Outlook: Satchell flexes muscles and overpays
Wednesday 19 August 1998
On the first score, Friends is certainly paying a very full price; the stock market would be wrong to assume Britannic, or any of the others that might seem to make a better fit, is prepared to bid more. L & M has been hawking itself around all this year. Having spoken to three or four prospective suitors, this was the best price it could come up with.
On the second question, Keith Satchell, chief executive of Friends, stresses the benefits of putting together his own direct sales force with L & M's home services business, the staff of 800 it employs to go from door to door collecting premiums. In truth, however, these are quite different businesses, appealing to widely different income groups. It is not clear the synergies, or the scope for cost cuts, are that great. There does seem to be logic in merging the two corporate pensions operations, which tap into different areas of the IFA market, but whether that is of itself enough to justify the bid premium, is a moot point.
Certainly if Friends was a proprietary company, Mr Satchell might have had difficulty in selling this deal to his own shareholders. As it is, he doesn't really have to answer to anyone. The bull market in equities has given him the capital necessary to do this deal, he doesn't have to consult his policy holders and there's even a limit on what regulators can do to interfere in his deal making.
Friends has itself long been thought a potential target for a proprietary company, and it's hard to resist the conclusion that this takeover is essentially defensive in nature. Life assurance, as much as any sector, has entered a bid or be bid for phase, so Mr Satchell can hardly be blamed for wanting to get his shots in early. In many respects, it's good to see a mutual flexing its muscles in this way and showing a bit of ambition. This is Mr Satchell's second big takeover, the first being Ivory & Sime.
All the same, mutuality is no protection against the consequences of overpaying, and if that is indeed what Mr Satchell is doing, then policy holders won't thank him for it.
- 1 What happens to your body when you give up sugar?
- 2 Licence fee: What is the BBC charge – and how will the changes affect you?
- 3 This is what the photographer has to say about the picture of a weasel riding a woodpecker
- 4 Delhi bus rapist blames dead victim for attack because 'girls are responsible for rape'
- 5 Have sex with your iPad thanks to the new sex toy no-one asked for
Bill Clinton portrait features Monica Lewinsky reference, artist admits
Japanese island overrun with cats after population explodes
Delhi bus rapist blames dead victim for attack because 'girls are responsible for rape'
Pornhub turns masturbation into energy in bid to save the planet
The 'sex selfie stick' lets you FaceTime the inside of a vagina
'Jihadi John': CAGE representative storms off Sky News accusing Kay Burley of Islamophobia
Durham Free School: 'Creationism taught at' free school facing closure
Ukip would cut billions from Scottish budget to fund English tax cuts
Nearly 100,000 of Britain's poorest children go hungry after parents' benefits are cut
End of the licence fee: BBC to back radical overhaul of how it is funded
Ukraine crisis: Top Chinese diplomat backs Putin and says West should 'abandon zero-sum mentality'
iJobs Money & Business
£15000 - £18000 per annum: Recruitment Genius: This is a great opportunity for...
£50000 - £60000 per annum + Excellent Salary: Austen Lloyd: An outstanding new...
£20000 - £21000 per annum + uncapped commission: SThree: As a graduate you are...
£25000 - £30000 per annum + benefits: Ashdown Group: A global leader operating...