Girls aged five beat boys for behaviour and the 'three Rs'
Friday 25 June 2004
Latest in Education News
On Facebook
From the blogs
CC kills more people than cervical cancer; why haven’t we heard about it?
There is a disease whose incidence is rising in the UK and most of the industrialised world. However...
We need to avoid another ‘lost generation’
A tiny green shoot one day, and then a chill wind the next. Anyone hoping for signs of economic spr...
More than half of Afghanistan’s families live in extreme poverty
Leila is watching her baby intently, as his mouth moves trying to swallow the small blob of yellow p...
Time for a new approach to alcohol
Ambulances were called and three drunk teenagers were brought to my care. One was so drunk we had to...
Girls are outperforming boys in everything from the 'three Rs' to how to dress and behave before they start lessons, the first national test results of five-year-olds show.
Girls are outperforming boys in everything from the 'three Rs' to how to dress and behave before they start lessons, the first national test results of five-year-olds show.
All four- and five-year-olds are assessed by their teachers on a range of subjects when they start primary school or in their reception class. Subjects covered include whether they can count to 10, recognise the alphabet, communicate with others, tie their shoelaces, recite nursery rhymes and dress themselves.
Yesterday's figures, published by the Department for Education and Skills, show that in all of the 13 areas of assessment, applied to about 550,000 pupils, the girls are streets ahead. The gap is most marked in "creative development" (imaginative play), in which 58 per cent of girls have reached or performed better than the targets set for them, compared with 42 per cent of boys.
Boys are also lagging behind in writing; 38 per cent of girls reach the target compared with 26 per cent of boys. The gap is smaller in reading: 43 to 35.
The results give the first statistical indication that girls develop understanding faster than boys before being introduced to the national curriculum. Girls' better performance in national curriculum tests had been put down to concentration in lessons.
The Department for Education and Skills stressed yesterday that the results should be treated with caution as some of the data was of poor quality and incomplete. It decided to publish the results after pressure from local education authorities.
However, ministers are taking comfort from results that show well over half of all five-year-olds scored well in personal, social and emotional development. In all, 58 per cent were performing better than expected in the attitude they adopted towards others and 55 per cent scored highly for emotional development.
Research has shown that many children lack social skills on arriving at primary school, being unable to communicate because, it has been claimed, their parents leave them alone all day in front of television screens. Yesterday's results show, however, that many can give their own names and recite nursery rhymes. Academics said that the expansion of services for the under-fives - providing free nursery provision for all three- and four-year-olds enrolled - could account for the performance.
However, teachers' leaders argued that the assessment system was so flawed - with 117 reports on every child - that the results should not have been published. David Hart, general secretary of the National Association of Head Teachers, said the assessment - known as the foundation stage profile - was "in dire need of a radical overhaul".
Phil Willis, Liberal Democrat education spokesman, said: "The biggest concern of five-year-olds should be playing and having fun. Now 36,000 of them are being told they haven't reached the mark in 'having knowledge and understanding of the world'. Ministers have become so obsessed with testing they have forgotten how valuable learning through play is for a child."
- 1 Ninety gaffes in ninety years
- 2 Cameron's 'drunk tanks' are dangerous, say police
- 3 Can you master a language in a weekend?
- 4 Rothschild loses libel case, and reveals secret world of money and politics
- 5 No secularism please, we're British
- 6 Apple admits it has a human rights problem
- 7 You couldn't make it up: Sun staff hope Strasbourg can save them from Murdoch
- 1 Ninety gaffes in ninety years
- 2 Spotify: 1 million plays, £108 return
- 3 Apple admits it has a human rights problem
- 4 Rothschild loses libel case, and reveals secret world of money and politics
- 5 Rangers future could be bright says administrator
- 6 MP faces charges over Nazi stag night
- 7 Six Grammys, five years off: Adele puts love before career
- 8 No secularism please, we're British
- 9 Mark Steel: If religion is 'marginal', I'm the Pope
- 10 Lightning kills an entire football team
Free trial of new Independent iPad app
Get your daily dose of the best of British journalism, sponsored by American Airlines
Win a three-week coastal jaunt
Spend three weeks exploring every nook and cranny of gorgeous Atlantic Canada.
Amazing restaurant offers
Three glasses of free champagne and a special menu at 46 top London restaurants.
Latest Independent competitions
Win anything from gadgets to five-star holidays on our competitions and offers page.
Commercial thought leaders
Watch the best in the business world give their insights into the world of business.
Career Services
Day In a Page
How an abortion divided America
Did they all live happily ever after? That's up to you...




Comments