After 87 years of cuts behind closed doors, the censor finally asks film-goers what they think

Britain's film censors are to launch an unprecedented public consultation to find out how much sex, violence and swearing the nation thinks should be allowed in films released in the United Kingdom. New guidelines, setting out clearly for the first time exactly how the censors will classify cinema and video releases, is to be published as part of the consultation. The British Board of Film Classification is responsible for certifying films under categories like U, A, PG or 18.

Britain's film censors are to launch an unprecedented public consultation to find out how much sex, violence and swearing the nation thinks should be allowed in films released in the United Kingdom. New guidelines, setting out clearly for the first time exactly how the censors will classify cinema and video releases, is to be published as part of the consultation. The British Board of Film Classification is responsible for certifying films under categories like U, A, PG or 18.

The move is part of the biggest shake up of cinema and video censorship rules since the birth of the BBFC in 1912. The Board's recently appointed director Robin Duval and president Andreas Whittam Smith have advocated a new policy of openness and decisiveness for the always controversial organisation. Under the last director James Ferman (censor 1975-98) the BBFC had developed something of a reputation for secrecy and procrastination.

Director Robin Duval has already said the highest priority for the BBFC is "to come out". "The public is entitled to know what we are doing on their behalf... and there maybe criteria that the public is concerned about."

While Mr Duval said he believed that the Board had got classification system "about right" he said that there was "insufficient research" for him to hold this view in complete confidence. He expected the consultation exercise to greatly add to what was known about how the public regarded film censorship.

Film censorship in the United Kingdom has been dogged by controversy ever since the first classification was introduced before yhe First World War which simply offered the public a choice between "U" and "A." The list of films that have created a storm is vast and includes: Monty Python's Life of Brian (blasphemy), Last Tango in Paris (buggery), Exorcist (terrifying), Reservoir Dogs (gratuitous violence), and Crash (sex with car crash victims).

The BBFC is inevitably accused of corrupting the nation's morals if it releases controversial films and censorship if it doesn't. "Sometimes I think the best you can hope for is a parity of abuse," Mr Duval has said. Until now the processes at the BBFC have not always been clear and it was not always clear why a film was given a particular certificate or one film's scenes cut and another's allowed to remain.

The Board employs a team of censors at its Soho Square headquarters who sit and watch all films for general release. They have to decide what certificate to award each film. They have to make tricky decisions like whether male actors are revealing a "Sid soft" which is OK within the board's current guidelines or a "Harry hard", which requires instant removal. Sexually explicit films are often cut before going on general release. The board tend to be tougher on videos as these can more easily be seen by youngsters.

Last month outrage followed the BBFC's decision to grant a general release 18 certificate for the French film "Romance" starring hard-porn legend Rocco Siffredi. At the time MP Gerald Howarth, chairman of the Lords and Commons Family and Child Protection Group, said it was "small wonder that 12-year-old girls were becoming pregnant when obscene films were common currency." Yet equally there is growing support for a more relaxed approach to hard core porn film classification.

Under the shake-up BBFC will issue draft guidelines for all its certificates from U right up to the Restricted 18 category for soft-core pornography films. Mr Duval said the new guidelines will clarify exactly what is and what is not permitted in a film which has been passed with one of the Board's classifications. He said, "If there was, much to our surprise, strong evidence that we had got it wrong in some respect, either too relaxed or too restricted, then we would respond," confirmed Mr Duval.

Mr Duval said no change would be made if the BBFC considered the change would be harmful and would not consider any change in the rules relating to films which portrayed drug taking. "We have so much evidence that drugs have a harmful influence on adults that we would not respond to that call," said Mr Duval. He said the same kind of argument applied to any material that might harm children.

Mr Duval said that under the new guidelines in the Restricted 18 category, the constraint on masturbation had been redefined as the "the manipulation of the genitals at the point at which it becomes masturbation." The old guidelines simply referred to a prohibition on "a clear sight of masturbation."

Mr Duval was appointed as director in January after 13 years working at the Independent Television Commission where he was deputy head of programmes. Andreas Whittam Smith took over as chairman of the board last year. He was a founding editor of The Independent. They have already certified a batch of films that had been held up under the previous director.

The British film censors' position is made that much more difficult by the fact the BBFC has no legal status in film censorship or classification. The local authority is statutory censor and has the final say on what cinemas operating in its locality can and can not screen. In the vast majority of cases the authority is happy to defer to the BBFC. But three years ago, in a controversial move, Westminster City Council banned David Cronenberg's film Crash, which includes scenes of sex with car crash victims, before the BBFC had even had a chance to look at it.

The new guidelines will be sent to all those involved in the film industry, groups which represent the film-going public and organisations which have an interest in film and video censorship. He said he also hoped the new rules, to be finalised in the Spring, would be more "robust" and help people to have a better understanding of each of the classifications.

The consultation follows the BBFC's decision to seek judicial review of a recent decision by the Video Appeal Committee (VAC) overturn the Board's refusal to grant Restricted 18 certificates for seven sex videos. The VAC rejected the Board's argument that a Restricted 18 classification should be refused just because the material might be harmful to children if it "fell in to their hands." Mr Duval said the Board believed the VAC had wrongly interpreted the definition of harm. Nevertheless, Mr Duval conceded that if the courts found in favour of the VAC it the BBFC would have to consider amending this classification. The Board only grants classifications to between 30 and 40 R18 videos a year.

Mr Duval said that one of the reasons the Board had decided to revise its rules and consult the public was the threat of legal challenges in the UK courts when the Human Rights Act comes into force next year. Under the European Convention of Human Rights restrictions on freedom of speech, which include the BBFC's classification must be set out clearly.

The codes of classification from 'U' to 'X'

To ensure that film censorship was consistent throughout the country the film industry set up the British Board of Film Censors in 1912.

The following year the "U" and "A" gave the public the choice between watching a film suitable for a child or an adult. In 1932 the "H" certificate indicated a horror film but was only advisory.

1951 saw the birth of the first "X" certificate which restricted admission to those of 16 or over. At the time the BBFC insisted that the new category was not merely "for sordid films dealing with unpleasant subjects, but films which, while not being suitable for children, are good adult entertainment and films which might appeal to an intelligent public."

In 1970 the first attempt to introduce a broader classification of films was made. These were:

"U" Universal.

"A" Admits children of five years of age whether accompanied by an adult or not and may contain some material that some parents may prefer their children under 14 not to see.

"AA" Admits children over 14.

"X" Only 18-year-olds and over are allowed to watch these films.

In 1982 the Parental Guidance (PG) and Restricted 18 Classification, for sex films, were added while "AA" became "15" and "X" was changed to "18."

Moments of sex and violence that became classic controversies

Straw Dogs, 1971 Sam Peckinpah's portrayal of rape caused outrage. It is still banned from video release in the UK.

Last Tango in Paris, 1973 Released with cuts as the first mainstream film with male/female buggery.

Monty Python's Life of Brian, 1979

This comic take on the life of Jesus resulted in blasphemy complaints.

Reservoir Dogs, 1992

Tarantino's piece of gratuitous violence was released uncut with an 18 certificate but banned on video.

Natural Born Killers, 1994

Oliver Stone's unappetising film of two psychotics killing large numbers of fellow Americans. Release delayed by media furore.

peopleFrankie Boyle responds to referendum result in characteristically offensive style
Lewis Hamilton will start the Singapore Grand Prix from pole, with Nico Rosberg second and Daniel Ricciardo third
F1... for floodlit Singapore Grand Prix
Arts and Entertainment
'New Tricks' star Dennis Waterman is departing from the show after he completes filming on two more episodes
tvHe is only remaining member of original cast
Arts and Entertainment
tvHighs and lows of the cast's careers since 2004
Have you tried new the Independent Digital Edition apps?
ebooksAn unforgettable anthology of contemporary reportage
Fans hold up a scarf at West Ham vs Liverpool
footballAfter Arsenal's clear victory, focus turns to West Ham vs Liverpool
New Articles
i100... she's just started school
New Articles
Life and Style
Couples have been having sex less in 2014, according to a new survey
Arts and Entertainment
musicBiographer Hunter Davies has collected nearly a hundred original manuscripts
New Articles
i100... despite rising prices
Holly's review of Peterborough's Pizza Express quickly went viral on social media
Latest stories from i100
Have you tried new the Independent Digital Edition apps?
Independent Dating

By clicking 'Search' you
are agreeing to our
Terms of Use.

iJobs Job Widget
iJobs Media

Head of Marketing - London

£60000 - £85000 per annum: Ashdown Group: Interim Head of Marketing / Marketin...

IT Application Support Engineer - Immediate Start

£28000 per annum: Ashdown Group: IT Software Application Support Analyst - Imm...

Digital Project Manager

£25 - 30k: Guru Careers: A Digital Project Manager is needed to join an exciti...

Paid Search Analyst / PPC Analyst

£24 - 28k + Benefits: Guru Careers: We are seeking a Paid Search Analyst / PPC...

Day In a Page

Scottish referendum: The Yes vote was the love that dared speak its name, but it was not to be

Despite the result, this is the end of the status quo

Boyd Tonkin on the fall-out from the Scottish referendum
Manolo Blahnik: The high priest of heels talks flats, Englishness, and why he loves Mary Beard

Manolo Blahnik: Flats, Englishness, and Mary Beard

The shoe designer who has been dubbed 'the patron saint of the stiletto'
The Beatles biographer reveals exclusive original manuscripts of some of the best pop songs ever written

Scrambled eggs and LSD

Behind The Beatles' lyrics - thanks to Hunter Davis's original manuscript copies
'Normcore' fashion: Blending in is the new standing out in latest catwalk non-trend

'Normcore': Blending in is the new standing out

Just when fashion was in grave danger of running out of trends, it only went and invented the non-trend. Rebecca Gonsalves investigates
Dance’s new leading ladies fight back: How female vocalists are now writing their own hits

New leading ladies of dance fight back

How female vocalists are now writing their own hits
Mystery of the Ground Zero wedding photo

A shot in the dark

Mystery of the wedding photo from Ground Zero
His life, the universe and everything

His life, the universe and everything

New biography sheds light on comic genius of Douglas Adams
Save us from small screen superheroes

Save us from small screen superheroes

Shows like Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D are little more than marketing tools
Reach for the skies

Reach for the skies

From pools to football pitches, rooftop living is looking up
These are the 12 best hotel spas in the UK

12 best hotel spas in the UK

Some hotels go all out on facilities; others stand out for the sheer quality of treatments
These Iranian-controlled Shia militias used to specialise in killing American soldiers. Now they are fighting Isis, backed up by US airstrikes

Widespread fear of Isis is producing strange bedfellows

Iranian-controlled Shia militias that used to kill American soldiers are now fighting Isis, helped by US airstrikes
Topshop goes part Athena poster, part last spring Prada

Topshop goes part Athena poster, part last spring Prada

Shoppers don't come to Topshop for the unique
How to make a Lego masterpiece

How to make a Lego masterpiece

Toy breaks out of the nursery and heads for the gallery
Meet the ‘Endies’ – city dwellers who are too poor to have fun

Meet the ‘Endies’ – city dwellers who are too poor to have fun

Urbanites are cursed with an acronym pointing to Employed but No Disposable Income or Savings
Paisley’s decision to make peace with IRA enemies might remind the Arabs of Sadat

Ian Paisley’s decision to make peace with his IRA enemies

His Save Ulster from Sodomy campaign would surely have been supported by many a Sunni imam