Oxford 'needs £1bn injection to be considered world class'
'Genuinely worrying times' ahead as university goes in to red for fourth straight year
Digg
del.icio.us
Facebook
Reddit
Google
Stumble Upon
Fark
Newsvine
YahooBuzz
Bebo
Twitter
Independent Minds
enlarge
Oxford University is plunging into the red for the fourth year running and needs £1bn to bring its facilities up to "world-class" standards, its outgoing vice-chancellor said.
John Hood, who has been at the helm for five years, said in his farewell speech: "From a financial perspective these are genuinely worrying times." He was speaking as the Government prepared to launch its long-awaited inquiry into student fees – which is expected to announce its conclusions after the general election.
Dr Hood said the university expected to suffer a funding loss of about £8m this year. "The investment required to bring Oxford University's estate up to 'world-class' standards is quite comfortably in excess of £1bn."
The university was also spending £8,000 more per student than the £8,750 income it received from fees and grants. Government budgets were over-stressed and the level of endowments received by the university was "extremely volatile". As a result, the approaching inquiry into top-up fees assumed a "critical importance".
Dr Hood said that any increase in fees would have to be matched by safeguards to ensure that students from more disadvantaged backgrounds were able to attend the university.
His warning about the university's financial plight was echoed by the incoming vice-chancellor, Andrew Hamilton, a former provost of Yale University in the US, who said: "The years ahead will not be easy for Oxford. They will require an intense debate on the role of the university, its financial income and its relationship with the rest of the national and international world."
He also said that the university had to take a stand against "political opportunism and social engineering".
The fees review – promised when top-up fees of up to £3,000 a year were first introduced in 2006 – will face pressure to lift the cap. Vice-chancellors have indicated that it would be possible to raise the cap to £5,000 a year without affecting student demand for places. Both Labour and the Conservatives are likely to back an increase in the fee level.
View all comments that have been posted about this article.
Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.
- Print Article
- Email Article
-
Click here for copyright permissions
Copyright 2009 Independent News and Media Limited
Comments
He's only got funds available for yankee-doodle wars. Everything else is cut, but mysteriously when the phone rings from the Pentagon, Gordon's only grovelling grunt is "Och aye, yes of course, hoo much will ye be wantin'? Oh aye, y'can have the lot, as much as ye want!"
Welcome to the 51st State. America first. Britain second. And all you British taxpayers can look forward to the warm glow of propping up whatever idiocy Uncle Sam dreams up. Because Britain's LOST ITS SPINE.
Sorry, apart from your usual anti-American rant.
And what Yankee boots would I be licking by pointing out that the only thing you ever contribute to a thread is an anti-American rant.
Those Yankee wars cost us about £4-5 billion a year, and as we are £800 billion in debt I'll concertrate on worrying about the economy, education, public services, immigration etc etc.
You keep thinking about big bad America thats responsible for all the Worlds woes if you want.....
Someone else with nothing to say about the funding of Higher Education under New Warmongering Labour.
I see you've managed to master Wikipedia, though - as a substitute for knowledge it gives the impression, right? Bwaaahahaha.