The bosses who gambled and lost

Click to follow
The Independent Online

Loathing and fear continued to grip Wall Street yesterday as investors and financial sector employees struggled to understand how allegedly iron-clad institutions, including Citigroup and Merrill Lynch, fell so dramatically foul of the sub-prime mortgage fiasco announcing multi-billion-dollar write-downs.

"Wall Street wants heads," said analyst David Dreman, whose firm Dreman Value management is based in Aspen, Colorado. Shaken investors have seen two very large ones roll from top perches already – first Stan O'Neal of Merrill Lynch and on Sunday, Charles "Chuck" Prince of Citigroup – but the spectacle of their respective humiliations has been scarcely satisfying.

Healthy though it may be that even the most senior-ranking universe-masters are willing to fall on their swords, it doesn't answer how their respective banks bungled so badly in the first place, exposing themselves to such gargantuan risk with deeply complicated financial products that perhaps even their own specialists didn't understand, all built on a sub-prime lending bonanza that so quickly went sour.

Nor can anyone truly pretend that the departure of these two men will solve a great deal while so many questions still abound. How come these and other banks struggling to cope with assets turned rotten, like UBS and Bear Stearns, did not see what was coming sooner? Did they, in fact, hoodwink investors and even themselves in pretending the problems would go away? And what shoes are still to drop? UBS, Europe's fifth-largest bank that until recently was widely respected for managing the wealth of the rich, has already sent its chief executive, Peter Wuffli, packing after his steering of the bank into the mortgage-related securities business resulted in depressed results and a 21 per cent plunge in its stock price.

Still in his job is Bear Stearns CEO James Cayne, but hardly comfortably. Last week, he was stacking sand-bags around his suite at the bank's headquarters after a scathing profile in the Wall Street Journal accused him of smoking pot and goofing off at critical moments to play golf and bridge. Blaming is a game few can resist when Wall Street hits rocks with so dramatic a jolt. Not escaping either is Hank Paulson, the US Treasury Secretary, whose job it is to reassure markets when not a few analysts are recalling his tenure as head of Goldman Sachs at a time when that bank also was accumulating some $37bn of bonds backed by sub-prime loans or second mortgages.

Nor are many reassured by the choice of the former Treasury Secretary Robert Rubin as the new chairman of Citigroup, given his job over previous months advising that bank's board as it made course for the reef. Neither he nor the wider board at the bank apparently had the foresight or courage to grab the wheel from Mr Prince. "Since joining Citigroup, Mr Rubin's performance has vacillated between disappointing to terrible," Richard Bove, an analyst at Punk Ziegel & Co, wrote in a note to investors.

But the ripples – or tsunami waves – of the crisis extend far beyond the daily schedules of some sacked CEOs. Merrill Lynch faces a practical vacuum of talent as brokers, mostly paid in a stock that has collapsed in value, flee to competing institutions with lower levels of dodgy exposure. Then there is the pain for the much wider workforce on Wall Street without corner offices. The lay-off train has barely departed and yet, according to one New York recruitment company, as many as 42,000 Wall Street employees have already found themselves laid off this year because of the collapse in banking fortunes. Bank of America has already shed a total of 3,000 jobs and Lehman Brothers a further 1,200.

There will not be a happy bonus season on Wall Street this year. As for New York City, it too is preparing to tighten its belt and the banks that have fuelled its prosperity for the past several years are beginning to look like junk.

In the line of fire


The head of Merrill Lynch was forced out after the investment bank ran up huge losses on its investments.


The biggest casualty of the credit crisis to date, Mr Prince's long-awaited resignation was announced on Sunday.


A drastic fall in UBS's share price precipitated the sudden departure of the Swiss bank's chief executive.


The beleaguered boss of Bear Stearns has so far clung on to his job but he has become a figure of ridicule.

The impact in Britain


First-time buyers are finding it increasingly hard to get mortgages in the wake of the credit crisis, as the banks have become more reluctant to offer big loans to new borrowers.

Although those with poor credit histories and low incomes – sub-prime borrowers – have been the hardest hit, the effects of the credit crunch have begun to spread to the mainstream mortgage market, as lenders have tried to cut back on risk. The rise in the cost of borrowing is also having a knock on effect on house prices which fell by 0.1 per cent in October – their first fall in more than two years.


The cost of personal loans and credit cards has started to increase rapidly in the wake of the credit crunch, as lenders have been forced to pay a higher price for their own borrowing.

Only six months ago, loans of below 6 per cent were still available from the most competitive banks and building societies. Yet in the run-up to Christmas – typically when demand for consumer borrowing is at its highest – it Is hard to get a loan with a rate that is much below 7 per cent.

Similarly, credit card companies have tried to recoup the profits they have lost amidst the credit crisis, by edging up the fees and rates on their cards. Moneyfacts, the comparison service, found fees or rates on 125 cards have increased over the past two months.


Investors in the UK's banks will be sitting on hefty losses after the events of the past few months. The share prices of most are now down by between a quarter and a third since the end of the summer – with the sharpest falls coming over the past fortnight, as jitters over the repercussions of the credit crunch have resurfaced with renewed vigour.

Across the board, however, UK investors have had a rather mixed experience on the back of the credit crisis. Although the FTSE 100 index fell back as far as 5,820 points in the middle of August, it has since rallied back to around 6,500.

Mark Dampier, the head of research for Hargreaves Lansdown, the stockbroker and financial adviser, said some bank stocks are paying higher yields than investors could get in their savings account.

He said: "Royal Bank of Scotland is now yielding around 7 per cent. There's a lot of bad news priced into these shares now – the market has effectively priced them for a recession which is worse than the early 1990s. If that doesn't happen, then you could argue that they will eventually rally."

Mr Dampier believes that whether the worst has passed or not, it is likely to be between eight months and up to a year before the markets begin to return to normal.