US judge furious over Citigroup settlement
Stephen Foley is a former Associate Business Editor of The Independent, based in New York. He left in August 2012. In a decade at the paper, he covered personal finance, the UK stock market and the pharmaceuticals industry, and had also been the Business section's share tipster. Between arriving with three suitcases in Manhattan in January 2006 and his departure, he witnessed and reported on a great economic boom turning spectacularly to bust. In March 2009, he was named Business and Finance Journalist of the Year at the British Press Awards.
Tuesday 29 November 2011
The public must learn the truth about the alleged fraud and conflicts of interest at the heart of the credit crisis, a Manhattan judge declared last night, vowing to put Citigroup in the dock over a $1 billion mortgage deal that went sour.
In a searing judgment rejecting a proposed settlement between the bank and Wall Street's regulator, the Securities and Exchange Commission, Judge Jed Rakoff ruled the allegations of negligence must instead be decided at a trial next year. "In any case like this that touches on the transparency of financial markets whose gyrations have so depressed our economy and debilitated our lives, there is an overriding public interest in knowing the truth," Judge Rakoff ruled. "The SEC, of all agencies, has a duty, inherent in its statutory mission, to see that the truth emerges."
The SEC accused Citigroup of misleading investors in a $1bn mortgage-backed vehicle called a collateralised debt obligation (CDO) as the US housing market was beginning to collapse in 2007, by not telling them it was also betting against the transaction. The CDO, "Class V Funding III", was typical of the derivatives at the heart of the credit crisis and slumped in value, costing its investors $700m.
Under the settlement, the bank neither accepted nor denied the charge of negligence. Such an arrangement is common to SEC settlements over alleged wrongdoing in the financial sector, but they have attracted criticism for being too easy on banks. It said last night it still believed the settlement was fair and in the public interest.
Citigroup was required to give up $160m of alleged ill-gotten profit, plus $30m of interest, and pay a $95m fine for the alleged negligence. The fine is a fraction of that paid by Goldman Sachs last year in a $550m settlement over a different CDO. Goldman neither admitted nor denied the central fraud charges in that case, although it did admit to providing incomplete information to investors.
One Citigroup employee, Brian Stoker, has also been charged with negligence by the SEC. He is contesting those charges.
The magicians using online collaboration to push boundaries
Jennifer Lawrence attacks mass media again over body image
Jennifer Lawrence: 'It should be illegal to call someone fat on TV'
Sun will 'flip upside down' within weeks, says Nasa
Ian Watkins: Police forces probed over earlier allegations as paedophile Lostprophets singer sentenced to 35 years for child sex offences
DNA from a 50,000 year old toe shows Neanderthals were highly inbred
Devyani Khobragade: India-US row escalates over arrest of diplomat in New York
- 1 America's 'virgin births'? One in 200 mothers 'became pregnant without having sex'
- 2 Sun will 'flip upside down' within weeks, says Nasa
- 4 Christmas comes early: Justin Bieber announces he's 'retiring from music'
- 5 Children evacuated from swimming pool after prosthetic leg mistaken for paedophile
- < Previous
- Next >
iJobs Money & Business
£25000 - £32000 per annum: Harrington Starr: Junior Business Analyst - Banking...
£25000 - £35000 per annum + benefits + bonus: Harrington Starr: Business Analy...
£50000 - £75000 per annum + benefits + bonus: Harrington Starr: Implementation...
£50000 - £60000 per annum + BONUS + BENEFITS: Harrington Starr: A leading prov...