Education

Rain (AM and PM) 5° London Hi 9°C / Lo 7°C

Ed Balls: Twitter talk is nonsense

History will remain firmly on the curriculum for primary pupils, Schools Secretary Ed Balls will tell today in a bid to quash claims they could be taught internet skills instead.

Mr Balls will dismiss as "complete nonsense" reports that teachers would be forced to choose between teaching about the Victorians or how to use Wikipedia and Twitter.

In a speech to today's Association of Teachers and Lecturers annual conference he will reveal details of one recommendation of a review by Sir Jim Rose, due to be published within weeks.

"The idea that primary school children will learn how to use Twitter and about social networking instead of learning about the Victorians and the Tudors is just complete nonsense," he will say.

"It's right that independent reviews like Sir Jim's are carried out at arms-length from Ministers. But in the end, we are accountable. So let me put the record straight now.

"Sir Jim will recommend that one of the 6 new areas of learning should be called 'historical, geographical and social understanding' and we will accept his recommendation so that history will remain a central part of the primary curriculum."

He will add: "It's a complete nonsense to suggest that it's an either-or choice between learning history on the one hand; and learning ICT on the other."

He will conclude: "In the same way we have a duty to ensure our children learn about history we also have a duty to make sure they are not left in the technological dark ages - I believe good teachers are more than capable on ensuring the two things run alongside each other."

This article is from the Belfast Telegraph.

Post a Comment

View all comments that have been posted about this article.

Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.

Comments

Good for him
[info]owlqueen wrote:
Monday, 6 April 2009 at 09:49 am (UTC)
At last someone, somewhere, who recognises Twitter is just a fad! Balls is to be applauded for squashing this one flat and bolstering the teaching of history. It's time we stood up to academics who don't live in the real world and are perhaps somewhat ashamed of how Britain got where she was.
[info]asmodanus wrote:
Monday, 6 April 2009 at 10:17 am (UTC)
It would bdefinitely a wrong choice to make an "either-or" choice between history and ICT - they should be taught together and it seems rather stupid to thinks of that choice at all.
[info]asmodanus wrote:
Monday, 6 April 2009 at 10:18 am (UTC)
"Knowing nothing about your history leads to having no future" - i don't remember the author of the quote, but that is true - we should learn on the mistakes of the past to build the better future
It is true, but...
[info]gutmach wrote:
Monday, 6 April 2009 at 01:42 pm (UTC)
realize both youth and adults will spend a significant proportion of time on Internet-based social networks from now on, and without some guidance, they fall victim to issues such as cyberbullying (the US Congress is presenting a bill in this legislative session on that very issue). The teaching of history will always have value, but the reality is there is a limited amount of time in a school day. We must make important choices that will both shape and reflect the actual world our children will live in. As the saying goes, "if you keep doing things the way you always have, you'll keep getting the same results you always have."
Kids will teach themselves IT skills...
[info]student2010 wrote:
Wednesday, 8 April 2009 at 03:09 pm (UTC)
Is this not a bunch of out of touch seniors, not understanding the social need to be technically savvy amongst youngsters... ?

ICT lessons were always the most boring for myself, as we were never taught anything new, and often ended up correcting teachers, or teaching them a faster and more efficient way of doing something.

Graduated secondary school: 2005

Most popular