Ruling leaves Forte battle in air
Thursday 21 December 1995
One of the most contentious issues in the pounds 3.3bn hostile bid by Granada for Forte was left hanging in the air last night, following a High Court ruling that the Council of Forte could make up its own mind about how to bid its 50 per cent voting stake.
According to the ruling, the council - which holds just 0.08 per cent of the shares but half the votes - can accept or reject the Granada offer, or it can step aside and let ordinary shareholders decide Forte's fate.
It was widely speculated, however, that the Takeover Panel would force the council onto the sidelines if it decided on anything but neutrality. Granada is planning to seek additional guidance from the panel.
eanwhile, Forte yesterday strengthened its still-tenuous defence by announcing it had raised a net pounds 108m from the sale of its US Travelodge hotel chain -- just ahead of most expectations. The deal, which brings to pounds 1.1bn the sum that Forte has raised from disposals, came as the troubled negotiations for the sale of the White Hart hotel chain failed to rekindle. Forte said the talks, which stalled when a financing partner in the purchasing group bowed out, would resume in the new year.
Analysts said Forte's refusal to accept a sharp reduction in the sale price of the White Hart chain was an encouraging sign that the company would not engage in a fire sale of assets.
Forte, headed by Sir Rocco Forte, trumpeted the sale of the Travelodge properties to HFS, the economy hotel franchising company, as proof it was managing the company effectively.
Granada responded that the disposal came after several years' of investment in the chain, and that the price might have been higher had Forte waited. "This is not necessarily the best time to be selling these assets," an insider said. Analysts were likewise concerned that the White Hart sale was coming at a bad time. "There are plenty of similar assets on the market," one analyst said.
The battle is expected to continue in the new year, with both sides jockeying for advantage. Analysts said yesterday that Granada would have to raise its initial offer to win.
In addition, there were signs in the City of frustration with what one analyst called Granada's "sound bite" campaign. He claimed that the company did not provide adequate detail of its plans to cut up to pounds 100m out of Forte's annual costs, and that it wrongly characterised Forte's cost structure.
- 2 ALS ice bucket challenge co-founder Corey Griffin drowns aged 27
- 3 Cilla Black defends Cliff Richard: 'I am positive that the allegations are without foundation'
- 4 Nicki Minaj finally releases predictable 'Anaconda' video
- 5 James Foley 'beheading': Met police warn public watching murder video could be criminal offence
Scottish independence: English people overwhelmingly want Scotland to stay in the UK
Isis threat: Cameron wants an alliance with Iran
Crisis? What crisis? A visiting US doctor gives the NHS a rave review
Michael Brown shooting: Chaos erupts on the streets of Ferguson after autopsy shows teenager was shot six times – twice in the head
Richard Dawkins on babies with Down Syndrome: 'Abort it and try again. It would be immoral to bring it into the world'
Scottish Independence Referendum: Salmond described as 'arrogant, ambitious and dishonest' by Scottish women
iJobs Money & Business
£45000 per annum: Harrington Starr: Quantitative Analyst (Financial Services, ...
Negotiable: Harrington Starr: Application Support Engineer (C++, .NET, VB, Per...
£450 - £600 per day: Harrington Starr: AIFMD Business Analyst / Consultant - I...
£450 - £600 per day: Harrington Starr: Business Analyst Solvency II SME (Pilla...