Pandit rejects calls to break up Citigroup
Saturday 10 May 2008
Latest in Business News
On Facebook
Vikram Pandit, the chief executive of Citigroup, has launched a robust defence of the banking and investment conglomerate, saying it was well placed to become as major a force in developing markets as it is in the US.
Revealing the progress of his review of the company, five months after being promoted to the top job, Mr Pandit dismissed Wall Street calls to break up the group, but he did announce a dramatic programme to sell or wind down its least profitable businesses.
He labelled 22 per cent of the company's activities as "non-core" and said it would shed assets worth between $400bn and $500bn. He also promised $15bn in annual cost savings, raising the spectre of more job cuts across the 370,000-strong workforce.
The business is reeling from $40bn of losses in the mortgage market since the start of the credit crisis last summer, and Mr Pandit has come under fire from what critics say is a lacklustre and directionless start to his leadership.
Yesterday, at a meeting with investors and Wall Street analysts at Citigroup's Manhattan headquarters, Mr Pandit warned that it would take time and require patience to restructure the business.
"Stage one is getting fit, focusing on exiting legacy assets, focusing on returns, managing risk and re-engineering the cost base, but there are two more stages," he said, adding that individual businesses would be restructured and then managers told to examine what Citigroup as a whole can do for its clients.
Citigroup spans retail banking, wealth management and investment banking, having been assembled through a string of acquisitions in the Nineties. The problem was not that the businesses did not fit together, but that the acquisitions were never properly integrated, Mr Pandit said.
A full-service financial firm is the best way to win clients in emerging markets, he said. "We are in 106 countries and we believe the right model is a global, universal bank. It is fundamentally different to a conglomerate or a 'financial supermarket'. It is the only model that creates value in emerging markets that have less developed financial markets."
Henry Asher, president of the fund manager Northstar, said of Citi: "It's too big for management to get their hands around. No one could possibly go into that situation and quickly and completely understand all the nuances of such a sprawling business."
- 1 Pete Doherty: I was a bit unhinged
- 2 Vatican told to pay taxes as Italy tackles budget crisis
- 3 Greeks rage at erosion of sovereignty while leaders haggle over deal
- 4 Swiss to launch a space 'janitor'
- 5 Rothschild loses libel case, and reveals secret world of money and politics
- 6 Energy watchdog tells big firms: cut prices or else
- 7 Prove you gave away Chechen money, charities tell Hilary Swank
- 1 Vatican told to pay taxes as Italy tackles budget crisis
- 2 Spotify: 1 million plays, £108 return
- 3 Pete Doherty: I was a bit unhinged
- 4 Khader Adnan: The West Bank's Bobby Sands
- 5 Rothschild loses libel case, and reveals secret world of money and politics
- 6 'My 10 days at an Eton summer school was a real shock to the system'
- 7 WikiLeaks takes aim at an unlikely new victim: Unesco
- 8 Prehistoric cybermen? Sardinia's lost warriors rise from the dust
- 9 Can you master a language in a weekend?
- 10 The artist vandalising advertising with poetry
Free trial of new Independent iPad app
Get your daily dose of the best of British journalism, sponsored by American Airlines
Amazing restaurant offers
Three glasses of free champagne and a special menu at 46 top London restaurants.
Latest Independent competitions
Win anything from gadgets to five-star holidays on our competitions and offers page.
Commercial thought leaders
Watch the best in the business world give their insights into the world of business.
Career Services
Day In a Page
Wilderness and wildlife in Australia’s Top End
48 Hours: Marrakech
Bear with Bern for Swiss skiing
The West Bank's Bobby Sands
Is there such a thing as a gastronomic gender divide?




Comments