Education

6° London Hi 10°C / Lo 8°C

Independent boarding schools get £10,000 to take vulnerable children

By Richard Garner, Education Editor

Private boarding schools are being offered government grants of £10,000 to take in vulnerable children whose parents are on the verge of breaking up.

The decision to make direct payments to schools is an acknowledgement by the Government that earlier attempts to persuade local authorities to back the scheme have had a disappointing response.

The grants initiative is part of an attempt by ministers to promote closer collaboration between the state and private sector which will be the focus of a White Paper on education, 21st Century Schools, to be published next week.

The Schools minister, Sarah McCarthy-Fry, in her first speech on private schools since assuming responsibility for the sector two weeks ago, said 90 boarding schools – and 24 of England's 150 local authorities – had already pledged to offer places to children at risk of being taken into care.

Earlier attempts to promote the programme had identified 76 children who could benefit from the programme, only half of whom had been offered places. However, research had found evidence that it could help prevent family break-up by giving parents some respite and so avoiding children being taken into care.

Ms McCarthy-Fry said she hoped the Government's new drive, which would give grants directly to the boarding school, would help overcome "prejudice" against the scheme.

"We're encouraging more authorities to take part but there's a reluctance to take it on board," she said.

"Now we have some evidence as to how this is turning children's lives around. Intervention before the family breaks up and before they're taken into care prevents family break-up."

Speaking at the Independent Schools Council's conference in London yesterday, she also announced a £4m grant towards promoting closer collaboration between the sectors.

She cited one scheme in which teachers at the King's School in Ely, Cambridgeshire, a fee-paying school, had joined forces with those at three neighbouring state schools to plan their lessons together in an attempt to raise teaching quality and stretch their brightest pupils further.

"State schools should be able to benefit from the success of the independent sector," she said. "We can only ensure the best for all our pupils if we work in partnership across the sectors."

Independent schools are taking more than their fair share of the country's teachers, according to new research published today. They employ 14 per cent of the country's teachers despite educating fewer than 8 per cent of the nation's pupils, having used money from steadily increasing fees income to reduce class sizes.

The research, by a team at the London School of Economics, is published in the magazine of the Centre for Economic Performance today. It also reveals that the private sector finds it much easier to recruit teachers of shortage subjects in secondary schools, such as maths and languages.

Post a Comment

View all comments that have been posted about this article.

Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.

Comments

the best place for vulnerable children?
[info]jaffgyp wrote:
Thursday, 4 June 2009 at 09:15 am (UTC)
i'm not at all sure that an independent boarding school is the best place for a vulnerable child - not when i see the presumably less vulnerable products of such schools arrogantly congratulating themselves for their assumed superiority to anything which has emerged from one of the dreaded state schools - just where do you think far too many of those ethically deprived bankers and MP's got their educations?!!
Thank heavens for the independents
[info]alan_honiton wrote:
Thursday, 4 June 2009 at 09:22 am (UTC)
Sarah McCarthy-Fry presumably managed to deliver this speech with a straight face. So, national education policy doesn't work, local government won't work and the care system can't work. It's enough to make a socialist cry. No wonder confidence in the ability of 'government' to do good work is at an all time low.

Good luck (they deserve it) to children on this scheme, for they will benefit enormously. Not only do the independent sector employ 14% of teachers to educate 8% of the kids, those 14% just happen to be most of the best teachers in the UK - and they can teach 'proper' subjects too!
Re: Thank heavens for the independents
[info]jaffgyp wrote:
Thursday, 4 June 2009 at 04:28 pm (UTC)
who says they are the best teachers? ;and who paid to train them - assuming that they are all trained ?;as well as a range of 'state' schools, i worked in 4 different independent schools, 3 of them part boarding, and met few teachers there who would have lasted a day in a 'state' establishment- its easy to teach 'well' with small classes of pupils from aspirational middle class homes but i fear that nevertheless some of them would be very BAD for these 'vulnerable' children;
there are still a few 'state' boarding schools i believe, and if not, lets have some more, and make them comprehensives so that they can provide properly supervised and humane boarding in a natural social and sound educational environment- such schools might well provide a secure base for at least some insecure children;
but this cockeyed govt plan sounds to me too like a wheeze to help indep schools to fill up their rapidly emptying places ( with of course very carefully selected 'vulnerable' children) and to keep a balance of UK pupils amongst their hosts of offsprings of dodgy foreign politicians, celebrities etc, all at the UK taxpayers' expense ( is anyone else old enough to remember the 'assisted places' scheme which ended up largely providing free education at eton and harrow for the offspring of oxbridge dons!?);
as one of the generation of WW2 evacuees, i often feel that our experiences of leaving parents and home have never been rigorously investigated before we all pop off, but certainly general anecdotal information suggests that a large proportion of us did very well indeed away from home and parents- all that was needed was the attention of sensible loving adults who didn't make a great big fuss and carry on as if something abnormal and dreadful had happened to us ( no doubt we would be offered extended counselling these days...);
what a strange and nasty country we now live in where even childrens' upbringing and education is riven by class attitudes based on money ( and too often dirty money at that), and adult emotions are self-indulgently paraded in public quite regardless of the effects on children
Objections, valid and otherwise
[info]old_green wrote:
Sunday, 7 June 2009 at 08:58 am (UTC)
Placing children from broken homes into state boarding schools has got to be better than placing them into local authority care - the outcomes from state boarding schools are generally quite good, whereas the outcomes from vcare are almost invariably bad.

Local authorities have objected to using state boarding schools instead of care for several reasons, but whatever the validity, they have generally disregarded the poor outlook for children in LA Care.

Their reasons include: -
'what about the holidays?'
'we don't send kids out-of-borough'
'we don't have a procedure to do that'
'we don't have a budget'

The only one that holds any water is the first one, 'what about the holidays?'

There are several potential answers to that, depending upon the age of the child.

What is really needed is a set of recommendations to local authorities, about the practices and procedures they should put in place. This is normally done by issuing a government circular, of policy guidance.

I notice that nothing the government has said seems to be addressing these issues.

What they have mentioned is support for sending children to private boarding schools, rather than state boarding schools. Why? What is the need or justification to do this?

This does fit in with the government's policy of supporting independent schools in financial trouble. Is this the real priority here?

Most popular