...
£36000 - £38000 per annum: Ashdown Group: Executive PA to CEO & Executive Dire...
£25000 - £28000 per annum: Ashdown Group: Generalist HR Administrator - Tunbri...
£30-35k + Excellent Benefits: Guru Careers: We are seeking a Management Accoun...