Outlook: Regional brewers
Thursday 03 December 1998
too? That's what Wolverhampton & Dudley thinks anyway. The trouble is
that its Midlands rival, Marston, Thompson & Evershed, doesn't want to
play ball. This pounds 260m takeover battle moved up a gear yesterday with news
that Marston is promising shareholders an increase in the payback from
60p to 101p a share should they reject the bid.
Marston is able to do this because it is securitising its tenanted estate,
a disposal which will realise some pounds 137.3m. David Thompson of Wolverhampton
& Dudley has in turn made his offer conditional on shareholders rejecting
this proposal, since a part of the rationale for the bid is gaining access
to Marston's tenanted estate. In other words, he's threatening to withdraw
his bid if shareholders back Marston's securitisation plan.
Whether he will go through with this threat remains to be seen; the
condition can be waived. But is this a risk shareholders want to take?
Next Wednesday they assemble in Burton upon Trent to vote on the issue,
so it's make your mind up time.
The argument is a finely balanced one. Marston hints obscurely that there
might be other bidders in the wings - Greene King for instance - for whom
a cash-rich brewer stripped of its tenanted estate could be attractive.
If there is to be a wide ranging consolidation among regional brewers,
it might pay to see who else comes out of the woodwork, the argument goes.
It would plainly make sense from everyone's point of view to delay the
securitisation vote so that the bid can be fought on its merits and to
allow for the possibility of higher offers, either from Wolverhampton
or others. Unfortunately, Marston claims, this cannot be done since to
abandon or lengthen the underwriting of the securitisation would be exceptionally
costly and there would be no guarantee of getting such favourable terms
Even so, Marston may have done its shareholders no service by making
a stand on this issue, for if the company loses, it will be as if the
management's defence has already been rejected. Wolverhampton & Dudley
will, as a consequence, be that much more reluctant to raise its bid.
So it's a tough call. In the end, however, shareholders would be wise
to reject their management's proposals. There is likely to be more value
realised by allowing the bid process to run its course than by obstructing
it at this early stage.
Simon Calder looks at communities fighting back against the poachers
Arsenal 1 Everton 1: Substitute equalises with six minutes to go
booksGeese, gorillas, grandads... and growing up
Guide dog mauled while helping owner deliver Christmas cards
The poorest pay the price for austerity: Workers face biggest fall in living standards since Victorian era
Icon or terrorist: Nelson Mandela’s complex bond with Britain
Deadly ice storm sees US temperatures drop to -29C
Millions of families living in poverty despite being in employment says new study
- 1 Turning up the voice of America
- 2 The poorest pay the price for austerity: Workers face biggest fall in living standards since Victorian era
- 3 The man who made Femen: New film outs Victor Svyatski as the mastermind behind the protest group and its breast-baring stunts
- 4 Mass murder in the Middle East is funded by our friends the Saudis
- 5 Japan cracks down on leaks after scandal of Fukushima nuclear power plant
- < Previous
- Next >
iJobs Money & Business
£25000 - £50000 per annum + Benefits + Bonus: Harrington Starr: C++ Server Dev...
£300 - £350 per day: Harrington Starr: Leading Electronic Trading Software Ven...
£80000 - £100000 per annum + benefits + bonus: Harrington Starr: Project Manag...
£50000 - £60000 per annum + benefits + bonus: Harrington Starr: Business Analy...