Education

9° London Hi 12°C / Lo 6°C

Battle for healthy school food is struggling

By Chris Green

Jamie Oliver launched his campaign to get schoolchildren eating healthily in 2005

Channel 4

Jamie Oliver launched his campaign to get schoolchildren eating healthily in 2005

Before TV chef Jamie Oliver's campaign to get schoolchildren eating healthily in 2005, most people had no idea what a Turkey Twizzler was. The demon foodstuff has since become synonymous with the Government's fight to wean pupils off junk food – a fight it appears to be losing.

Figures published yesterday by the School Food Trust (SFT) show that a majority of pupils are still turning up their noses at the healthy options espoused by Oliver and the Government, preferring to bring their own packed lunches or buy junk food outside the school grounds.

Only 43 per cent of primary school children are eating school dinners, a rise of just 0.1 per cent on last year. Among secondary pupils the figures are even worse, with just 36 per cent opting to eat at school, an increase of just 0.5 per cent.

The statistics mean that Government targets will be missed by a huge margin. In 2006 the Government said it wanted to increase the take-up of school dinners in England by 10 per cent by this autumn. Jim Knight, who was schools minister at the time, called it a "priority" for his department.

Yesterday, the SFT's chairwoman, Prue Leith, said Mr Knight's targets had been "totally unrealistic" and that it was impossible to "change the diet of a nation in 10 minutes".

Christine Haigh, of the Children's Food Campaign, said the figures showed that "far too many children are not yet eating a healthy lunch", and that the only way to drastically increase the number of pupils eating the meals was to offer them for free. A spokesman added that some schools had been "too casual" about marketing the new healthier options to students.

Research last year by London Metropolitan University's nutrition policy unit found that large numbers of children were still buying food from local shops which were high in calories and sugar.

The picture is even grimmer in Scotland, where last month it emerged that the number of secondary pupils eating school meals had fallen to its lowest level in a decade, from more than 50 per cent in 2003 to 39 per cent this year.

The drop was triggered by the Scottish Government's decision to introduce healthier menus in 2002, with pupils evidently shunning the new options in favour of buying burgers, chips and pizzas elsewhere.

The Liberal Democrats' schools spokesman, David Laws, said the Government had missed its target by "well over one million children".

He said: "The Government stands little chance of meeting its targets unless there is both more investment in the school meals service and a massive change in expectations."

In 2006, ministers banned junk food from school canteens and vending machines after Jamie Oliver's campaign gained huge public support. Chocolate, crisps, fizzy drinks and poor-quality meats were replaced with healthier options such as chicken and fish. Deep-fried foods were restricted to two portions a week.

Stricter nutritional guidelines were made compulsory in primary schools last year, with similar rules set to be introduced in secondaries this September.

In 2006, 42 per cent of primary pupils and 42 per cent of secondary pupils were eating school meals – more than today – but the SFT said the figures were not comparable due to changes in the way the statistics are collected.

Post a Comment

View all comments that have been posted about this article.

Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.

Comments

There's not a lot a Government can do
[info]brumbar wrote:
Thursday, 9 July 2009 at 07:47 pm (UTC)
if people eat crap food either through inverted snobbery or laziness. They could take a leaf out of McDonalds book. Thinking long term, and probably having spent a fortune on behavioural psychiatrists, the concentrated on children's parties, with balloons etc. so that as children grew up they would subconsciously associate eating Big Macs with having fun. Consumers for life, though a rather short one.
[info]wrighty55 wrote:
Thursday, 9 July 2009 at 08:04 pm (UTC)
Hey , if the kids want to eat unhealthy, fat laden food let them . They might developed diabetes or any other obesity reacted illness at an early age but hey , natural selection has to work in the modern age somehow . We do need to tax the hell out of fatty foods though , the NHS needs extra funding to look after all the fatties
not such a bad thing
[info]wrighty55 wrote:
Thursday, 9 July 2009 at 08:06 pm (UTC)
also ... if the fatties die off earlier then would be way more food for the rest of us !
Re: not such a bad thing
[info]tommytcg wrote:
Thursday, 9 July 2009 at 10:37 pm (UTC)
We are fed this junk food misinformation based on a faulty conclusion in a 1953 Framingham Massachusetts USA study that blamed diertasry cholesterol the culprit. The gatekeepers of big industry and big farma will not let it go, as it generates massive profits,(ie the 24 billion $ statin fraud). Healthy eating bears no resemblance to the regurgitated lies given out such as cholesterol, calories, food-pyramids, healthy soy and so on. Science moved ahead, but the faulty advice stayed.. Pioneers such as R.Atkns, R.Passwater, L.Pauling, H R Calrk etc are ignored, and we have have asickly population trying to follow nonsensical guidelines. These being taught all the way from Med school by Nutrition professors who should know better, but must teach what is in the book.
school meals
[info]h1l2e3elm wrote:
Friday, 10 July 2009 at 07:44 am (UTC)

It's time we abolished chind benefit & instead gave evry child a free school lunch. You may not be able to buck the market but you can certainly use it!
Schoo Dinners are not healthy
[info]rdrwit wrote:
Friday, 10 July 2009 at 08:16 am (UTC)
We used to buy school dinners for our children thinking that they were getting a healthy meal, then they invited parents to sample them, apparently they made a special effort but it was awful.
It consisted mainly of cheap carbs. Salmon flan with one tiny flake of fish, one slice of carrot, potatos, bread and pudding.
Our children now take a packed lunch and are slimmer, fitter and happier.
prmary vs secondary
[info]artsit_e wrote:
Friday, 10 July 2009 at 08:43 am (UTC)
I agree that primary students should be given healthy food. But secondary schools should not have canteens, why should they ? they can buy thier own food from cafes or bring a lunch, learn to be grown up rather than just provided for. if they choose ot be unhealthy they will regret it.
Think about university students too
[info]winterrrr wrote:
Friday, 10 July 2009 at 09:53 pm (UTC)
I've got no experience with school food in the UK, but had the pleasure of living in a "catered" hall for 9 months when at university. Nowhere in my life have I had two kinds of potatoes served to me in the same meal. And this was a regular feature. Supplemented by cauliflower boiled to mush.
A Successful School with Healthy School Dinners
[info]wooly44 wrote:
Tuesday, 14 July 2009 at 11:41 am (UTC)
Catering4Schools is an initiative run by a school and its pupils in Harrogate, North Yorkshire.

The St. Aidan's catering enterprise now serves an average of 1,800 meals per day and currently employs 4 commercially trained Chefs, a Baker, a Dietitian, 23 Catering Assistants, an Administration Assistant and a Gardener to maintain the fruit and vegetable garden.

By envolving the students they have had huge increases in school meal uptake. The website also provided information and recipies to primary and secondary schools.
Healthy eating and your blood pressure
[info]don_jolly wrote:
Friday, 17 July 2009 at 10:43 am (UTC)
High blood pressure is often associated with age but it can affect the young too.

Many people don't realise how healthy eating can help lower blood pressure.

It is reckoned that utting down on salt and eating no more than 6g a day could lower blood pressure by 2-8mmHg.

A 10kg weight loss could help to lower your blood pressure by 5-10mmHg

Most popular