Outlook: Satchell flexes muscles and overpays
Wednesday 19 August 1998
On the first score, Friends is certainly paying a very full price; the stock market would be wrong to assume Britannic, or any of the others that might seem to make a better fit, is prepared to bid more. L & M has been hawking itself around all this year. Having spoken to three or four prospective suitors, this was the best price it could come up with.
On the second question, Keith Satchell, chief executive of Friends, stresses the benefits of putting together his own direct sales force with L & M's home services business, the staff of 800 it employs to go from door to door collecting premiums. In truth, however, these are quite different businesses, appealing to widely different income groups. It is not clear the synergies, or the scope for cost cuts, are that great. There does seem to be logic in merging the two corporate pensions operations, which tap into different areas of the IFA market, but whether that is of itself enough to justify the bid premium, is a moot point.
Certainly if Friends was a proprietary company, Mr Satchell might have had difficulty in selling this deal to his own shareholders. As it is, he doesn't really have to answer to anyone. The bull market in equities has given him the capital necessary to do this deal, he doesn't have to consult his policy holders and there's even a limit on what regulators can do to interfere in his deal making.
Friends has itself long been thought a potential target for a proprietary company, and it's hard to resist the conclusion that this takeover is essentially defensive in nature. Life assurance, as much as any sector, has entered a bid or be bid for phase, so Mr Satchell can hardly be blamed for wanting to get his shots in early. In many respects, it's good to see a mutual flexing its muscles in this way and showing a bit of ambition. This is Mr Satchell's second big takeover, the first being Ivory & Sime.
All the same, mutuality is no protection against the consequences of overpaying, and if that is indeed what Mr Satchell is doing, then policy holders won't thank him for it.
- 1 All Blacks Aaron Cruden misses New Zealand flight after drinking session, has brilliant excuse
- 2 Kim Kardashian 'nude photos' leaked on 4chan weeks after Jennifer Lawrence scandal
- 3 'F*ck it, I quit': TV reporter Charlo Greene quits live on air in spectacular fashion
- 4 Alicia Keys leaks nude photo 'to create a kinder and more peaceful world'
- 5 Clothes store Joy angers mental health campaigners with Twitter exchange on bipolar disorders
Scotland could still declare independence – even without referendum, says Alex Salmond
Scottish referendum results: Cross-party consensus collapses amid Tory-Labour spat on the 'English question'
Hilary Mantel 'should be investigated by police' over Margaret Thatcher assassination story, says Lord Bell
Scottish independence: David Cameron is becoming the 'George Bush of Britain'
Plebgate MP Andrew Mitchell called officer a 'little s**t', claim court documents 'exposing ex-Chief Whip's 'record of abusing police'
Archbishop of Canterbury admits doubts about existence of God
iJobs Money & Business
£20000 - £25000 per annum + OTE £40,000: SThree: SThree are a global FTSE 250 ...
£20000 - £25000 per annum + OTE £40000: SThree: As a Recruitment Consultant, y...
£20000 - £25000 per annum + OTE £40,000: SThree: SThree Group have been well e...
Up to £80000: Saxton Leigh: My client, a large commodities broker, is looking ...