Inquiry to seek truth of nerve gas claim
Tuesday 23 June 1998
The allegations about Operation Tailwind, which was the subject of a high-profile CNN television documentary and an accompanying Time magazine article, have been increasingly challenged in the two weeks since they were aired.
They have also sown serious discord between the two arms of the Time- Warner empire.
In the programme, former servicemen testified on camera that they had seen mysterious gas canisters loaded on to a plane, the effect of which was to destroy the nerve functions of soldiers on the ground, and that special White House authorisation had been required for the operation.
The episode was said to have taken place in Laos in 1970 during the presidency of Richard Nixon.
Doubts about the claims surfaced immediately after the CNN documentary was broadcast.
Retired Admiral Thomas Moorer, chairman of the joint chiefs of staff at the time, insisted he had been misquoted and demanded a retraction. Senior journalists at Time also questioned the veracity of the allegations, loudly enough for the magazine to add a question-mark to the headline of its companion article.
Much rested on the success of the project, however, which was a heavily promoted collaboration between CNN and Time magazine.
CNN programme-makers defended themselves vigorously. Reporters were said to have conducted more than 200 interviews for the project and to have carried out rigorous checks.
The Pentagon responded within hours of the broadcast, saying it had no knowledge of such an operation. Within 24 hours, however, it had instituted an inquiry, which is due to report in two weeks' time.
Successive military spokesmen suggested that if gas was used, it was most likely tear gas.
A rash of fierce press articles followed in which former officials and servicemen questioning the soundness of the allegations and the credibility of the chief accuser, Robert van Buskirk.
As the doubts multiplied, CNN broadcast a clarification of Admiral Moorer's words, but no retraction. It also adjusted its version to say the gas had been used as a last resort to rescue US troops from an ambush, dropping the most eye-catching, but shocking charge that the attack was targeted at US defectors.
Meanwhile, the mood at Time was mutinous, with journalists still questioning the report - and, by implication, the standards of their television colleagues and the wisdom of the Time/CNN collaboration.
- 1 What happens to your body when you give up sugar?
- 2 Tourist films plane's descent just metres above packed Caribbean beach
- 3 World Book Day: Boy 'excluded' from school after dressing up as Fifty Shades' Christian Grey
- 4 Have sex with your iPad thanks to the new sex toy no-one asked for
Harrison Ford plane crash: Actor will make full recovery thanks to 'beautifully executed' landing
Tourist films plane's descent just metres above packed Caribbean beach
Oxford whistleblower's attempt to protect young victim of a sadistic gang went unheeded
How Homer Simpson discovered the Higgs boson over a decade before scientists
The 'sex selfie stick' lets you FaceTime the inside of a vagina
Durham Free School: 'Creationism taught at' free school facing closure
Nearly 100,000 of Britain's poorest children go hungry after parents' benefits are cut
End of the licence fee: BBC to back radical overhaul of how it is funded
Elif Shafak: Turkish author warns against rise of British nationalism
Ex-head of MI6: 'We shouldn't kid ourselves that Russia is on a path to democracy'
Most people think legal tax avoidance is just as wrong as illegal tax evasion, poll suggests
£14000 - £15000 per annum: Recruitment Genius: An opportunity has arisen for a...
£70000 - £80000 per annum: Ashdown Group: A long-established, technology rich ...
£25000 - £40000 per annum: Recruitment Genius: This growing digital marketing ...
£28000 per annum: Recruitment Genius: The Midland's leading Solar Panels provi...