Shell became the latest company to receive a bloody nose yesterday, as more than a tenth of the oil giant's investors failed to approve the pay awards of its top-level executives.
Despite Shell reporting a 54 per cent jump in profits last year, just over 9 per cent of investors voted against the pay award for chief executive Peter Voser, which more than doubled over the period. Including abstentions, 11 per cent of shareholders failed to back Shell's remuneration report, which also included a €2.52m (£2m)severance payment for Malcolm Brinded, who stepped down as head of exploration and production in April.
"I think it is excessive," said John Farmer, a Shell shareholder, about Mr Voser's €11.7m total pay award – up from €5.2m in 2010 – helped by a €4.6m payout as three lucrative, long-term incentive plans vested. In 2011, Mr Brinded received a total of €11.4m.
Although it was considerably smaller than the majority votes against some recent remuneration reports – such as Aviva and Pendragon – opposition to Shell was well up on last year, when the no vote came to just 1.24 per cent.
The rise in opposition came against a backdrop of growing shareholder resistance to large executive payouts, and, in part, on the recommendation of investor advisory group PIRC which guided investors to oppose Shell's remuneration report for 2011.
"Combined remuneration is excessive in the year under review with the CEO receiving annual incentive and conditional L-tip (long-term incentive plan) awards worth 526 per cent of salary," Pirc said in its report ahead of the Shell AGM.
A Shell spokesman said: "Shell's remuneration policy firmly links executive compensation with the performance of the company, and the 2011 outcomes reflect what was a positive year."
At the meeting, shareholders lined up to attack Shell over plans to step up production in the Arctic, its record of cleaning oil spills – and compensating their victims – in Nigeria and for its contribution to global warming by producing fossil fuels.
Shell's chairman Jorma Ollila explained that the company "recognised the special challenges" of drilling in the Arctic and was behaving responsibly and that it was committed to cleaning all the oil spills that emanate from the operations of its SPDC Nigerian joint venture – even those that are caused by theft or sabotage.Reuse content