Education: Welcome to a lifetime of learning
Thursday 19 February 1998
But any suggestion that lifelong learning itself has somehow been elbowed out is mistaken. A buzz phrase maybe, but lifelong learning is here to stay, lasting well beyond the set of skills you learnt on your last training seminar. That's the point. There's no alternative in today's fast-moving hi-tech world, where skills need updating and people upskilling. If you're a car worker you get to grips with automation, travel agents keep abreast with databases, and if you're a vice-chancellor who started life as a linguist you retrain in financial and human resource management.
In the world of higher education we know all about lifelong learning - and we're good at it. For an academic, lifelong learning has never been just a desirable add-on; it is the foundation of your professional reputation and career. Whether through research, keeping up with the latest technological developments, progressing arguments through to publication, constantly coming to terms with new findings or even attending conferences in Tuscany, lifelong learning is the academic's stock-in-trade.
And as teachers we've got the message, too. The sector's new Institute for Learning and Teaching will encourage lecturers to develop their skills and exploit information technology to best effect.
It's worth remembering our own first-hand expertise in lifelong learning. We can even afford to get evangelical about it - we may have to. In the debate so far on lifelong learning the views of the "punters" - the lifelong learners themselves - have been strangely absent. Being upskilled isn't necessarily seen as a desirable option. People get tired; they work hard, bring up families. So as well as creating the necessary structures and providing the funding, there's also a selling job required.
That's where the evangelism comes in. For lifelong learning to succeed, people will have to believe that it benefits them individually, as well as society.
Of course, the opportunities have to be in place, not just the goodwill - and they have to be user-friendly, easy to locate and identify. Here the Government's University for Industry could play an invaluable role as a match-maker, bringing together individual learners with relevant courses and locating gaps where new programmes are required.
Lifelong learning should focus on two main groups of learners: those who secured their first round of qualifications, but now have to upgrade to survive in the job market, and those who missed out on getting qualified in the first place.
Our emphasis must always be on the learner. We can go on about the importance of high-level skills to global competitiveness, but if employers don't give employees time to upgrade their skills, we can forget it. Similarly, universities must be flexible, providing courses at the right time of day, and in places convenient for the learners.
At our lifelong learning conference next month we'll thrash out these issues. We'll look at widening participation by lower socio-economic groups, our partnerships with further education, work-based opportunities for learning and links with small and medium-sized companies.
In the run-up to the consultation paper much debate has focused on exactly where in the education sector lifelong learning should be located; or, to be more specific, who is going to get any funding that goes with it. But the crucial issue rests with the students. Will lifelong learning be worth their while? Universities and colleges must help to make it so.
Professor Martin Harris is vice-chancellor of the University of Manchester and Chairman of the Committee of Vice-Chancellors and Principals.
`The Independent' is sponsoring CVCP's conference, `Lifelong Learning: the Role of Universities', on Thursday 5 March at the Grosvenor House Hotel, London W1. For details, call Neil Stewart Associates (0171-222 1280).
Bill Clinton portrait features Monica Lewinsky reference, artist admits
Japanese island overrun with cats after population explodes
Delhi bus rapist blames dead victim for attack because 'girls are responsible for rape'
Pornhub turns masturbation into energy in bid to save the planet
The 'sex selfie stick' lets you FaceTime the inside of a vagina
'Jihadi John': CAGE representative storms off Sky News accusing Kay Burley of Islamophobia
Durham Free School: 'Creationism taught at' free school facing closure
Ukip would cut billions from Scottish budget to fund English tax cuts
Nearly 100,000 of Britain's poorest children go hungry after parents' benefits are cut
End of the licence fee: BBC to back radical overhaul of how it is funded
Ukraine crisis: Top Chinese diplomat backs Putin and says West should 'abandon zero-sum mentality'
- 1 What happens to your body when you give up sugar?
- 2 Licence fee: What is the BBC charge – and how will the changes affect you?
- 3 This is what the photographer has to say about the picture of a weasel riding a woodpecker
- 4 Delhi bus rapist blames dead victim for attack because 'girls are responsible for rape'
- 5 Have sex with your iPad thanks to the new sex toy no-one asked for
£20000 - £25000 per annum + OTE £40,000: SThree: SThree have recently been awa...
£45000 - £55000 per annum + 30 days holiday: Ashdown Group: Finance Manager - ...
expenses on shoots: WORLDbytes: Volunteering with a media based charity,for a ...
£90 - £140 per day: Tradewind Recruitment: A school in Tameside is currently l...