Media

Rain (AM and PM) 4° London Hi 10°C / Lo 3°C

Jonathan Ross cleared over 'homophobic' comment

Press Association

A BBC study will attempt to draw a line under the scandal caused last October by the foul-mouthed behaviour of Jonathon Ross (above) and Russel Brand

GETTY IMAGES

Ross did not break broadcasting rules

Jonathan Ross did not breach broadcasting rules when he suggested that parents should put their sons up for adoption if they wanted a Hannah Montana MP3 player, industry watchdog Ofcom found today.

The comments, made on his Radio 2 show, provoked 61 complaints from listeners who said Ross was being homophobic.

During the broadcast, on 9 May, he discussed prizes in a competition themed around the fictional teenage pop star.

He said: "If your son asks for a Hannah Montana MP3 player, you might want to already think about putting him down for adoption before he brings his... erm... partner home."

But Ofcom found that the comment was "clearly presented as a joke" and part of Ross's "irreverent, challenging and at times risque humour".

The presenter found himself in hot water last year after he and fellow DJ Russell Brand left obscene messages on actor Andrew Sachs's answerphone, which were also broadcast on Radio 2.

Ross was suspended for 12 weeks by BBC bosses, but walked straight back into controversy on his radio show by joking about having sex with an elderly woman.

His radio show, which has been on air since 1999, features light-hearted exchanges between Ross and the programme's producer Andy Davies.

Ofcom said: "The comment was clearly presented as a joke intended to make light of the reactions that some parents may have if their child chooses a toy that is very widely recognised to be designed and marketed for the opposite sex.

"The humour was therefore based on the absurdity of the scenario and was not intended to cause offence.

"The fact that this comment was intended to be a joke was illustrated further by the reaction from Andy Davies, who was heard laughing.

"Ofcom therefore considered that the nature of the joke and the tone and manner in which it was presented made clear that it was not intended to be hostile or pejorative towards the gay community in general."

The watchdog found that any children listening would have been unlikely to understand the implication being made.

It said: "Ofcom took into account that Jonathan Ross is a well known personality, who has an irreverent, challenging and at times risque humour that is familiar to audiences. Ofcom also recognised that the comment was clearly aimed at an adult audience. Importantly, if children did hear this comment it was unlikely that they would have understood it or its implications.

"In light of this, Ofcom considered that there was little potential for the comment to be imitated by children, for example in the playground."

Ross did not break broadcast rules which say material that causes offence must be justified by the context.

His comments provoked anger from a number of listeners.

After the broadcast, Karen Mills told Pink News: "How can these people earn such huge sums of public money to come out with this discriminatory rubbish?

"What would be the message to a young gay man listening to this? Worse still, how might such comments reinforce and support homophobic bullying in the playground?"

Known for his irreverent humour and flamboyant fashion sense, Ross also presents a chat show, Friday Night with Jonathan Ross on BBC1, featuring musical group 4 Poofs and a Piano.

Post a Comment

View all comments that have been posted about this article.

Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.

Comments

Jonathan Ross did not breach broadcasting rules
[info]saysitall wrote:
Monday, 6 July 2009 at 01:27 pm (UTC)
He and Ofcom are contemptible (and Paraphrase)
[info]melsykes wrote:
Monday, 6 July 2009 at 01:34 pm (UTC)
"Flamboyant displays of homosexuality in public will be met with disgust because it's against social norms" is the message.
[info]dnmurphy wrote:
Monday, 6 July 2009 at 01:41 pm (UTC)
It just show's how uncool and unhip he is, with his target audience really being the 20% of the low-forehead, knuckle-dragging part of the population.
uhg...
[info]bestinshow wrote:
Monday, 6 July 2009 at 01:45 pm (UTC)
People need to get a grip.
Ofcomland. "There's no such thing as homophobia"
[info]rufusred wrote:
Monday, 6 July 2009 at 02:04 pm (UTC)
I would like to see what, exactly, one would have to say on air for Ofcom to find that yes, a homophobic comment had been made, short of calling for the summary execution of gay people and even then this toothless watchdog would probably say that no offence was meant - as will the many rabid gay-bashers who will spew their contempt for gay people into this comment page. (they've already started, I see.) Is it even possible to be homophobic according to this heterosexist, gay-baiting, bigotry-complicit tax-payer-bank-rolled monitoring body? Ross's comment was homophobic, whether you like the guy or appreciate his debateable talent is neither here nor there. His piggish, bigotted 'joke' wasn't bad by BBC standards, actually; Ofcom has upheld the Corporation in virtually all cases such as this.
Some of my gay friends thought it was funny?
[info]oftaa wrote:
Monday, 6 July 2009 at 02:28 pm (UTC)
That's it really. Wind ups are part of the British sense of humour.
Pathetic whingers
[info]timonsays wrote:
Monday, 6 July 2009 at 02:42 pm (UTC)
More hysterical whinging from the homosexual lobby. Even if these comments were offensive - and it has been ruled that they were not - why can't people accept the principle of freedom of speech?

There is NO right not to be offended. Everyone has a perfect right to be as offensive as they want. If you can't be offensive then you do not have freedom of speech. The BBC are far too pathetic already, always terrified that something mght be said that someone might object to.

I would like to see genuine freedom of speech. Obviously those who complained are fascists who want to control what other people say.
This is a Ross Witch Hunt
[info]krisaccount wrote:
Monday, 6 July 2009 at 06:37 pm (UTC)
It just show's how uncool and unhip he is, with his target audience really being the 20% of the low-forehead, knuckle-dragging part of the population.
---------------------------------------------
Actually Ross's target audience is the exact opposite of what you think. In reality the people who find Ross most funny tend to be a younger more highly educated part of the population. The show's called Friday night with Johnathon Ross because its on a friday the exact time you believe your so-called 'low-forehead knuckle-dragging' part of the population to be out causing trouble.
With regard to this comment we all know deep down that if anyone else had of said it there wouldn't have been a single complaint and even if there had, it wouldn't have made the news. In addition we all know that most of the people who complained about the Sachs scandal never even heard the program, which was simply a case of a joke going a little too far. Comedy is there to push boundaries, to outrage and entertain at the same time. You name me one successful comedy that hasn't offended someone? Little Britain made more fun of stereotypes than perhaps any other comedy. Faulty Towers certainly would have offended a fair few Germans and you'll see more offensive comments in 5 minutes of Family Guy than Ross will make in his whole career. If you going to moan about this you might as well remove laughter from human life. Good to know that some of society has stopped looking through their MPs expenses to moan about something else though.
Re: This is a Ross Witch Hunt
[info]mickey_modster wrote:
Tuesday, 7 July 2009 at 10:46 am (UTC)
I agree. I just happened to catch a part of the Chris Evans show last night, which was entitled 'Mincing Monday'. Is this anymore or any less homophobic than what JR said? Or, is it certain people just being selective? It is time to end this Rossophobia

Most popular