Education

null 7° London Hi 7°C / Lo 0°C

It started with a classroom kiss...

Affairs between teachers and pupils can lead to a listing on the sex offenders register. Now a union wants to relax the laws. Richard Garner reports

Monday, 6 October 2008

Jess Anderson and her religious education teacher, Clive Richards, say their affair started after she left school

AFP/GETTY

Jess Anderson and her religious education teacher, Clive Richards, say their affair started after she left school

Dean Dainty was 16 when his teacher Nicola Prentice gave him a mobile phone, telling him it was a reward for doing well in class.

It had one number on it – hers – and her texts quickly turned intimate, and the relationship sexual. She arranged rendezvous between lessons, swearing Dean to secrecy, but after 18 months the strain became too much and he exposed what was going on. Prentice received a suspended prison sentence and was made to sign the sex offenders register; Dean said her actions "took a piece of my life away".

In another school in a different part of the country, a male teacher shared "just one kiss" with a 17-year-old female pupil at an end-of-term party. The teacher was arrested, charged with engaging in sexual activity with a child while in a position of trust and made to sign the sex offenders register, barring him from working with children for 10 years.

Yesterday a row broke out over whether the punishment meted out to teachers involved in relationships with pupils above the age of consent is over-the-top or appropriate.

Chris Keates, general secretary of the National Association of Schoolmasters Union of Women Teachers, called for ministers to think again about the law that makes it a criminal offence for a teacher to have sex with a pupil above the age of consent at his or her own school.

But her comments were criticised by child protection groups who say the law – the Sexual Offences Act – is there to protect children from adults who abuse their trust.

The teacher involved in the second case, who insists on remaining anonymous, said: "I'm a convicted sex offender for kissing a 17-year-old girl." The court that convicted him heard he had been engaging in texts and emails with the pupil before the party – one of which had led police to believe he had been involved with "grooming" the pupil for a relationship.

However, he insisted the conviction was "a total over-reaction and symptomatic of the child protection paranoia that now exists", saying that even the judge at his trial described the offence as "very minor". "I'm no Gary Glitter," the teacher said.

Ms Keates said yesterday that putting teachers who found themselves in such circumstances on to the sexual offenders register was an over-reaction. "That's the point where we do take some issue with the law," she said in an interview for the ITV1 Tonight programme, which is devoted to the topic this evening. "This isn't a person who is showing any tendencies for being a sexual offender: this is a person who's made a serious error of professional judgement. I don't think they need to be criminalised by being put on a sex offenders register."

She added: "There is a real anomaly in the law ... that is that if a teacher has a relationship with a pupil at the school at which they teach – it could be an 18-year-old pupil in the sixth-form – then that teacher can be prosecuted and can end up on the sex offenders register."

But Zoe Hilton, policy adviser to the National Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children, said: "The law is very clear that if a teacher abuses his or her position by forming a sexual relationship with a pupil they could be prosecuted and this remains the case even if the child gives their consent.

"The law is, quite rightly, there to protect children."

Plans for the law were unveiled by ministers in 1999 to allay fears in the House of Lords that a reduction in the age of consent for gay sex would leave some 16 to 18-year-old boys and girls vulnerable.

Ms Keates said: "Clearly there has to be appropriate disciplinary sanctions in the school to make sure inappropriate relationships don't develop but it does seem a step too far – when there has been a consensual relationship – to put that person on a sex offenders register when, in fact, they could have a perfectly legitimate relationship with an 18-year-old still enrolled at another school.

"I'd be very concerned if it was thought the NASUWT was saying that kind of relationship was OK. We don't think it is. It is gross professional misconduct."

Tonight's programme, entitled "To Sir With Love", also features the story of two other cases where teachers have had affairs with their pupils.

In a separate case, social services launched an investigation into the relationship between a 16-year-old pupil, Jess Anderson, with her thrice-married 50-year-old religious education teacher, Clive Richards, who are now living together at his family home in Penzance, Cornwall.

Jess, who has now left the school, insisted the affair did not start until he had left the school on long-term sick leave as a result of depression. However, when she first moved into his home in January, she was still a pupil at the school.

"Clive and I are in a long-term relationship, we are in love and we are very happy," said Jess who is planning to go to college in September. "We are just a normal couple who happen to have an age gap between us. I wish people would understand that."

Her parents have disowned her after saying she had to choose between them and her former teacher. Social services found there was no case to pursue as she was involved in a consensual relationship and was above the age of consent. The most famous case was that of Chris Woodhead, the former schools inspector, who was said to have had an affair with Amanda Johnston, whom he taught at Gordano school in Bristol when she was a 16-year-old pupil. He always denied the allegation, insisting that their relationship started after she had left the school. Friends of his former wife, including the actor Tony Robinson, said differently. Mr Woodhead went on to have a nine-year relationship with Ms Johnston.

The case received publicity after he was recorded on tape telling a group of trainee teachers that sex with a pupil could be "educative" for both partners.

Ms Keates is worried about the legislation – which has been in force for three years, during which there have been 129 prosecutions – from another standpoint: that it could prompt pupils to make malicious allegations against their teachers.

Figures show that around 6,000 teachers have been accused of abusing children in the past 15 years. The NASUWT said that of the 2,210 allegations it had investigated during this time only 88 had resulted in a conviction.

ITV's Tonight is broadcast at 8pm this evening

Interesting? Click here to explore further

Comments

116 Comments

Gregory let me clarify what the General Secretary of the union is asking for.

She wants consistency in the law which has already agreed long ago that in the UK 16 year olds have reached an age at which they can choose who to have sex with as long as their partners are also 16. That's all it is. Simple.

'Dirty old men and school girls' is only something on your mind. Not that of the union. The only school girls the union is discussing are those over the age of consent - and they can have sex with whoever they like - be they 20 year olds or 70 year olds. It's nothing to do with you. You're particular morals aren't relevant (thank god) where other like-minded adults are concerned.

Posted by james | 09.10.08, 09:35 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

Gregory seems to have a downer on ALL teachers! Certainly male ones, anyway. And what is this ugly phrase "doing schoolgirls" all about, Gregory? Tazia? You're both guilty of such gutter language. Do you think that raises your status in the esteem of others reading these comments? I can assure, it doesn't. While you purport to be on the side of child protection, your words belie that aim, since you seem to see schoolgirls as pieces of meat that can just be consumed or, in your terminology, "done". What I find such a shame is that while there are plenty of witch duckers to add their two penn'orth of paraffin to the blaze of national hysteria, only a few, like me, like James, like a few others seem strong enough to withstand the implicit criticism and try to bring some urgently needed balance.

And finally, ONCE again, Gregory, teachers ARE PERMITTED, BY LAW, to form a relationship with schoolgirls up the road, provided those girls are over the age of consent.

Posted by Mike Mitchell | 09.10.08, 09:32 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

Tazia said....."The NASUWT is the proper home for schoolgirl porn collectors"

Since girls can be in education at school until well into their 20s, I'd say this comment only just sneaks through as being acceptable. However, I'm pretty sure your intended meaning was actually incriminating and libellous so I'm reporting it as offensive.

I'm normally all for freedom of speech but I think you crossed the line there. Obviously the Independents moderation will have to decide if it's acceptable or not.

Posted by james | 09.10.08, 09:20 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

Gregory said..."You now have a teaching union asking for the right of dirty old men to do schoolgirls at the school up the road"

What a ridiculous sensationalist thing to say. And what an utter misrepresentation of the truth. I don't think you are educated enough to join in with discussions like this Gregory. In fact your diatribes are extremely dangerous.

Posted by james | 09.10.08, 09:13 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

"what on earth is the point in even having an age of consent if there is still an issue with consensual sex after this age?"

It is that Abu Graibh issue, one of those dudes I had encountered in the CRIPA thing with Arizona DOC ( female) prisons. In Humberside I found a few schools which were the same, was Haute de la Garenne that different to Abu Ghraibh? In Britain, child sex abuse is a entrenched culture, the NASUWT predicted that the FBI would be their enemy in 1997, by 2002 they were actively engaged in anti-FBI activities. If you cop out to Keates you are gong to have to decriminalize foster parents sleeping with their foster kids. And jail guards doing 'consensual' with girl prisoners. Get Margaret Hodge to be the Minister of that enterprise. In Britain you do large scale institutional child sexual abuse from the top to the bottom. You now have a teaching union asking for the right of dirty old men to do schoolgirls at the school up the road.

Posted by Gregory | 09.10.08, 00:36 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

Well said Sally!

Posted by james | 08.10.08, 19:17 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

I think that once a pupil has turned 16 and has left the compulsive years of education behind them, then it should not be a criminal offence for them to engage in a consensual relationship with a teacher. Fair enough, it may be unwise, but to risk the punishment of being put on the sex offenders register is, in my opinion absolutely mind boggling. what on earth is the point in even having an age of consent if there is still an issue with consensual sex after this age?

Speaking as someone who has experience with this issue, I am not suggesting that even people have to accept that sometimes teachers and their pupils do fall in love (although it would be nice for us to see people as just that - people) I simply think that being put on a sex offenders register for a relationship with a consenting over 16 makes a mockery of the law in the first place.

Posted by sally | 08.10.08, 19:01 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

Kayley, you hit the nail on the head when you said "We're all too busy judging".

We're well known for that in the UK. Like the Americans, we stomp around the globe proclaiming and moralising.

Consider this...

The U.K has one of the higher ages of consent in Europe. We also have the highest rates of unmarried teenage pregnancy rates in Europe, and also has one of the highest rates of terminated/aborted pregnacies.

On the other hand Spain has one of the lowest ages of consent (13), but also has the 2nd lowest teenage pregnancy rate and abortion rate in Europe.

So much for our obsessive moralising.

Posted by james | 08.10.08, 13:26 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

(For example) At 16 Jess Anderson can have a sex and a baby yet people seem to think she's not capable of having a loving and secure relationship?

We're all too busy judging this girl and not seeing that she is happy.

Posted by Kayley | 08.10.08, 12:53 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

Serena said...."getting involved with their pupils will always be a sackable offence. You may not understand why, but believe me, many, many people do"

Serena listen to people a little more. We all understand and agree that teachers having sexual relationships with students is and should be a disciplinary offence. No one has said anything to the contrary.

The nub of this discussion and that of the union General Secretary is that that's as far as it should go; it shouldn't also be a separate criminal offence if both parties are over the age of consent. It's a simple argument which you seem to be blurring all the time.

Posted by james | 08.10.08, 06:15 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

116 Comments