Schools warned of costly legal cases over ban on veil
Wednesday 21 March 2007
Latest in Education News
On Facebook
From the blogs
CC kills more people than cervical cancer; why haven’t we heard about it?
There is a disease whose incidence is rising in the UK and most of the industrialised world. However...
We need to avoid another ‘lost generation’
A tiny green shoot one day, and then a chill wind the next. Anyone hoping for signs of economic spr...
More than half of Afghanistan’s families live in extreme poverty
Leila is watching her baby intently, as his mouth moves trying to swallow the small blob of yellow p...
Time for a new approach to alcohol
Ambulances were called and three drunk teenagers were brought to my care. One was so drunk we had to...
Schools could become embroiled in expensive legal battles as a result of new guidelines allowing headteachers to ban the full Muslim veil.
The government guidance on school uniforms tells heads they can ban the niqab on grounds of safety, security and discipline.
The final decision will be left to individual schools, but the document says: "If a pupil's face is obscured for any reason, the teacher may not be able to judge their engagement with learning and to secure their participation in discussions and practical activities."
On other forms of religious dress such as the jilbab - a full-length garment including headscarf - the document is silent, saying simply that schools must consult over proposals and consider their obligation not to discriminate against pupils on grounds of race, religion or sex.
The guidelines, backed by Alan Johnson, the Education Secretary, have been described as "simply shocking" by the Islamic Human Rights Foundation. Legal experts warned they may flounder as a result of new legislation - set to come into force next month as part of the 2006 Equality Act - which makes it unlawful for an educational authority to discriminate against pupils on religious grounds.
"This could lead to schools spending thousands of pounds defending their actions in court," said Phillip Wood, a partner at Dawsons Solicitors.
- 1 Ninety gaffes in ninety years
- 2 Cameron's 'drunk tanks' are dangerous, say police
- 3 Can you master a language in a weekend?
- 4 Rothschild loses libel case, and reveals secret world of money and politics
- 5 No secularism please, we're British
- 6 Apple admits it has a human rights problem
- 7 You couldn't make it up: Sun staff hope Strasbourg can save them from Murdoch
- 1 Ninety gaffes in ninety years
- 2 Spotify: 1 million plays, £108 return
- 3 Apple admits it has a human rights problem
- 4 Rothschild loses libel case, and reveals secret world of money and politics
- 5 Rangers future could be bright says administrator
- 6 MP faces charges over Nazi stag night
- 7 Six Grammys, five years off: Adele puts love before career
- 8 No secularism please, we're British
- 9 Mark Steel: If religion is 'marginal', I'm the Pope
- 10 Lightning kills an entire football team
Free trial of new Independent iPad app
Get your daily dose of the best of British journalism, sponsored by American Airlines
Win a three-week coastal jaunt
Spend three weeks exploring every nook and cranny of gorgeous Atlantic Canada.
Amazing restaurant offers
Three glasses of free champagne and a special menu at 46 top London restaurants.
Latest Independent competitions
Win anything from gadgets to five-star holidays on our competitions and offers page.
Commercial thought leaders
Watch the best in the business world give their insights into the world of business.
Career Services
Day In a Page
How an abortion divided America
Did they all live happily ever after? That's up to you...




Comments