SFA risk-rating system queried by Large
Friday 11 April 1997
Under the SFA's new regime, the 1,370 firms it regulates will be rated on a scale of one to five based on the level of risk involved in their operations and the quality of their management controls.
The new system will be used to determine how tightly firms are regulated, how often they are inspected and how much capital they must put up to cover the exposure in particular markets. Individual firms will be informed of their ratings this summer.
But in a speech to businessmen in Cardiff earlier this week, Sir Andrew, who as SIB chairman is in overall charge of regulating the financial services industry, pointed to some of the drawbacks of such a system and the dangers of misinterpretation.
Sir Andrew said: "If we make judgements about the riskiness in firms how will we find the right way to inform firms about how risky we think they are, when we have carried out our risk assessment? Feedback to the firm on the key points of the assessment is essential. But should this be done formally through some form of rating or risk profile? And if so, should the firm be told precisely what it is? And what about the public? Regulatory assessments can easily be misunderstood - one shudders to think of the systemic effect of a run on a bank as a result of an ambiguous regulatory assessment. We need to consider similar issues for non-bank firms."
SIB sources stressed it was strongly in favour of weighting the system of regulation so that firms perceived as being more risky were monitored more closely, visited more regularly and required to put up more capital.
But they were sceptical about using a formulaic rating system. "There are difficulties with categorising a firm from one to five because there is no single number that can encapsulate everything," one said.
The SIB is also thought to be concerned about firms using their SFA rating as a marketing tool to attract clients.
An SFA spokesman stressed that the purpose of the rating system was to enable it to decide internally how much attention it needed to pay to individual firms.
The SFA system rates firms in five categories - financial stability, quality of systems and internal control, business, supervisory complexity and quality of personnel and management. Although the SIB is responsible for supervising the work of the SFA, the Financial Services Act gives all the self-regulatory organisations in the City independence from one another and the SIB.
- 1 East 17 bandmember Brian Harvey in 'very desperate situation’
- 2 Is this bridge haunted by the ghost of nu rave?
- 3 Woman filmed launching racist tirade against men on the Tube for speaking in 'own lingo'
- 4 The West has it totally wrong on Lee Kuan Yew
- 5 Scientists have discovered a simple way to cook rice that dramatically cuts the calories
East 17 bandmember Brian Harvey in 'very desperate situation’
Vladimir Putin says Russia will fight for the right of Palestinians to their own state
Is this bridge haunted by the ghost of nu rave?
Woman filmed launching racist tirade against men on the Tube for speaking in 'own lingo'
Saudi Arabia says it won't rule out building nuclear weapons
Ukip supporters are 55 or older, white and socially conservative, finds British Social Attitudes Report
JK Rowling responds to fan tweeting she 'can't see' Dumbledore being gay
Jeremy Clarkson sacked live: Alan Yentob 'wouldn't rule out' ex Top Gear host's BBC return
David Cameron calls Labour 'hopeless, sneering socialists' while announcing 7-day NHS plans
The West has it totally wrong on Lee Kuan Yew
Revealed: Putin's army of pro-Kremlin bloggers
iJobs Money & Business
Negotiable: Recruitment Genius: To provide a prompt, friendly and efficient se...
Negotiable: Recruitment Genius: You will be the first point of contact for all...
£18000 - £24000 per annum + benefits: Ashdown Group: HR, Payroll & Benefits Of...
£35000 - £38000 per annum + benefits : Ashdown Group: A highly successful, int...