Shell discovers customer care, but will it work?
Wednesday 01 October 1997
The inability of the oil majors to make a living out of selling petrol despite the remarkable degree of price uniformity between them always was one of capitalism's minor mysteries. The rise of the supermarkets as a dominant force in petrol retailing has stripped away some of the mystique but in the process it has made the business even more unprofitable for the incumbent operators.
Shell's response, as fleshed out yesterday by the top brass on a visit to one of their sites on the North Circular, is to go for a mixture of cost-cutting, acquisitions and better customer service. The cost cutting bit is not new - BP and Mobil have already taken the axe to their downstream oil marketing operations and Shell is doing likewise axing nearly 3,000 jobs across Europe.
Nor is the strategy of growth by acquisition very novel. Shell apparently regards a 20 per cent market share as the minimum necessary for critical mass. The depressing bit is that it doubts whether it can achieve that target other than through taking over stations from other operators such as Gulf.
The interesting part of the strategy is Shell's decision to go back to serving its customers through quaint initiatives like putting extra staff onto the forecourts to fill up the tanks, wipe clean the windscreen and check the oil.
The return to personalised service is a fad running through many sectors at the moment, notably supermarkets. But it is not obvious why it should work in petrol retailing. The supermarkets, who now collectively sell more petrol in Britain than anyone else, make a powerful case for the argument that motorists buy on price and little else. For Tesco, Sainsbury and Asda it is a loss leader to get the customer into the supermarket aisles.
Shell, which has turned many of its forecourts into mini-shopping malls, believes it can reverse this trend with its customer care initiative. In the end, however, it is hard to see how it can beat the supermarkets.
The economics simply do not stack up. For every pounds 1 a motorist spends on petrol, 76p goes in tax and fuel costs account for another 17p. That leaves 7p to cover overheads. Shell needs to halve that to make a profit but the customer care initiative is likely to increase costs. Throwing extra staff at customers looks an odd way of going about saving money and staying in the game.
- 1 Howard Jacobson: Let's see the 'criticism' of Israel for what it really is
- 2 Gingers face extinction due to climate change, scientists warn
- 4 BBC’s new Game of Thrones slayer 'The Last Kingdom' relies on Saxon appeal, creators say
- 5 PornHub begs users to stop uploading video clips of Brazil getting beaten 7-1
Game of Thrones author George RR Martin says 'f*** you' to fans who fear he will die before finishing Westeros saga
Jennifer Lawrence face palms Emma Watson at Christian Dior show in Paris
Gingers face extinction due to climate change, scientists warn
Pamplona Running of the Bulls 2014: Briton critically injured in San Fermin festival
Israel's deadliest Gaza air strikes yet kill five children from same family as Palestinian rocket barrage continues
Sustained immigration has not harmed Britons' employment, say government advisers
British jihadist calls for 'flag of Islam' over Downing Street and Buckingham Palace
Australia facing international condemnation after turning around Sri Lankans at sea
7/7 memorial defaced on anniversary of 2005 attacks with ‘Blair lied thousands died’ graffiti
Even when it brutalises one of its own teenage citizens, America is helpless against Israel
There’s a nasty smell in the political air – and it’s coming from the Tories
iJobs Money & Business
£40000 - £45000 per annum: Harrington Starr: A Global Financial Service Organ...
£50000 - £60000 per annum: Harrington Starr: Linux Systems Administrator - UNI...
£40000 - £45000 per annum: Harrington Starr: UNIX Systems Administrator - Orac...
£40000 - £55000 per annum: Harrington Starr: Linux Systems Administrator - (Su...