Labour promise to limit high street banks is flawed, says Bank of England governor Mark Carney
Canadian defends bonuses and derides Ed Miliband’s plan to give customers more choice by limiting market share
Andrew Grice has been Political Editor of The Independent since 1998. He was previously Political Editor of The Sunday Times, where he worked for 10 years, and he has been a Westminster-based journalist since 1982. His column, Inside Politics, appears in The Independent each Saturday.
Wednesday 15 January 2014
A Labour government would dilute the power of the “Big Five” high street banks by placing a cap on their domestic market share, Ed Miliband will announce on Friday.
The Independent has learnt that a maximum market share would be set by the Competition and Markets Authority. It would base the cap on a series of key tests set by the government.
The move comes after the Prime Minister rejected Labour demands to stop the state-owned Royal Bank of Scotland handing out huge bonuses this year. David Cameron said the Government would veto any increase in the overall pay bill for RBS investment bankers. However, that will not prevent big bonuses because the bank has shed thousands of jobs.
In a keynote speech, Mr Miliband will answer Conservative jibes that he has no long-term economic plan by shifting his sights from the energy firms to the banks. He will call for fundamental reform to allow smaller banks to enter the market, giving consumers more choice and making it much easier to switch banks.
The Labour plan could force the big retail banks to sell off hundreds of branches. At present, HSBC, Barclays, RBS, Santander and Lloyds account for 90 per cent of bank customers and total lending.
But Mark Carney, the Governor of the Bank of England, poured cold water on Labour’s big idea. He told the Commons Treasury Committee that a cap on banks’ market share would “not result in substantial improvement to competition”. He added: “Just breaking up an institution doesn’t necessarily create or enable a more intensive competitive structure.” The Governor noted that the existence of a 10 per cent limit on banks’ market share of deposits in the US had not prevented the development of large and fragile institutions.
Mr Carney also said he was not convinced a “crude bonus cap” was the right way to control pay. The Governor argued that the EU-wide limit on bonuses for bankers earning more than £830,000 to 100 per cent of salary, or 200 per cent if approved by shareholders, was likely to encourage financial institutions to push up their employees’ base cash salaries instead – sums which could not be clawed back in the future in the same manner as bonuses awarded in the form of deferred shares.
Chris Leslie, the shadow Chief Treasury Secretary, said that people were more likely to get divorced than change their bank account. “We have got to give customers more choice,” he said. “Fees and charges are too high, there’s not enough sense of competition and hunger among the banks to serve the customers.”
Labour also wants to create a network of regional banks, that would lend money to local businesses so that they could expand and create jobs.
Today, Mr Cameron was on the defensive over the annual round of bankers’ bonuses. Ministers want RBS to attract and retain the best bankers in order to boost the prospects of recouping the £45bn taxpayers’ bailout. But that may leave the Government exposed to criticism over high bonuses in the meantime.
At Prime Minister’s Questions, Mr Cameron promised to limit cash bonuses at RBS to £2,000 for the third year running. However, that would not stop bankers receiving bonuses in shares. He dismissed Mr Miliband’s call to ban any bonus worth more than 100 per cent of salary.
Cameron aides said total remuneration at RBS had halved from £2.9bn to £1.4bn. But Labour pointed out that 40,000 jobs had been lost at the bank since the crisis. “It is quite clear that the Government will do nothing to rein in these excessive bonuses,” said a Labour source.
Later, a Labour motion calling on the Government to reject any request from RBS to increase the bonus cap was defeated by 304 votes to 242.
George Osborne, the Chancellor, said: “These European rules will not lead to bankers being paid less. What they will lead to is a Fred Goodwin-style situation where you will not be able to get money back off bankers when things go wrong. That is precisely what we have been trying to get away from in Britain.”
RBS stressed it had not made any decision on whether to seek shareholder approval to pay the maximum allowable bonus. The majority of European banks are expected to ask shareholders to endorse bonuses at the higher level of up to 200 per cent.
- 1 Half of young women unable to ‘locate vagina’ and 65% find it difficult to say the word
- 2 Perez Hilton apologises for Jennifer Lawrence naked photo leak
- 3 A teacher speaks out: 'I'm effectively being forced out of a career that I wanted to love'
- 4 Mexican woman becomes world’s 'oldest person' at 127
- 5 Jennifer Lawrence 'naked sex video' will be leaked threatens 4Chan celebrity photo hacker
Rotherham child sex abuse scandal: Labour Home Office to be probed over what Tony Blair's government knew - and when
What do immigrants really think of Britain? Polish immigrant's Reddit post goes viral
Ashya King: Parents of five-year-old boy refused permission to visit him in hospital and denied bail at Spanish court
With Douglas Carswell joining Ukip, my party has taken another giant step forward
When elitism grips the top of British society to this extent, there is only one answer: abolish private schools
Ashya King: 'Cruel NHS has not given us the treatment we need', says father of five-year-old with brain tumour who fled to Spain
iJobs Money & Business
£40000 - £50000 per annum + benefits+bonus+package: Harrington Starr: SQL Impl...
£85000 per annum: Harrington Starr: Head of IT (Windows, Server, VMware, SAN, ...
£40000 - £50000 per annum: Harrington Starr: You will not be expected to hav...
£500 per day: Harrington Starr: SQL DBA/Developer SQL, C#, VBA, Data Warehousi...