View from City Road: Closer look at the regulators overdue
Tuesday 13 September 1994
All 12 regional electricity companies were so delighted by Professor Littlechild's review that they virtually bit his hand off in their eagerness to accept. The new deal was far, far more lenient than they, their advisers or the City had expected. Though Mr Byatt was more helpful in explaining his methodology, the same might be said of his review. Only one of the big water and sewerage companies, South West, has appealed to the Monopolies and Mergers Commission, and this only because his methodology had an abnormally harsh effect on South West when set against the others.
In defence of regulators, it has to be said they are on a bit of a hiding to nothing when it comes to protecting consumer interests. Whatever they decide, it is never going to be enough for the customer. Furthermore, regulators are required by Act of Parliament to ensure that enough revenue is raised to maintain quality of service, provide finance for investment and allow an appropriate level of return for investors. Within those parameters, however, there is plenty of scope for juggling. Just what is an appropriate level of return, and in deciding it, what can the regulator assume about the scope for cost-cutting in a company? If cost-cutting potential is underestimated, as it appears to have been in the electricity and water reviews, what might seem appropriate can be boosted with ease to become spectacularly inappropriate.
Plainly, tough questions need to be asked about whether regulators are striking the right balance between the interests of consumers and shareholders. The American system, whereby any price change in the water and electricity industries has to be vetted by full public inquiry, might seem an administratively clumsy and costly alternative. By the same token, our own system of largely unaccountable regulation needs urgent attention if it is to regain public respect.
- 2 'Don't blame all men for rape' campaign backfires spectacularly
- 3 Isis burns woman alive for refusing to engage in 'extreme' sex act, UN says
- 5 Charlie Charlie Challenge explained: not a Mexican demon being summoned — it's gravity
UK's biggest male rape charity Survivors UK has state funding slashed to zero despite 120% rise in men reporting sexual violence and seeking help
Iran launches anti-Isis cartoon competition 'to expose true nature of Islamic State'
Priest warns pupils the 'Charlie Charlie Challenge' is 'demonic activity'
Tinder and Grindr dating apps blamed for surge in cases of HIV, syphilis and other STDs
Fifa corruption arrests: Sepp Blatter 'quite relaxed' and confident he is 'not involved'
EU referendum: David Cameron's rules are a 'democratic disgrace', says French-born Scottish politician set to be denied a vote
The day that Britain resigned as a global power
SNP fury as HS2 finds 'no business case' for taking fast train service to Scotland
A nation of inequality: How the UK is failing to feed its most vulnerable people
Australian man punched in the face for defending Muslim women from abuse on train
EU referendum: David Cameron to deny EU migrants and under-18s the chance to vote
iJobs Money & Business
£20000 - £25000 per annum + OTE £45K YR1: SThree: At SThree, we like to be dif...
£20000 - £25000 per annum + competitive: SThree: Did you know? SThree is a mul...
£55 - 65k (DOE): Guru Careers: A unique opportunity for a permanent C# Develop...
£16 - 20k: Guru Careers: A Graduate Editor / Editorial Assistant is needed to ...