Media

Mostly Cloudy with Showers 9° London Hi 9°C / Lo 7°C

Humpty Dumpty had a great fall... but don't worry, he'll be fine

The BBC has softened the ending to the nursery rhyme

By Jane Merrick

Humpty Dumpty is given a new lease of life

WWW.BRIDGEMAN ART.COM

Humpty Dumpty is given a new lease of life

For generations, the cautionary tales of the grown-up world wrapped up in nursery rhymes have been a normal part of childhood. Children have somehow managed to cope with a world where mice are blind, blackbirds are baked in pies and old women live in shoes.

But the BBC has triggered amazement by changing the words of Humpty Dumpty on one of its children's programmes to give the accident-prone character a happy ending. A programme on the broadcaster's children's channel CBeebies featured a singalong feature in which, instead of being unable to "put Humpty together again", all the King's Horses "made Humpty happy again".

The new version of Humpty Dumpty was broadcast on Friday in the CBeebies programme Something Special, presented by Justin Fletcher. Something Special is aimed at children with special needs, although it is popular with all under-fives. The BBC insisted the nursery rhyme was not modified because of its target audience.

A BBC spokesman insisted yesterday that the original nursery rhyme had been changed for "creative" purposes. Humpty Dumpty featured in a number of "sketches", she added. The original nursery rhyme could be seen in full on the CBeebies website.

But the Labour MP and former minister Tom Harris, who watched the programme on Friday with his two sons, aged five and three, said it was "pathetic" that CBeebies felt the need to rewrite one of the most famous nursery rhymes in an apparent attempt not to upset children.

The MP for Glasgow South said yesterday: "For goodness sake. Obviously children will find it far too violent, distressing and horrific that Humpty should not be put together again."

Mr Harris claimed there was a trend of CBeebies giving its young viewers a more sanitised version of the world.

In a recent episode of the CBeebies cookery show Big Cook Little Cook, the tale of Little Miss Muffet ended with the girl befriending the spider, rather than running away in fright.

Mr Harris added: "This is what happens when adults try to make these kinds of judgements."

A BBC spokesman said yesterday: "We play nursery rhymes with their original lyrics all the time and the small change to Humpty Dumpty was done for no other reason than being creative and entertaining."

Earlier this month a survey by the reading charity Booktrust found that a fifth of parents do not read nursery rhymes at all to their children.

Happy ever afters: The IoS rewrites some childhood favourites

* Seesaw Margery Daw, Johnny shall have a new master. He shall earn the minimum wage, because the Labour government made it legally binding.

* Rock a bye baby on the tree top, when the wind blows, the cradle will rock. When the bough breaks, the cradle will be safe because the tree has undergone a health and safety assessment.

* Old Mother Hubbard went to the cupboard to get her poor doggie a bone. When she got there, the cupboard was full because she just had a delivery from Ocado.

* London Bridge is undergoing planned engineering works. Please wait for further announcements.

* Three visually impaired mice, three visually impaired mice. See how they run, see how they run. They all ran after the farmer's wife, who handed them over to the RSPCA.

* Little Bo Peep has lost her sheep – but she knows how to find them because she has satnav.

Post a Comment

View all comments that have been posted about this article.

Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.

Comments

[info]victoriavandal wrote:
Saturday, 17 October 2009 at 11:27 pm (UTC)
Hang on, why are you complaining? I thought the Indy was supposed to be a 'progressive' paper! Just because these rhymes are 'traditional' doesn't mean we should continue to inflict them on generations of children. 'Traditional' doesn't mean 'good'! Human sacrifice used to be 'traditional' on these islands, but we've cleaned the May Day rituals up. Same should go for the rhymes and the nursery stories, composed in an era when death was common and most children were expected to die in infancy, or see their siblings and parents die around them. The rhymes and stories reflected that cruelty and brutality, but that's not the era we're living in now. I'm surprised a Labour MP thinks these rhymes prepare children for the 'real world' - I hoped that in Britain at least, whipping children, cutting off animals' tails, extreme pensioner poverty and inoperable head injuries were a thing of the past...
[info]dogsolitude_v2 wrote:
Sunday, 18 October 2009 at 08:39 am (UTC)
A lot of these nursery rhymes contained cautionary tales to warn kids of potential danger.

Sitting on a wall, falling off and hurting yourself isn't generally considered a good idea. Niether is running off into the woods on your own, or pestering girls a la Georgie Porgie.

Hardly on a par with 'whipping children, cutting off animals' tails, extreme pensioner poverty and inoperable head injuries were a thing of the past' (one of the most extreme misrepresentations of someone else's position I've seen in a long while! :)

Additionally, they also represent a part of English culture, along with the tales of Robin Hood, Dick Turpin and King Arthur, Dandelion and Burdock, Beowulf, Winnie the Pooh, Dickens, Purcell etc. Chopping them up and making them 'nice' because we're afraid of giving kids nightmares is not really cricket: if you'd rather give kids a sterile, sanitised upbringing where nobody ever gets hurt in stories then just make new stories and songs. I always used to like 'The Wheels on the Bus' when I was little.
[info]victoriavandal wrote:
Sunday, 18 October 2009 at 09:31 am (UTC)
Should we, then, reinstate some of the other classic nursery rhymes that have been quietly dropped? "Taffy was a Welsman, Taffy was a thief...Taffy was a Welshman, Taffy was a sham...", or "Goosey Goosey Gander", with its line about throwing an old man down stairs for refusing to pray, which seems to combine Richard Widmark with the Taliban? Yes, I know the (supposed) historical sources of the rhymes, but three year olds do not, and explaining to a three year old that it doesn't mean killing an old man like grandad, or atheists in general, it meant a Catholic priest in the 16th/17thc (of which a three year old has no concept) and that's ok because..er...no it isn't, is it?

We've also dropped the nasty bits of the Bible (nearly all the Old Testament and a big chunk of the New), and some of the nastier hymns ("the rich man in his castle/the poor man at his gate/God made them high or lowly/and ordered their estate/all things bright and beautiful..." "by the light of burning martyrs, Christ thy bleeding feet we track..."). Teach these things to 9 year olds in a history class by all means, but dont croon them to babes in arms.
[info]victoriavandal wrote:
Sunday, 18 October 2009 at 09:49 am (UTC)
Btw, which Dick Turpin? The historical rapist, murderer, torturer and thief, or the dashing chap of the 19thc novel 'Rookwood', with Black Bess etc.? I suspect you are thinking of the latter - well, that's the sanitised, bowdlerised version...
[info]dogsolitude_v2 wrote:
Sunday, 18 October 2009 at 09:57 am (UTC)
Well, actually I was thinking of the latter. Again, as story, myth and folklore which has become part of our culture.

Changing the subject, I'm curious here: is there any aspect of being English that you actually like?

See seem very quick to put the boot in.
[info]victoriavandal wrote:
Sunday, 18 October 2009 at 10:39 am (UTC)
I'm British, not English. I read Beowulf in Anglo-Saxon (I prefer the Seafarer). Culture isn't a fixed thing - it changes. Attitudes shift. Heroes become villains and vice versa. The writer of the poem that is now best known as 'Jerusalem' and sung lustily in public schools, at rugby matches and by the Wi was once arrested for Sedition.
[info]dogsolitude_v2 wrote:
Sunday, 18 October 2009 at 11:52 am (UTC)
Fair comment.

I'd add though that I'd always seen 'English' as a subset of 'British' (and 'British' as a subset of 'European' and so on...). I tend to respond 'English' when asked my nationality, and am happy to tick the 'British' box on a form.

My view is that we've got a pretty rich and varied culture that often gets degraded or treated with a sort of contempt (probably due to over-familiarity rather than any conspiracy to wipe it out). I often feel we take it for granted and generally ignore it in favour of other stuff, or worse still take a perverse delight in rubbishing it to show how modern we are.

On reflection I suppose some of the content of nursery rhymes does seem rather alarming, but I do also worry that by giving children a 'happy drip-feed' we may be doing them a bit of a disservice. By the same token though I wouldn't want to drown them in grittily-realistic drama either. I feel a balance must be struck, and this time the BBC went a bit too far in the 'soft'n'cuddly' direction.

Don't get me wrong, I'm not going to lose any sleep over this; it was just one kids programme after all, and there's no evidence of a determined cultural whitewash coming along to sanitise everything that I've seen.

Apologies for the typos btw. Batteries running low on keyboard!
[info]dogsolitude_v2 wrote:
Sunday, 18 October 2009 at 09:55 am (UTC)
I think you're getting things rather out of proprtion here... We're talking about Humpty Dumpty of all things! Kids do know when something's 'just a story'.

I suppose you'de be in favour of banning the works of Roald Dahl as well?
ridiculous
[info]uomotokus wrote:
Sunday, 18 October 2009 at 06:47 am (UTC)
Humpty Dumpty was a Cannon - a great big lump of cast iron not some egg nor even a person. Just shows how ignorant the children's programme makers really are.
Re: ridiculous
[info]beadyem wrote:
Friday, 23 October 2009 at 12:35 pm (UTC)
From Wikipedia:

The theory that Humpty Dumpty was a cannon used in the siege of Colchester in 1648 during the English Civil War is often stated as fact.[3] However, the additional 'discovered' verse which reveals this meaning was actually written as a spoof for the Oxford Magazine in 1956 by Professor David Daube.[4] The story was originally attributed to Gloucester and has no substance in fact, despite its adoption by the tourist industry of Colchester. The additional verse is:
[info]dogsolitude_v2 wrote:
Sunday, 18 October 2009 at 08:54 am (UTC)
The MP for Glasgow South said yesterday: "For goodness sake. Obviously children will find it far too violent, distressing and horrific that Humpty should not be put together again."

Never bothered me when I was little. I just didn't sit on high walls, because I knew that if I did I could get hurt.

It's sad: these rhymes are a part of our shared culture. Nobody would dare insist on other cultures changing their songs or rhymes so why Bowdlerise ours?
Best nursery rhyme ever
[info]milesbatch wrote:
Sunday, 18 October 2009 at 09:28 am (UTC)
Grand Old Duke of York! Always gets the kids going. Even now, at the age of 44, whenever I hear it it makes me want to goose-step around the living room!
bbc nursery rymes
[info]paulmaxsi wrote:
Sunday, 18 October 2009 at 05:29 pm (UTC)
did thousands of british military personnel die in two world wars so britian could end up like this. everything is offensive or politically incorrect or both. old people are mistreated, hospital patients need to fear for their lives, yobs rule, and the innocent live in fear. is this what all those brave souls died for?


p. bloomberg
old man
glendale, ca
[info]mmaddox wrote:
Sunday, 18 October 2009 at 07:07 pm (UTC)
This is the end of the world.
[info]nsss1 wrote:
Sunday, 18 October 2009 at 10:23 pm (UTC)
Those of you who have commented negatively have never actually seen the programme have you?

Shame on you - leave Mr Tumble alone.
[info]hani_morris wrote:
Sunday, 1 November 2009 at 04:11 pm (UTC)
Absolutely ridiculous. Why change it now? They are historical rhymes that portray fables that give warnings so that children can deal with real life situations. If children are protected from realities like falling down or being frightened by spiders, how will they ever learn to deal with these situations when they are on their own? Children need exposure to the idea of some bad things happening as they will have to face them alone and need to be equip to deal with it.

Most popular