Outlook: Regional brewers
Thursday 03 December 1998
too? That's what Wolverhampton & Dudley thinks anyway. The trouble is
that its Midlands rival, Marston, Thompson & Evershed, doesn't want to
play ball. This pounds 260m takeover battle moved up a gear yesterday with news
that Marston is promising shareholders an increase in the payback from
60p to 101p a share should they reject the bid.
Marston is able to do this because it is securitising its tenanted estate,
a disposal which will realise some pounds 137.3m. David Thompson of Wolverhampton
& Dudley has in turn made his offer conditional on shareholders rejecting
this proposal, since a part of the rationale for the bid is gaining access
to Marston's tenanted estate. In other words, he's threatening to withdraw
his bid if shareholders back Marston's securitisation plan.
Whether he will go through with this threat remains to be seen; the
condition can be waived. But is this a risk shareholders want to take?
Next Wednesday they assemble in Burton upon Trent to vote on the issue,
so it's make your mind up time.
The argument is a finely balanced one. Marston hints obscurely that there
might be other bidders in the wings - Greene King for instance - for whom
a cash-rich brewer stripped of its tenanted estate could be attractive.
If there is to be a wide ranging consolidation among regional brewers,
it might pay to see who else comes out of the woodwork, the argument goes.
It would plainly make sense from everyone's point of view to delay the
securitisation vote so that the bid can be fought on its merits and to
allow for the possibility of higher offers, either from Wolverhampton
or others. Unfortunately, Marston claims, this cannot be done since to
abandon or lengthen the underwriting of the securitisation would be exceptionally
costly and there would be no guarantee of getting such favourable terms
Even so, Marston may have done its shareholders no service by making
a stand on this issue, for if the company loses, it will be as if the
management's defence has already been rejected. Wolverhampton & Dudley
will, as a consequence, be that much more reluctant to raise its bid.
So it's a tough call. In the end, however, shareholders would be wise
to reject their management's proposals. There is likely to be more value
realised by allowing the bid process to run its course than by obstructing
it at this early stage.
- 1 I was a Woman Against Feminism too
- 2 Fifty Shades of Grey movie trailer released: First look at Jamie Dornan as Christian Grey
- 3 Is Gideon Levy the most hated man in Israel or just the most heroic?
- 4 Students offered grants if they tweet pro-Israeli propaganda
- 5 The Tory donor whose firm is one of Britain’s biggest tax avoiders - with HMRC's blessing
Vladimir Putin employs a full-time food taster to ensure his meals aren't poisoned
Peaches Geldof: Her final day – and her fatal decision
Students offered grants if they tweet pro-Israeli propaganda
Israel-Gaza conflict: Israel may have committed war crimes, says UN human rights chief
Taiwan plane crash: Typhoon Matmo could have caused TransAsia Airways disaster, airline suspects
Malaysia Airlines MH17 crash: Vladimir Putin is given 'one last chance' to end hostilities in Ukraine
The 'scroungers’ fight back: The welfare claimants battling to alter stereotypes
The truth about conspiracy theories is that some require considering
Arizona execution lasts two hours as killer Joseph Wood left 'snorting and gasping' for air
Malaysia Airlines MH17 crash: Ukrainian military jet was flying close to passenger plane before it was shot down, says Russian officer
Malaysia Airlines MH17 crash: Massive rise in sale of British arms to Russia
iJobs Money & Business
£18000 - £20000 per annum + OTE £25K: SThree: SThree Group has been well estab...
competitive: Progressive Recruitment: This really is a fantastic chance to joi...
£40000 - £60000 per annum + BONUS + BENEFITS: Harrington Starr: CXL, Triple Po...
£60000 - £75000 per annum + BONUS + BENEFITS: Harrington Starr: Business Anal...