Outlook: Lottery fever
Wednesday 02 June 1999
But this year's figures have a particular edge to them. Just as the end of Camelot's seven-year franchise hoves into view, the horrible thought occurs that we, as a nation, may at last be succumbing to Lottery fatigue.
There is a natural stage in the life cycle of all lotteries when the exponential rise in revenues begins to plateau out as a result of boredom and familiarity. When this coincides with a High Street downturn, the effect is likely to be all the more pronounced.
This is bad news for the Government, which earned pounds 664m in tax revenues from Camelot last year and is keen to drum up as much interest in possible for the auction of the next concession (to be run, of course, on a not- for-profit basis).
And indeed, the dream of winning enough money to retire on sounds harmless enough. But is the lottery so benign? It has certainly raised plenty for charity, but at least partly at the expense of other charitable giving. Total donations have declined markedly since the mid-1990s. As a tax, it is regressive, raising a disproportionate share of the total prize money from the lowest income groups.
Then there is its malignant influence on entrepreneurship and ambition. Why bother getting good GCSEs, starting a company, doing anything like hard work, when for a couple of pounds a week you might, just maybe, get the reward anyway. Gambling, even officially sanctioned, has a thoroughly rotten psychological effect. For all these reasons, lottery culture ought not to have a place in a modern economy. But now that it is here, like the poor, it will probably always be with us.
There is, of course the question of whether a private sector company should be allowed to profit from the people's lottery. Certainly, it is easy to sympathise with Richard Branson's pitch for a non-profit making lottery, and hard to resist a sneaky pleasure about the drop in profits reported by Camelot.
Equally, there is a good case for arguing that if there has to be a lottery, it should be run efficiently. The profit motive is therefore unavoidable. However, given that it is a monopoly granted by the state, there must be no presumption of automatic renewal of the licence.
- 1 BBC election debate: The one photo that summed up the whole 90-minute leaders debate
- 2 18th century sex toy found in 'toilet of sword fighting school' in Poland
- 3 'I wish my teacher knew...': Young students share their 'heartbreaking' worries in notes
- 4 Rebecca Francis accuses Ricky Gervais of using 'influence' to target female hunters after receiving barrage of death threats
- 5 Australian student Tommy Connolly, 23, adopts his pregnant, homeless 17-year-old cousin to give her a chance at 'a better life'
General Election 2015: David Cameron catching up in polls – but he badly needs a clear lead
South Africa xenophobic attacks: Shops looted and violence on streets of Johannesburg as foreigners are forced to hide in police stations
Earthworms rain down from skies over Norway, puzzling scientists
18th century sex toy found in 'toilet of sword fighting school' in Poland
'I wish my teacher knew...': Young students share their 'heartbreaking' worries in notes
The only black face in the Ukip manifesto is on the page about overseas aid
Ukip is the only main political party to not address LGBT rights in its manifesto
If I’m being racially abused I don’t need a stranger with a saviour complex to rescue me
BBC election debate: The one photo that summed up the whole 90-minute leaders debate
Religion isn't growing, it is becoming vigorous in its demise, says philosopher AC Grayling
General Election 2015: Polish prince challenges Nigel Farage to a duel over immigration question
iJobs Money & Business
£20000 - £25000 per annum + OTE £45,000: SThree: SThree Group have been well e...
£50000 - £667000 per annum + excellent benefits : Ashdown Group: IT Manager / ...
£13000 - £20000 per annum: Recruitment Genius: Scotland's leading life insuran...
£40000 - £45000 per annum + benefits : Ashdown Group: Training Programme Manag...