GCSE results reveal 'two-tier' schools
Thursday, 21 August 2008
Labour is presiding over a return by stealth to the era of grammar and secondary modern schools, a study suggests today. Schools – including many of the Government's flagship academies – are switching from academic GCSE subjects to boost their rankings in league tables, according to the independent think-tank Civitas.
Results out today will confirm that thousands of teenagers are still leaving school without top- grade GCSE passes in maths and English. The results for 600,000 pupils will show an improvement in the percentage obtaining A* to C grade passes in maths and English – to about 56 per cent and 63 per cent respectively. However, that will still mean about 300,000 students fail to obtain top grades in both subjects, despite the Government's insistence that schools must publish their results in the basics.
Annette Brooke, the Liberal Democrat spokeswoman for children, said: "After 11 years of a Labour government, most young people are still failing to achieve five good GCSEs including maths and English. If we are going to have a world-class education system, we must do more to promote educational achievement, especially among the most disadvantaged children."
Schools are encouraged to move away from academic subjects because exams experts have ranked some vocational subjects as equivalent to four GCSE passes. "There is a grave danger that academic study is being reserved for the high performers, which will widen socio-economic divides," the Civitas report says.
"If this were to escalate, there is a very real possibility of a reversion to a system akin to the grammar/ secondary modern divide – though arguably in less meritocratic a form.
"That a purportedly equalising Labour government should be the architect of such a divide would be tragic irony. Significantly, though, it is all too apparent that it is the system which has lost interest in the pupils – largely because they run the risk of not delivering the right A* to C performance through academic GCSEs."
The report acknowledges that General National Vocational Qualifications, which were ranked as worth four GCSEs, have now been abolished. But it points out that some qualifications – such as the Edexcel BTEC first diploma – are still considered to be worthy of four passes.
It cites hitherto unpublished research by Roger Titcombe, a former headteacher, showing a disparaging gap between the number of pupils at some flagship academies obtaining five A* to C GCSE passes without maths and English, and the numbers when the two subjects are included. These include Marlowe Academy in Ramsgate, Kent, where the figures for last year were 39 per cent and 7 per cent, respectively, and Barnsley Academy (62 per cent and 20 per cent).
A breakdown of results by subjects showed no top grade passes at Marlowe in either history or geography, and very few in European languages. A similar picture emerged at Barnsley and the Greig Academy in Haringey, north London.
The Schools minister, Andrew Adonis, insisted the report's key findings were "wrong", saying: "The achievement gap between children from deprived backgrounds and the more affluent is closing. Just because a pupil is on free school meals does not mean they are destined to fail at school. Many schools in the most deprived areas are achieving excellent GCSE results."
He added: "It is ridiculous to suggest that performance tables are designed to meet government targets. For example, two years ago, we deliberately changed the tables to include achievement in English and maths. This brought about a big decline in reported performance but we made this change because it best served the needs of pupils, parents and employers."
Today's results are expected to see the number of A* or A grade passes rise to nearly 20 per cent for the first time. Last year, 19.5 per cent of pupils were awarded these grades. The overall pass rate, though, is set to remain the same at about 98 per cent.
-
Print Article
-
Email Article
-
Click here for copyright permissions
Copyright 2008 Independent News and Media Limited

It seems clear that 'spin' is still with us. There is less and less chance of anyone,from a less privileged background, being able to even obtain an academic education, let alone the qualifications to be able to better their socio-economic position in society. If Labour imagines that people acutally believe the 'spin' rather than their own experiences then, eventually, they will be in for a rude awakening.
Posted by A Giscombe | 23.08.08, 10:26 GMT
Given league tables it is inevitable that schools will adapt to 'raise' performance, particularly when the results of 'poor' performance can be draconian. 32 years in a tough urban comprehensive convinced me that league tables were counter productive. If you want a system that encourages people to cheat, this is it. What benefit does the school get from being rigorous when dealing with coursework? The biggest problem in urban comps is the large numbers of 'disturbed/damaged' children that have to be taught in large classes, often already filled with other children who have English as a second (if at all) language.
Grammar schools? Look at history, your chances of getting to grammar school often depended on where you lived. A talented friend who failed his 11+ is still scarred, 40 years later. Bring back secondary moderns? Never!
Posted by Norm | 23.08.08, 09:34 GMT
What makes me laugh really, is the statistics which show the failure of such systems and then various Government ministers (in this case the Shools Minister) just claims them to be wrong, no back-up, no proof, no excuse. Just wrong. Inserting a small insult, which sounds like it's learnt from his days at school, about free school dinners just for good measure!
Gone are the days when facts had to be backed up with evidence eh? We are all commiting hate crimes in our hearts by just suggesting this...
Posted by Sara | 21.08.08, 12:29 GMT
So "The achievement gap between children from deprived backgrounds and the more affluent is closing." Really! - so now we are able to include Maths and English in the tables. Tables which only ever had any dubious validity as records of the basics. (reading, writing and arithmetic)
Managed Statistics can only measure a director of studies skill in placing the child where the school needs him or her to be in order boost the school's standing in the league tables. What about those children who were "guided" in to vocational studies who speaks for them?
No-one seems to know what the the purpose of education is apart from self-interest, let alone a childs education for the 21st century.
Posted by J Nutt | 21.08.08, 11:18 GMT
Education, like life, is ALWAYS selective. We should just accept this and get back to a grammar school system, as they have in mainland Europe, where the non-academic go to vocational schools. The communists also had selection, actually.
The comprehensive system was an American idea and was implemented for ideological and NOT educational reasons: it has now ruined social mobility in the UK. We MUST let the able shine and learn amongst others as bright as they are. We MUST accept selection - which happens anyway, as the comprehensive system is, in reality, selective - but not honestly so: the rich go private or move or select the best comprehensives for their kids. Comprehensives are just silly political nonsense.
We should accept human nature and implement ONLY those educational policies that are to do with education - not the leftwing PC educational ideology gargage or the piffle promoted by leftwing educationalists. Selection by school WORKS. End of. So bring it back.
Posted by Mumbo | 21.08.08, 10:10 GMT
A what? A "disparaging gap"? This is not a difficult word, Garner Minor, see me after school.
Posted by Mjwal | 21.08.08, 10:10 GMT
Labour has stealthily - or not in many cases - presided over old Tory policies full stop.
Now theat they have lost their core support and reason to be, the sheep will vote in Tories to continue the legacy of a one system politik. And the leader of that shambles cannot even look after his own bicycle let alone our country.
This will put us on track to be the new USA: outsourced governement to the private sector with profits to the few and regulations to none.
I vote looking after my own (local community), growing my own plants for food, seeds; educating my own; policing my own. I can only see a failed state for UK over the next decade.
PS why are we messing with Russia when we depend so heavily on their GAS?
Posted by sheepish | 21.08.08, 09:36 GMT
Robert, at 08.31 GMT below, is absolutely right.
The whole 'shambug' of equality is merely a ploy by politicians of all parties, all across the world, to please the plebs from the hustings. There is no such thing as equality - biology shows you that quite starkly.
Children with potential for for academic study should be mainstreamed in to grammar schools or whatever you may want to call them. Children with practical hands-on type of skills and competencies should be mainstreamed into technical institutes.
Parents of children who do not show any interest in their children's education, or or their whereabouts after 8pm, should be forced, by law, to assist in running delinquent children's camps. - But, of course, we know only too well that that will never happen in this politically correct world. Good old shabby democracy.
Posted by ILLUMINE | 21.08.08, 09:25 GMT
The simple truths remain that there are some children who are intelligent and others who are not; that some pupils are academic, whilst others are more practical.
No matter what you call the schools they attend, regardless of how you attempt to manipulate the system, nothing can alter these relaities.
New Labour has, for the past eleven years, presided over the lie that all pupils are capable of attaining academic excellence and of profitably attending university - and furthermore, that if any fail to do so, it must necessarily be the fault of the teacher. Claptrap.
Posted by Robert | 21.08.08, 08:31 GMT