Media

Rain (AM and PM) 7° London Hi 9°C / Lo 7°C

46 BBC bosses earn more than the Prime Minister

By Andy McSmith

£834,000 - total pay package for director general Mark Thompson, 2008-09

Getty Images

£834,000 - total pay package for director general Mark Thompson, 2008-09

The BBC published details of the pay of its 107 most senior managers today, revealing that 46 earn more than the Prime Minister.

The decision to go public about its top office salaries is a sign that the BBC is responding to demands that it be more open.

But visitors to its website may be disappointed to find that while they can learn a great deal about the pay and expenses claims of officials whose names mean little or nothing to the public, there is nothing about the pay packets of the on screen stars such as Jonathan Ross, Graham Norton, Jeremy Paxman, and the rest.

The highest paid of the 107 senior managers listed is the Director General, Mark Thompson, whose basic salary of £664,000 is three and a half times the £194,250 that Gordon Brown is paid. Mr Thompson's total pay packet last year was £834,000.

His expenses claims ranged from £647.50 for a two night stay at The Bellagio, the Las Vegas hotel featured in the George Clooney film Ocean’s Eleven, to 70p that he fed into a parking metre. Mr Thompson claimed for 48 parking metre charges in 58 days from 5 March to 1 May this year.

There was also some surprise today at the discovery that the controller of Radio 1, Andy Parfitt, claimed expenses after climbing Mount Kilimanjaro for Comic Relief. He was one of the party who reached the 19,300 foot peak in March, along with Chris Moyles, Fearne Cotton, Gary Barlow and Cheryl Cole. Mr Parfitt, who is on a basic salary of £211,000, claimed £541.83 for 'specialist clothing' and other 'essentials' for the trip, and £26.20 for taxis to pick up his equipment,

A spokesman said: “Andy provided technical support to enable Chris (Moyles) to broadcast from the mountain each day. The specialist clothing was essential kit for the climb, taking into account the conditions that Andy would be facing."

Caroline Thomson, the corporation's chief operating officer, described the publication of the top salaries as "a significant move.” She added: "Today's launch is a direct response to the public, who have indicated that they would like more information about how the BBC is run in a way which marks a step change in openness, simplicity and accountability. We are meeting the spirit as well as the letter of the law."

Ms Thomson's salary is £333,000, and her expenses show that she claimed more than £1,500 for tax rides in one month, and more than £4,000 in three months. A BBC spokesman said Ms Thomson needed to travel extensively as part of her role.

"In London it can be quicker to go by taxi and she can also take calls, which she would not be able to do if she travelled by Tube or bus," he added.

Shadow Culture Secretary Jeremy Hunt welcomed publication of the figures, but added: "They can't stop here. We must see a full breakdown of what the BBC pays their celebrity talent.”

The newly-released information can be found at www.bbc.co.uk/info/running/bbcstructure/index.shtml.

Post a Comment

View all comments that have been posted about this article.

Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.

Comments

Staggering
[info]johnnynorfolk wrote:
Thursday, 12 November 2009 at 03:21 pm (UTC)
The amounts paid are just staggering. It is obscene when you think of how the BBC is always running guilt stories about everything and is just creaming off the top. How about a pay freez and licence freeze to help the rest of us.
Bigger crooks...
[info]petefergie wrote:
Thursday, 12 November 2009 at 05:12 pm (UTC)
than MPs, notice how all meetings are never held in an office, oh no, it has to be over a meal/dinner.

All covered nicely by so-called "entertainment/hospitality"

Every which way we are milked!
Paid more than Parliament
[info]had_it wrote:
Thursday, 12 November 2009 at 05:23 pm (UTC)
Perhaps they do a better job?

PS: they make a lot less than the average footballer, though a lot more than the best school teacher in Britain.
Mark Bloody Thompson
[info]lucid1984 wrote:
Thursday, 12 November 2009 at 05:26 pm (UTC)
earns over half a million a year and won't pay for his own hotel rooms?

Someone obviously knows they have nothing to be professionally proud of. Those who do pay their own way with what they have earned from their accomplishments.
Re: Mark Bloody Thompson
[info]had_it wrote:
Thursday, 12 November 2009 at 07:11 pm (UTC)
I would not work for any company that sent me on a business trip and then asked me to pay for my hotel. Anyone who would is just plain silly.
No one at the BBC should be paid more than £75,000
[info]peter_holl wrote:
Thursday, 12 November 2009 at 05:30 pm (UTC)
For the amount of work done, and the responsibilities of the job, there is no reason why anyone at the BBC should earn over £75,000 p.a.

The pay of what are effectively public servants shouldn't be high: they have job security and will receive a great deal of satisfaction from their work in a creative environment... the need for high salaries is not a factor in working for a public broadcaster. The BBC has awarded its employees high salaries which reflect the disconnexion between these people and those who pay their salaries through a tax.

If the BBC were paid on a voluntary basis, it would loose a huge amount of its revenue, and it could (if everyone took a pay cut) carry on just as before with normal rather than these inflated pay rates for its staff. If employees were dissatisfied, they could leave and do what they want elsewhere. In house production would increase as the outsourced programmes are all outrageously expensive and the BBC wouldn't buy them at the prices now charged.

If the highly paid newscasters, interviewers and entertainers left no one would miss them: there are plenty more fish in the sea quite capable of doing their jobs for a fraction of what these people are paid.

It is obscene that people get the equivalent of the average annual wage for standing in front of a camera reading an autocue in less than a week, if not less than an hour.

It's time we either scrapped the licence fee or halved it with everyone getting the sack and having to re-apply for his/her job at a much much lower salary.

The high salaries of certain sectors of society have widened the divide between rich and poor: three times the average wage is plenty for anyone at the top of the BBC.
Re: No one at the BBC should be paid more than £75,000
[info]had_it wrote:
Thursday, 12 November 2009 at 07:10 pm (UTC)
That's a good prescription for killing the BBC off entirely. You might get some time-serving civil servants, but you will get no senior executives worth having for 75k in television - or in any other businesses of comparable size.
Re: No one at the BBC should be paid more than £75,000
[info]robred wrote:
Thursday, 12 November 2009 at 08:59 pm (UTC)
What other private business has a captive customer base that has to pay if they want to watch any other rival channels broadcast, on pain of criminal sanctions, backed up by another private company, with it's self employed sales/enforcers behaving like Luigi and the boys operating a protection racket, harassing even those who don't need a licence. They are beyond the pale, and the BBC needs severely pruning.
News to me..
[info]drsocial wrote:
Thursday, 12 November 2009 at 05:57 pm (UTC)
"In London it can be quicker to go by taxi and she can also take calls, which she would not be able to do if she travelled by Tube or bus," he added. - Since when were you unable to take phone calls on a bus..?
Re: News to me..
[info]had_it wrote:
Thursday, 12 November 2009 at 07:16 pm (UTC)
You are right! Since good manners and consideration for others died, people take phone calls on buses all the time.
Undermining the BBC
[info]bob_idle wrote:
Thursday, 12 November 2009 at 09:16 pm (UTC)
Like most people I support the BBC but am appalled at the extravagant amounts paid to some BBC employees and "stars".

The BBC is under increasing pressure from right-wing ideologues. They see it as a bastion of socialism because it's publicly funded from the compulsory licence fee. They also see the demise of the BBC as a desirable way for private companies to make much more money.

Huge battalions of very rich and powerful and frankly appalling people are lined up to destroy the BBC, pick the meat off the bones, and dance on it's grave. And we are in line for a Conservative government which is made up of and financed by these very people.

The BBC is therefore in the last chance saloon and needs all the friends it can get. Therefore the excessively-paid executives and celebrities should think carefully about what their greed is doing to our much-loved public service broadcasting co; not only in terms of draining it's finances but in terms of angering people who are naturally should be, and are, supporters of the BBC .

A Murdoch world?
[info]dvslon wrote:
Friday, 13 November 2009 at 12:09 am (UTC)
Without a strong BBC, we'd be left with a Murdoch Empire which would be too powerful for the weak competition. I just hope the David Cameron with his anti-BBC views (well, he's anti-everything if it gets him votes/airtime) realises this. It has been recommended to him that the licence fee is scrapped and the BBC is paid for by the government instead. Hope he takes the advice and leaves the BBC to remain independent.
[info]adrian556 wrote:
Friday, 13 November 2009 at 10:57 am (UTC)
You say offensive or abusive comments will be removed yet only the other day Mark Thompson was calling for more offensive and abusive behaviour on TV himself.

Mark Thompson is paying himself a ridiculous amount of money, is taking an endless series of morally dubious decisions, and is presiding over comedic drivel, all at taxpayers' expense. He should be sacked and we, the licence fee payers, should have the power to remove him.
Inexcusable
[info]pickles80 wrote:
Friday, 13 November 2009 at 10:57 am (UTC)
I am pro-BBC, but agree that this whistle-blowing on expenses is long overdue. Once executives get into comfortable positions of power they are too quick to become complacent, inefficient and wasteful.

These people are at the heart of public service broadcasting but are totally out of touch with reality. Shocking.
The Beeb have an identity crisis
[info]shegelu wrote:
Friday, 13 November 2009 at 11:29 am (UTC)
They need to decide what they are. For too long, the BBC have been taking the license fees for granted. They have to make up their minds. Are they are a publicly funded body or are they a private sector company? If the former, then they should be held accountable & such lavish salary & rewards should be monitored & subject to controls by an external party.
Independent Newspaper pay scales
[info]no1bob wrote:
Friday, 13 November 2009 at 12:21 pm (UTC)
In the interest of fairness would it not be proper for the Independent to produce a list of the pay and expenses paid to its senior executives?
SAD
[info]normandugmore wrote:
Friday, 13 November 2009 at 12:38 pm (UTC)
The system, and we can never change it we the poor and the working class pay our taxes and licience fees so MPs and Mark Thompson and co can live the life of luxury and regardless of all the publicity they all know there is nothing we can do about it, for instance what as happend to MPs who were claiming for Mortgages they never had, i was brought up to belive that was dishonest but its been swept under the carpet AGAIN
Norman form Newport
Re: SAD
[info]igarwood wrote:
Friday, 13 November 2009 at 04:55 pm (UTC)
1,500/month just for taxi rides. wow. Joe

Most popular