Has cross-party wrangle hit tuition fees review?

News in pictures
News in pictures
On Facebook
From the blogs

More than half of Afghanistan’s families live in extreme poverty

Leila is watching her baby intently, as his mouth moves trying to swallow the small blob of yellow p...

Time for a new approach to alcohol

Ambulances were called and three drunk teenagers were brought to my care. One was so drunk we had to...

Bahrain: One year on

I am used to endless lies and criticism from the BNP and its favourite blogster, as well as Islamist...

Paul Volcker stands tall against the banking lobby

Why is Europe, which likes to present itself as an opponent of speculative "Anglo-Saxon" finance, li...

A big government announcement on the review of tuition fees has been postponed amid speculation that the Conservatives’ Higher Education spokesman David Willetts is at odds with the Business Secretary Lord Mandelson over the choice of chairman for the review and its terms of reference.



An announcement on both these issues was expected next week at the same time as publication of a “framework” report from government on the shape of higher education over the next 15 years. Now all a government spokesman will say is that the “framework” document will come out in the next few weeks and that details of the fees review will be published separately.

Willetts wants the review to take account of students’ experience at university, arguing that if students are going to be asked to pay higher fees – to the tune of £5000 or £7000 a year - they have the right to demand a high quality education. He is concerned about contact hours, class sizes and employability and believes that any inquiry into fees must look at whether students are satisfied with what they are getting.

If Mandelson and Willetts fail to reach agreement on the terms of the top-up fees review, this could have serious repercussions on British universities and mean that they are not able to lay their hands on the funds they need. That is because, although the review is being established before the general election, it will report afterwards. If the Tories win, and if there is no cross-party agreement, they will not be bound by the review’s recommendations.

It was Tony Blair’s government that promised the review back in 2001 when the new legislation sparked a backbench Labour revolt that almost brought down the government. The review was a concession that helped ministers assuage angry backbenchers who did not like the idea of students having to pay top-up fees. University vice chancellors have been waiting all year for that review to be announced.

There is a precedent for this. In 1997 there was cross-party agreement to the first review of higher education funding under the late Lord Dearing.

The former Tory Education Secretary Gillian Shepherd did a deal with her then Shadow David Blunkett and he was able to secure changes in the terms of reference. Dearing reported, recommending the introduction of a flat-rate tuition fee - and Labour acted on it.

Willetts refused to comment on his negotiations with Mandelson. “I have made it clear all along that we hope to be consulted and to go forward on a cross-party basis,” he said. “I don’t want to get into a commentary on the state our negotiations have reached.”

But he did say that he attached a lot of importance to students’ experience of university. “You couldn’t win the argument for higher fees unless you could show what was in it for students and their parents,” he said.

A number of names are being mooted for review chairman including Sir Michael Lyons, chairman of the BBC Trust, and Marjorie Scardino, chief executive of the media empire Pearson. Willetts would not say whom he favoured. “We’re being completely reasonable,” he said. I am not going around vetoing people willy nilly.”

Independent Comment
blog comments powered by Disqus
Career Services

Day In a Page

Picture preview: Portrait of London

Portrait of London

Picture preview
No secularism please, we're British

No secularism please, we're British

Arguments about the role of religion in national life have recently acquired a new urgency
Harold Tillman: 'Chinese tourists can save the high street – if we let them'

Harold Tillman interview

'Chinese tourists can save the high street – if we let them'
Working as a jail torturer ruined my life

Working as a jail torturer ruined my life

Meet the former soldier who has joined the political prisoners he tortured in Turkey's Mamak prison by suing the generals who led a regime of terror
The local high street jet shop

The local high street jet shop

Got a spare $50m and can't stand the queues at Heathrow? Get yourself down to London's first private plane dealership
Do you like your doctor? It could be the death of you

Do you like your doctor?

It could be the death of you...
The mysterious affair of how Agatha Christie is teaching foreigners English

How Agatha Christie is teaching foreigners English

Twenty of the author's novels have been adapted and presented with learning notes and a CD
Six Grammys, five years off: Adele puts love before career

Six Grammys, five years off

Adele puts love before career
The 10 Best binoculars

The 10 Best binoculars

From no-frills to bins with digital cameras
Milan for £300

Milan for £300?

A cultural family holiday - on a budget - to Italy's most stylish city
'Black-hole' resorts: Turn up, tune out, log off

'Black-hole' resorts

Turn up, tune out, log off
New Arsenal face an old question of credibility in San Siro

New Arsenal face an old question of credibility in San Siro

Remodelled since winning in Milan in 2008, for all their consistency – and prize-money – Wenger's side are yet to claim a European title
James Lawton: This prodigal son deserves no forgiveness

James Lawton: This prodigal son deserves no forgiveness

City would be putting their desire to win title ahead of morals if Tevez plays for them
Mark Cavendish: Is Olympic gold at end of the rainbow?

Mark Cavendish interview

Is Olympic gold at end of the rainbow?
Apple admits it has a human rights problem

Apple admits it has a human rights problem

After years of complaints and workers' suicides in China the technology giant faces up to the human cost of its gadgets