Business

Rain (AM and PM) 7° London Hi 9°C / Lo 7°C

Ruth Madoff took $2m from London office before collapse

Serious Fraud Office investigates UK arm of Madoff's business

By Stephen Foley in New York

Ruth Madoff, the wife of Wall Street swindler Bernard Madoff, received $2m (£1.4m) in payments from the family's London business less than a month before his arrest, further drawing her finances into criminal investigations on both sides of the Atlantic.

The Serious Fraud Office in the UK yesterday characterised Madoff's London operation as "a cog in the giant washing machine", as it set out new details of how the former Nasdaq chairman ran his $65bn Ponzi scheme.

The SFO and the FBI in New York are each investigating who else might have known about Mr Madoff's illegal activities, which stretch back at least to the early 1990s. Mr Madoff claims he acted alone, and his wife has not been charged with any wrongdoing.

The $2m transfer to Mrs Madoff personally in late November was revealed yesterday by the SFO's Madoff case manager, Glyn Powell, in an update on the investigation.

At that time, her husband had been desperately seeking money to shore up his scheme. For decades, while pretending to be investing in the stock market, Mr Madoff had in fact been paying clients with the fresh money coming in from new investors. The scheme began collapsing last autumn as the new money dried up.

It emerged last month that Mrs Madoff also withdrew $5.5m from a brokerage account in the US at about the same time, and then took out another $10m on 10 December – the very day her husband made his confession.

Prosecutors in the US are seeking to seize property, including the couple's Manhattan penthouse and three other homes, which is held largely in Mrs Madoff's name. Mr Madoff, 70, was remanded in custody after pleading guilty to 11 charges earlier this month. Three counts of money laundering refer to the transatlantic transfers made between Madoff Investment Securities in New York and Madoff Securities International in London, which investigators believe were made to create the illusion of genuine investment activity and to boost profits at the share-trading arm of his business.

"MSI UK played a significant role in the operation of Bernard Madoff's investment fraud," Mr Powell said yesterday. "It was a cog in the giant washing machine."

MSI claimed to be a legitimate business set up just to invest the Madoffs' own money. Its offices were in the Mayfair area of London, which is home to many hedge funds, and its traders were monitored by CCTV by Mr Madoff from New York. The investigation by the SFO is examining whether anyone in the London office knew, or should have known, that the Madoff enterprise was a fraud. Its officers say that there are still many unanswered questions but that their work is making fast progress and they expect that any charges will be filed before the end of this year.

To date, the only other person to have been charged anywhere in the world in connection with Mr Madoff's fraud is his auditor, David Friehling, who was freed on bail in New York earlier this month. Mr Friehling was paid up to $14,000 a month by Madoff, but only "pretended" to audit his business, according to legal filings.

Mrs Madoff agreed to a freeze on her assets when her husband was bailed. She has hired a separate lawyer to represent her, since she is a party to numerous lawsuits from aggrieved investors.

Mr Madoff's fraud is the largest in Wall Street's history, hitting 4,800 clients, including charities and Hollywood celebrities. It has humiliated the SEC, which repeatedly investigated fraud allegations against Madoff yet failed to uncover the fraud.

Post a Comment

View all comments that have been posted about this article.

Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.

Comments

Madoff scam
[info]mightywarrior1 wrote:
Saturday, 28 March 2009 at 07:35 am (UTC)
It is plainly obvious to me from reading in between the lines of this article that Mrs Madoff is involved in this scam and that all her possessions, bank accounts and anything else should be frozen immediately. Then eventually Mrs Madoff should be charged and brought to court to answer those charges. If she is found guilty, she should join her husband in jail and whilst there everything that they have got including bank accounts, various properties and possessions should be sold and the money raised be given back to the investors who have lost out.

When giving money to investors give priority to the people who least can afford to lose money. The rich investors will not lose any sleep on money that they have lost out.
Madoff's wife vs SEC
[info]12dec2012 wrote:
Saturday, 28 March 2009 at 11:12 am (UTC)
Madoff was able to fool over 4000 private investors, institutional investors, world leading banks and -despite allegations from competitors- even the SEC, that somehow was unable to find any wrongdoing. That his wife is now regarded as the big accomplice is a cheap diversion. I would rather see SEC to take a significant part of the blame. There will always be Madoff's around and investors will need protection from these corrupted individuals. It is not acceptable to dismantle the Ponzi scheme to simply find that the funds are all unaccounted for and that those organisations watching over investor's interests simply could wash their hands in innocence. Trust in the financial sector is at a very low and will remain so until firm action is taken to safeguard investors interest.
FSA, SEC , et al
[info]richardjeff wrote:
Saturday, 28 March 2009 at 11:54 am (UTC)
What we have learnt from Madoff and other frauds are:
1. Both SEC and FSA, plus the equivalents in other countries have been ineffective.
2. Financial advisers have put advice and due consideration to the clients far below building their own wealth.

Maybe it should be mandatory that any investment advisor gets paid only by a percentage of the growth/return on that investment over time. No growth, no pay. That would focus them. (Provided the growth was real and not cooked books).
The Madoffs et consortes
[info]rogermrogalski wrote:
Saturday, 28 March 2009 at 11:54 am (UTC)
On TV no vindictivenes, just statements that our countries are not run by the mob laws, might sound civil and good. While the fact remains the we are increasinly and to a large degree run by the gain driven, corrupt mobsters often in polished guises. This lot should be hit where it really pains. No prison sentences, at taxpayer cost, no lengthy meticulous lawsuits. Just total sequestration of all the property. I could mention good handful of countries were it would be delt like that in a course of few months, and all within the framework of the law. Let's remember that laws are man-made. hence can serve divers purposes.
The history knows many attempts to perpetrate two tiers societies and world views; " there is no such thing like society". And they all ended up the same.
[info]theolderb wrote:
Saturday, 28 March 2009 at 07:54 pm (UTC)
So? Ask the Americans to send her back on extradition, to face charges of unlawful conversion or something similar? They would, had the countries been reversed - and insisted on our complying with it too! remember the British bankers, sent over to face charges over actions they had taken [and never been charged with!] in Britain? But then Britain might or might not 'Rule the Waves' but America rules the legal world!
wall street is a big maddoff
[info]oilfxpro wrote:
Sunday, 29 March 2009 at 07:32 am (UTC)
The whole of wall street is full of ponzi operators, only one of them got caught.

Maddoff pension funds , maddoff mutual funds , maddoff stockmarket.


Buy stocks and get new investors to pay old investors off.

Wall street is a closed shop and it works on who know whom , and maddoff could not have carried out this scheme without the aid of other crooks in the financial services feeding the maddof scheme