`Cruelty-free' fox hunting finds no favour
Andrew Grice has been Political Editor of The Independent since 1998. He was previously Political Editor of The Sunday Times, where he worked for 10 years, and he has been a Westminster-based journalist since 1982. His column, Inside Politics, appears in The Independent each Saturday.
Wednesday 04 August 1999
Government sources dismissed the plan, put forward yesterday by the all- party Middle Way group of MPs, as a backdoor way of ensuring that hunting continues. They said it would not meet Tony Blair's pledge to outlaw the sport.
The MPs proposed that hunts should apply for a licence, which could be withdrawn if it carried out barbaric practices, such as dogs "digging out" a terrified fox underground. Hunts which refused to adopt a new code of conduct would be refused a licence.
"We are trying to create an environment which ends the worst excesses of animal treatment, at the same time as preserving the civil liberties of those who hunt," said Liberal Democrat MP Lembit Opik, a member of the group.
Jack Straw, the Home Secretary, will study the scheme but ministerial sources said last night that it did not go far enough. "It's not really a compromise, it is more like one side of the argument putting forward its views," said one source.
The pro-hunting Countryside Alliance, welcomed the MPs' proposal, but it was attacked by the League Against Cruel Sports, who said it would not prevent the chasing and deaths of foxes, deer and hare by packs of hounds.
David Coulthread, head of public affairs for the organisation, told BBC Radio 4 : "Nothing short of a full ban will be acceptable to an overwhelming majority of Labour MPs who have made it plain to Jack Straw that is what they expect."
Mr Straw, Mr Blair and other ministers will resume discussions next month and are expected to opt for a private member's bill rather than a government measure, because Mr Straw is reluctant to see his legislation overshadowed by a pitched Parliamentary battle over hunting. Ministers could ensure that a backbench bill won Commons approval by providing adequate Parliamentary time, but there would be a question mark over whether it would be passed by the House of Lords. Although the removal of most hereditary peers this autumn would curb the strong anti-hunting lobby in the Lords, some Labour peers oppose the move and the second chamber could delay the measure.
- 1 Howard Jacobson: Let's see the 'criticism' of Israel for what it really is
- 3 Belgium fan Axelle Despiegelaere lands L'Oreal campaign after World Cup viral photo
- 4 Britney Spears sings 'Alien' without Auto-Tune in embarrassingly brilliant leaked audio clip
- 5 PornHub begs users to stop uploading video clips of Brazil getting beaten 7-1
Game of Thrones author George RR Martin says 'f*** you' to fans who fear he will die before finishing Westeros saga
Instagram of US airport security chiefs: Lipstick knives and IED training kits among items seized
‘Ryan Gosling got someone pregnant and it's not me. Brazil you think you’re devastated…’
Israel-Palestine crisis: ‘We just want it to end… We don’t deserve to live like this’
Israel-Palestine crisis: Eight killed in Gaza Strip cafe while watching World Cup semi-final
Sustained immigration has not harmed Britons' employment, say government advisers
Australia facing international condemnation after turning around Sri Lankans at sea
7/7 memorial defaced on anniversary of 2005 attacks with ‘Blair lied thousands died’ graffiti
Even when it brutalises one of its own teenage citizens, America is helpless against Israel
There’s a nasty smell in the political air – and it’s coming from the Tories
Vanessa Feltz criticises 'vile' reaction to Rolf Harris allegations
£60000 - £75000 per annum: Harrington Starr: Business Analyst Consultant (Fina...
£60000 per annum: Harrington Starr: A leading provider in investment managemen...
£600 - £700 per day: Harrington Starr: AVS, JVS Openlink Endur Developer JVS, ...
£45000 - £60000 per annum + competitive: Progressive Recruitment: Exciting opp...