Vita beats forecasts
Tuesday 07 March 1995
Taxable profits for 1994 recovered from £33.7m to £49.5m, £4m to £5m above most projections. The shares, which have been unsettled over concern about chemicals producers lifting prices, rose 22p to 234p.
The City's concern about chemical producers pushing to increase profits margins was allayed by Rod Sellers, chief executive. He said: "Margin pressures are a fact of life.
"We've been successful in passing on most of the raw material price increases, while new products and technologies have helped to mitigate some of the pressures."
Group profit margins in the last quarter of 1994 were 6.3 per cent. "That gave profits that extra twitch the City hasn't been expecting," Mr Sellers said.
Analysts believe British Vita will continue to recover and make profits of at least £55m this year.
The final dividend for 1994 is 3.95p, raising the total payout from 7.4p to 7.7p.
- 1 What happens to your body when you give up sugar?
- 2 Have sex with your iPad thanks to the new sex toy no-one asked for
- 3 The 'sex selfie stick' lets you FaceTime the inside of a vagina
- 4 Why you're almost certainly more like your father than your mother
Durham Free School: 'Creationism taught at' free school facing closure
Nearly 100,000 of Britain's poorest children go hungry after parents' benefits are cut
End of the licence fee: BBC to back radical overhaul of how it is funded
Nigel Farage promises Ukip will not 'stigmatise' would-be migrants – and says he wants 'everyone to speak the same language'
Ex-head of MI6: 'We shouldn't kid ourselves that Russia is on a path to democracy'
Most people think legal tax avoidance is just as wrong as illegal tax evasion, poll suggests
iJobs Money & Business
£8 per hour: Recruitment Genius: This Pension Specialist was established early...
£30 - 35k + Bonus & Benefits: Guru Careers: We are seeking an Executive Assist...
£25000 - £30000 per annum + benefits: Ashdown Group: A global leader operating...
Voluntary post, reasonable expenses reimbursed: Reach Volunteering: Would you ...