Education

null 6° London Hi 5°C / Lo 0°C

A-level exams system is 'not fit for purpose'

Students just 'regurgitate knowledge' warns head of inquiry into exams reform

By Richard Garner, Education Editor
Wednesday, 8 October 2008

A-level exams are about 'regurgitating knowledge' and resits should be banned, says Sir Mike Tomlinson

Getty

A-level exams are about 'regurgitating knowledge' and resits should be banned, says Sir Mike Tomlinson

A-levels "strangle scholarship" and are not "fit for purpose" in preparing students for university, according to Sir Mike Tomlinson, who led a government inquiry into exam reform.

The former chief schools inspector who headed an inquiry into the future of secondary education, told a conference in London yesterday that there were "searching questions" to be answered about the exam.

"At the moment it is strangling scholarship and reducing students to identifying key points that collect marks rather than sustain argument," he said. The exam was just about "regurgitating knowledge".

He called for a massive reduction in the number of resits for pupils – possibly leading to an outright ban – and a return to the days of the terminal examination at the end of the two-year course. At present, students sit four modules during the two years – each of which gain marks for the final A-level grade. They can retake modules if they wish. Sir Mike, who was speaking at a conference organised by the Higher Education Policy Institute – one of the country's leading university-level think-tanks – also called for more searching questions to be set, which would allow students to develop an argument and show creative thinking skills.

He said afterwards that too many students were retaking A-level modules to get higher marks even when their work had merited an A grade because it would help them impress admissions staff on sought-after university courses.

"There must be a reconsideration of resit arrangements," he said. "I'd like to see far fewer than we've got at the moment and I'd like to reduce it to perhaps none.

"I'd also like to revise it towards more of a subject-based exam where assessment rewards scholarship and not just producing the three words you know are going to get marks in answer to a question.

"An A-level in terms of what we expect of student ability is different to what it was when I did A-levels." However, he added, there had never been a "golden age" for A-levels.

As a result of his inquiry, Sir Mike recommended setting up an overarching diploma which would cover both the academic A-levels and GCSEs and new vocational qualifications. However, this was rejected by Tony Blair, who was prime minister at the time. The Government has now launched its own diplomas to run alongside A-levels which Ed Balls, the Schools Secretary, believes could eventually take over as the main route in education.

The Government has moved to strengthen A-levels by introducing an A* grade and tougher questions from this September. In addition, an extended essay project – to develop creative thinking skills – is now available to be sat alongside A-levels. It is worth an AS-level pass.

Meanwhile, Anthony McClaran, chief executive of UCAS, the body through which applications are processed for entry to higher education, told the same conference that universities were shunning the use of A-level marks and had voiced reluctance to use the new A* grade to differentiate between potential candidates.

Academics have said that using marks and A* grade passes could favour independent schools.

Mr McClaran added that – for the first time next year – students who had done better than expected in their A-levels would be given five days in which to apply for a course at a more prestigious university. Any existing offers would be held for them over this period.

Interesting? Click here to explore further

If the examination boards could get their own houses in order so as to avoid the yearly "rogue module" problem (where one of the "subjectively marked" papers like History, English, Classics etc is marked appallingly across the cohort, condemning students with A-grades in every other subject to E and U grades in one random module), then removing the option of re-sits would be welcomed.

Unfortunately, having been at training days with markers who struggle to understand the content of the curriculum, and at schools where superb candidates are reduced to tears at their one, unexplained, terrible grade, I feel pretty strongly that re-sits are a necessary evil.

Posted by Andie | 08.10.08, 20:16 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

Top universities are introducing entrance exams the test ability rather than rote learning to identify the brightest.

This will be seen as divisive by the left as a statistically significant number of people who pass these will be from the middle class. The left do not allow for the fact that there are fewer able students from the poor end of the spectrum. We all know politicians are hopeless and clueless at maths so will not understand this aspect. Nature and nurture favours the middle class see "We can't all make the grade" at standpointmag.

Posted by Derek Emery | 08.10.08, 18:20 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

True, but difficult to Practice in present "Time", the Life style during
Mike Tomlison times had less Distractions and peer effect, not forgetting the Desire to Grow Rich/Popular, is within every students reach,(which could be achieved with short-cut/s). Why would
average intelligent Not take A shot? Mix the previous wisdom with
present is the Need.

Posted by Mohan.Dudani | 08.10.08, 16:18 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

A levels modules are not retaken to "impress admissions staff".
Because of the modular nature of the exam over 2 years and the fact that university entry is based upon conditional grades , It pays students to resit all AS modules in order to maximize the overall final mark and therefore the chances of achieving an A grade overall.

Posted by M Collyer | 08.10.08, 14:23 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

Resits should be limited to one per module.

Posted by D | 08.10.08, 13:40 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

How is regurgitating knowledge different from understanding something? In real life they're the same thing.

Posted by Twiggins | 08.10.08, 13:14 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

Surely the probelm is only partially about the exams themselves. The problem is in the "dumbing down" of the degree level. Certainly in the exact sciences (maths, physics, etc), the level of education is reduced, resulting in term in universities having to reduce their levels of education. I see no reason why secondary school pupils now should be less clever than those a generation before. It is therefore time to increase the levels of education at secondary schools and as part of this adjust the type of questions asked in exams. This does require order and respect for the teacher, which urgently needs adressing as well.

Posted by RR | 08.10.08, 11:04 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

The problem is more to do with examinations requiring discursive writing that must include 'words' or concepts on the markers points list. It is not the fault of schools or students if they have learned how to maximise the results achieved. I think we really ought to examine why it is we put so much faith into these types of examinations instead of ensuring that students build robust knowledge and skills. Knowledge is a creative enterprise - we treat it as a form of accounting. No wonder we have problems.

Posted by JM | 08.10.08, 09:54 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

Not fit for purpose? I'm surprised anyone has noticed, given the continuing reassurances that standards have neither fallen nor exams 'dumbed down'. No doubt Tomlinson will issue a retraction, once he has discussed matters with Buggins Brown and realised how badly he misunderstood the findings of the inquiry which, of course, clearly contradict those reassurances.

Posted by m collins | 08.10.08, 09:27 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

The so called Equality and Diversity Unit in the Dept of education have encouraged teachers to bring "anti racism" into maths ("pupils to calculate the living area available to Blacks in South Africa and compare this with the living space of whites" or "plot graphs showing life expectancy of blacks and whites in Africa"), in science - "study the materials used in constructing a typical traditional gypsy caravan" or "how many great scientists were women?" and "electric light invented by black man". No wonder the exam results are not fit for purpose.

Posted by Dr Stuart H Russell | 08.10.08, 09:07 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details