Washington Redskins lose trademark protection but vow to appeal decision
The Trademark Trial and Appeal Board said the name disparages Native Americans
A US federal trademark board has cancelled the Washington Redskins trademarks after ruling the controversial nickname " disparages Native Americans".
The team said it will appeal the decision, which does not bar the Redskins from using the name, but strips it of protection to stop others from using it, despite mounting political pressure on owner Dan Snyder to change the name.
"We've seen this story before," said the team's attorney, Bob Raskopf, in a statement. "And just like last time, today's ruling will have no effect at all on the team's ownership of and right to use the Redskins name and logo. We are confident we will prevail once again."
The case was filed on behalf of five Native Americans who argued the nickname is offensive and a painful reminder of their suffering throughout American history.
Redskins' owner Snyder has refused to change the name in multiple occasions, arguing that it honours Native Americans. A similar ruling canceled the team's trademarks in 1999 was overturned on a technicality in 2003.
In a statement, the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board said the decision applies to six trademarks - all containing the word Redskins - on the grounds that they " were disparaging to Native Americans at the respective times they were registered".
The Oneida Indian Nation welcomed the decision adding that, "if the most basic sense of morality, decency and civility has not yet convinced" the team to stop using what they described as a "hateful slur", the ruling would serve to stop Mr Snyder from profiting off "the denigration and dehumanisation" of Native Americans.
First full-length look is finally here
World cities ranked in terms of safety, food security and 'liveability'
- 2 The awkward moment Sarah Palin raised $25,000 for Hillary Clinton's election campaign
- 3 Ball pool for adults opens in London
- 4 Amal Clooney gives excellent response to fashion question at European Court of Human Rights
- 5 Baldness could soon be treated using stem cells, scientists hope
Woman falls to her death as she celebrates marriage proposal at the edge of Ibiza cliff
Sex abuse inquiry: 'Victims receive death threats' after MPs release names online
Saudi preacher who 'raped and tortured' his five -year-old daughter to death is released after paying 'blood money'
Teenager brandishing fake gun taken down by police after demanding airtime on Netherlands' NOS TV station
The awkward moment Sarah Palin raised $25,000 for Hillary Clinton's election campaign
9 reasons Greece's experiment with the radical left is doomed to failure
'We would evict Queen from Buckingham Palace and allocate her council house,' say Greens
Have we reached 'peak food'? Shortages loom as global production rates slow
Greece elections: Syriza and EU on collision course after election win for left-wing party
British grandmother Lindsay Sandiford faces execution by firing squad in Indonesia
Liberal Democrat minister defends comments suggesting immigration causes pub closures
iJobs Money & Business
£30000 - £35000 per annum + Benefits: Ashdown Group: Marketing Manager - Marke...
£13000 per annum: Recruitment Genius: This Pension Specialist was established ...
£23000 - £26000 per annum + Benefits: Ashdown Group: Market Research Executive...
£25000 - £35000 per annum: Recruitment Genius: A Technical Report Writer is re...