Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Sweb puts pounds 35m computer on ice

Chris Godsmark
Thursday 30 January 1997 00:02 GMT
Comments

Sweb, the regional electricity company, has postponed plans to build a controversial pounds 35m computer billing system, designed to cope with the introduction of domestic power competition, until 2000 and could even abandon them.

The decision to scale down the project, managed by the computer giant IBM, comes after Sweb's partner in the venture, its Welsh counterpart Swalec, pulled out of development work late last year. Hyder, the multi- utility group which owns Swalec, blamed mounting delays and the alarming increase in costs.

Derek Lickorish, Sweb's director of customer service, said the group would concentrate on updating its existing computer systems and would be unlikely to make a final decision about the project, called Croeso, until the millennium. The move, disclosed in today's edition of Computer Weekly magazine, leaves Southern Electric as the only UK utility still pursuing the project.

Mr Lickorish said: "To introduce a new system at the same time as implementing competition in 1998 was such a massive undertaking that to me the risks were too great. The safest route is to amend our existing systems."

He declined to put a figure on the extra cost for Sweb and said estimates that Croeso would cost the three partners a total of pounds 100m were "absolute nonsense". However Mr Lickorish said: "It will cost us several million pounds. We are still evaluating the additional cost."

Croeso was announced in 1992 in a fanfare of publicity as a system which would link every aspect of customer information on to a single screen, linked to telephone inquiry staff. The complex software would track customers as they moved to different suppliers after competition was introduced. Similar systems have been built by IBM for US utilities for an average of $50m (pounds 31m).

Last night there was speculation that IBM would be left with a substantial loss on the project.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in