Failing schools told: improve or close
Tuesday, 10 June 2008
Hundreds of failing schools face being closed down or replaced with more privately-backed academies under a £400 million drive to raise standards of education, it was announced today.
jChildren's Secretary Ed Balls is doubling the cash available for the 638 secondary schools in England where more than 70% of teenagers fail to get five C grades in their GCSEs.
The "National Challenge" initiative will also see an expansion of the controversial academies programme, with up to 313 of the privately-sponsored schools set to be open by 2010.
Local authorities will be given a 50-day deadline to come up with a rescue plan for each of the schools on the Government's hit list.
But teachers warned that the plan must not set out to "name and shame" schools doing their best in tough areas.
Christine Blower, acting general secretary of the National Union of Teachers, said: "If Ed Balls is to provide meaningful support to the 638 secondary schools he has identified he has to lift the threat of school closure for failing to meet arbitrary targets.
"No headteacher or teacher mindful of their career will join a National Challenge school if they think it will be closed and turned into an academy in the following year."
Mary Bousted, general secretary of the Association of Teachers and Lecturers, said: "If the National Challenge does what it says on the tin - namely support these schools with increased resources, targeted assistance and, crucially, the brokering of local solutions between schools and local authorities - it has ATL's support.
"But if the National Challenge turns out to be more naming and shaming, a disgrace and failure of a policy, it will not improve school standards and the chances of the children in those schools."
The Government's target is for no state school to have fewer than 30% of their pupils gaining five C grades in subjects including maths and English by 2011.
In 1997, there were more than 1,600 such schools and now there are 638 but some comprehensives will have to see improve at double their current rate of progress if they are to meet the target.
Ministers have already promised that £200 million will be spent on the National Challenge scheme and Mr Balls will announce today that this is to be increased to £400 million.
Councils will be expected to draw up their plans for dealing with these failing schools.
They could set up an academy, sponsored and run by a private business figure, college or church group, or a new "super-trust".
This involves struggling schools being taken over by successful schools nearby and forming a partnership with a university or business.
Mr Balls said on the BBC Radio 4 Today programme: "I think we've shown, in the case of the academies programme, that schools that have been stuck with low results for a long period of time, a change of governance, a new partner - a university or a business - often a change of head, a new injection of funds, can really change aspirations and get the school on to a different track.
"The fact is - and this, I think, proves that you can break the link between poverty and attainment - that academies in the last few years have been taking intakes from more deprived areas, a move deprived intake than their area would suggest, and have faster rises in results than the average.
"I want to have more of that. So in the end, if it's the right thing to do, yes, we'll close the school, we start again as an academy or a trust with a change of governance, with a new partner."
-
Print Article
-
Email Article
-
Click here for copyright permissions
Copyright 2008 Independent News and Media Limited

Comments
21 Comments
Early intervention i say so this would not allow schools to reach the point of failing there is enough data available nowadays for interventions to be put in more support more specialist support in relation to SEN and the more vulnerable groups in my opinion the Government have some excellent ideas strategies to tackle certain problematic areas however in my opinion yet again LEAs are not implementing or the sharing of good practice is few and far between its not just about one specific area the bigger picture needs to be looked at for example ways in which to support hard to reach families more sign posting more communities working together to ensure better outcomes for children yet again we are concentrating on academics what happened to ensuring the right tailored made support for individuals good quality training in relation to disabilities lets first start to look at the exclusion rate the access and availability to relevant agencies in certain social deprived areas
Posted by angela kingston | 11.06.08, 20:49 GMT
why don't the government just close the schools instead of giving them a warning, the schools already had enough time to improve,like other countries, if you want your child to go to school the parent should pay. The worst bad behaved school in bristol is the city academy bristol.
Posted by stephanie dean | 11.06.08, 16:34 GMT
When we are all turned into 'academies' will this mean that we will improve so much we....................end up on this list like the other 26 academies on it??
How the bloody hell will I recruit into my continuously understaffed English Department now that we have been named and shamed then?!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Posted by AB | 11.06.08, 14:02 GMT
The quality of the intake needs to be taken into account. Labour needs to stop pretending that they can make a silk purse out of a sow's ear. It is time to tailor the expectations and education for children on their abilities and get away from 'one size fits all'. The average performance of a school is only relevant in the context of the average ability of the children. That other schools in an area where there are grammar schools perform less well is highly predictable because they are likely to contain less able pupils on average, but it is no intrinsic reason for concern.
The attempts to 'boost' the performance of less able children has resulted so far in grade hyperinflation and the invention of subjects unrecognised by many universities as having academic merit. This has been very damaging for many able children whose talents are swamped in a sea of mediocrity.
Posted by John | 11.06.08, 10:16 GMT
There are some valid viewpoints and constructive suggestions within these comments. Does The Independent review these comments and, if so, carry the intention of presenting them to the Government in some form?
Posted by Kerry | 11.06.08, 09:51 GMT
There are some valid viewpoints and constructive suggestions within these comments. Does The Independent review these comments and, if so, carry the intention of presenting them to the Government in some form?
Posted by Kerry | 11.06.08, 09:24 GMT
Educaytion, Education, Education should have read
Mediocrity, Mediocrity, Mediocrity because that is what we have now.
Each child is clever in their own way, some may be academic others may be vocational but to measure them all by the same scale is foolish.
It is about time that honesty returned to educatoin, some kids are obviiously not academic and other options should be available.
The governemt needs to realise that education is not just about passing exams, especially those which have be dumbed down so much they are meaningless.
Posted by Matin | 10.06.08, 20:00 GMT
A point of interest some children are "thick" and if all pass then the qualification is worthless and this is what has happened with A levels.
Education education education umm
Just look at the rest of Europe and see why GB is so far behind the rest of Europe.
Why should kids who cause the teachers and class problems still be kept in school. Ans the state has no idea what to do with them.
Teachers should teach and thus the bad kids need to be kept away from the classroom.
Many teachers spend time on the trouble makers and thus fail to teach the vast good kids in the class.
Logical and simple and what the rest of Europe carry out.
Typical Labour who will pay yep up the tax !!!
Just look at the off balance sheet PFI and the UK govt has no spare cash only massive future tax rises.
Another bad policy by a bad govt.
Posted by Jay | 10.06.08, 19:11 GMT
close the schools and then what?what is gonna happen to the pupils?ship to bahamas?
we are dealing with a bunch of lunatics who've been elected to govern us!!!!!
total and absolute madness is dripping from this government.the sooner the labour goes the better for this country.
Posted by ebbi britt | 10.06.08, 18:00 GMT
Schools cannot be labelled as failing if only the criteria of 30% grades A-C, including English and maths, is used. Some of these school have positive value added scores and have had good ofsted reports in the last 2 years. Many schools have an inclusion policy and are prepared to take a large proportion of S.E.N. and problem pupils. These pupils may not achieve C+ grades but do make very good progress. However they lower the school's average. Other schools have a backdoor selection policy and refuse difficult pupils They then get good average results. Teachers in the most difficult schools work ten times harder and then get demoralised as their schools are labelled as "failing" Students give up if their target grade is below a C because of adverse comments in press etc. So why was the GCSE (GRADES A* TO G) introduced in the first place if only grades C+ are considered worthwhile?
Posted by annette collins | 10.06.08, 17:55 GMT
21 Comments