Business

Partly Sunny with Showers 10° London Hi 12°C / Lo 6°C

Plunging price of carbon may threaten investment

By Sarah Arnott

The price of carbon has lost almost two-thirds of its value in the past six months, threatening future investments in the energy sector and undermining confidence in the second phase of Europe's Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS). An EU permit to emit one tonne of CO2 cost €10.15 (£8.86) at the end of last week, down from €28.50 in mid-2008 and a far cry from forecasts of up to €40.

The most bearish experts are now predicting that the price could fallas low as €9 as global recession, reduced manufacturing output, and the concomitant reduction in consumption of fossil fuels, feeds through to reduce the need for carbon emissions permits.

The danger is that business plans for infrastructure projects like power stations and wind farms will founder. In the first phase of the EU ETS, which ran from 2005 to 2008, permits were vastly over-issued, pushing the price of carbon to less than €1 and rendering the mechanism meaningless as a predictable revenue stream.

A major price drop in the second phase of the scheme, which runs to 2012, could cause a repeat crisis of confidence by throwing future projections into question.

Jeff Chapman, the chief executive of the Carbon Capture and Storage Association, said: "The problem is that investors can't bank on a future value of carbon. It is impossible to take a project proposal to a bank based on a future price because we have seen the price collapse once before, and it is now doing it again."

There are now questions about whether government policies might change as the economic climate worsens. Paul Golby, the chief executive of E.ON, said: "There is a confidence issue around whether governments will keep their nerve. The plan was to keep tightening the carbon market to push the price up and encourage low-carbon investment.

"The question now is whether governments back away from that, and seek to ameliorate the effect of the recession on hard-hit industries by keeping the carbon price low."

Supporters of the trading scheme interpret the fluctuations of the carbon price in line with wider economic indicators as evidence of a mature and well-functioning market.

Henrik Hasselknippe, the director of Carbon Analysis at PointCarbon, said: "What we are seeing now is carbon functioning as a commodity and reacting to the same fundamentals as any other market in the world. It would be much more worrying if carbon stayed high because that would indicate something was wrong."

But the low price is already having a tangible effect. Under the Kyoto Protocol's Clean Development Mechanism (CDM), industrialised countries can invest in overseas low-carbon projects as a cheaper alternative to pursuing such schemes at home. But with EU carbon prices coming down to within an ace of costs in China or India, the differential is no longer enough justification.

"At the moment, people are holding off investing in these projects because profitability is dwindling with lower emissions prices," Mr Hasselknippe said. "Saving just one extra euro isn't enough to make people go to China."

Despite the gloom in the rest of the economy, carbon trading has flourished since the start of phase two of the EU ETS last January, under which fewer permits were issued, and a proportion will be auctioned for the first time.

Last year was a bumper year for the European Climate Exchange (ECX). Some 2.8bn tonnes of emissions were traded, a massive 170 per cent rise on 2007. Patrick Birley, the ECX chief executive, said: "The exchange had a fantastic year, although it was hard to walk around the City feeling good about our volumes when so many of our friends were being clubbed."

Post a Comment

View all comments that have been posted about this article.

Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.

Comments

Carbon Futures - Yeah, That'll Do It
[info]joebhed wrote:
Monday, 9 February 2009 at 04:35 pm (UTC)
The only hope we have is that the falling to pieces of the carbon-future-market, you know, the PROOF that the carbon market is actually working just fine, will continue while the US Congress is still debating its Climate Change bills, and we can actually have an honest look at the carbon tax as a substitute for the dastardly carbon Cap-and-Trade program.
Carbon tax NOW !
all so predictable
[info]carbonabuser wrote:
Tuesday, 10 February 2009 at 05:12 am (UTC)
This is what happens when legislators who have never traded and cannot comprehend markets or calculate baseline emissions meet manipulators in eco-green suits.
The emperor has no clothes, folks.
[info]jvoorhees1 wrote:
Tuesday, 10 February 2009 at 03:29 pm (UTC)
As an avid student of politics, history, and economics over fifty years, with special interests in energy policies and the environment, it's hard for me to read about all this without laughing. 100% of the observational evidence about global warming now directly exonerates CO2 as the culprit. All of those scientific facts we used to think implicated CO2 have now been overturned. Example: the ice-core data was being read backwards (warming precedes CO2 by 800 years on average, so CO2 can't be causing the warming), the correlation between increasing CO2 and increasing temperatures has been totally missing in the last 75 years (earth's temperatures declining from 1940 to 1975 while CO2 increased, going up from '75 to '98 while CO2 increased, and then falling again from '98 to now, while CO2 has soared; and finally the "greenhouse signature" (upper troposphere warming faster than surface) which even the IPCC agreed HAD to be there if the temperature was being primarily driven by CO2, was found to be conspicuously missing. Bottom line: there is no longer ANY scientific evidence that A-CO2 is the primary driver of temperature changes, and all the evidence shows it is not. Meanwhile, the EU has created a vast tax-and-spend bureaucracy around the now-disproven belief that CO2 is the primary driver of climate change. I know that bureaucracies, once launched, are almost impossible to kill. But this may go down in history as one of the most out-of-control, divorced-from-reality, damaging things any government has ever done. (Not counting wars, obviously.) Fortunately in the U.S. (where I live) the anti-CO2 witch-hunt madness is being snuffed out by the collapsing economy. At least that's one thing good to come out of the collapse. The question now remains: Will the EU finally "get the memo" and realize that everything they're doing with carbon trading has become (no offense) silly to the point of absurdity. What will future historians say about this? Perhaps they'll say that mass psychosis seizes the population every several hundred years, and seems to be an unstoppable phenomenon. I believe it was in the 14th century that residents of York murdered thousands of Jews because they thought the Jews were causing the plague. We now know it wasn't actually the Jews, after all. And we have also learned that it's not carbon dioxide, after all. Note to EU ministers: Please stop the rioting and rejoin the world of the sane.
Carbon credits set to incinerate a city's future
[info]blandnic wrote:
Thursday, 12 February 2009 at 05:23 pm (UTC)
Look at what they want to do to the city where I live.
http://www.palmerston-north.info
Thanks
[info]franchise999 wrote:
Sunday, 12 April 2009 at 02:31 pm (UTC)
Great article - the Internet is such a great medium and resource and I thank you for taking the time out to write, it is always a pleasure to read.

Matthew Anderson
Low Investment Franchise and general franchise information and resources