Media

Rain (AM and PM) 3° London Hi 10°C / Lo 3°C

Thatcher was sacked for refusing to apologise for 'racist' remark, BBC says

By Jerome Taylor

Carol Thatcher's agent has claimed that a member of the BBC had leaked the story because the corporation had a vendetta against the family name

PA

Carol Thatcher's agent has claimed that a member of the BBC had leaked the story because the corporation had a vendetta against the family name

The BBC launched a scathing attack on Carol Thatcher yesterday, defending its decision to drop the former prime minister's daughter and accusing her of refusing repeated opportunities to apologise publicly for using the word "golliwog".

The 55-year-old commentator was sacked from her "roving reporter" role on The One Show after she used the pejorative term to describe a black tennis player in the show's green room. Ms Thatcher's agent, Ali Gunn, claimed that BBC bosses dropped her client purely because she is the daughter of Margaret Thatcher. Others have accused the corporation of over-reacting.

But yesterday the controller of BBC1, Jay Hunt, dismissed the protests and defended the corporation's decision to fire Ms Thatcher. "What she decides to say at home in private is one thing, but we have given Carol ample opportunity to give a fulsome apology and she has chosen not to do so," Ms Hunt told BBC Radio 4's Today programme.

She said Ms Thatcher made the remark last week in a hospitality suite in front of the TV show's presenter Adrian Chiles, the comedian Jo Brand and a senior charity worker from Comic Relief. The remark was overheard and reported. The following day an executive producer spoke to Ms Thatcher, prompting an email apology, but she has refused to make a public apology.

Ms Hunt also rejected the explanation that Ms Thatcher's use of the term "golliwog" had been made in private and was meant as a joke. "She still maintains that this was a comment made in jest," she said. "We have ascertained subsequently from the people who were party to that conversation that by nobody's reckoning could it be deemed to have been used in a jokey fashion."

The controller added: "This is not her working in a private space and she was not in the pub with her friends. She was sitting in a BBC green room on BBC premises surrounded by a diverse production team on The One Show speaking to a BBC-booked guest, a BBC-booked celebrity and in the presence of a senior production worker from Comic Relief. In those circumstances she was effectively operating in a workplace."

Last night there were further suggestions that Ms Thatcher had in fact used the term on more than one occasion but there was no official confirmation from her agent. Although sacked from The One Show, Ms Thatcher is still employed by the BBC on a number of other projects, including a radio show on her mother which she is currently recording.

Earlier in the week Ms Thatcher's agent said a member of the BBC had leaked the story because the corporation had a vendetta against the family name. In response the BBC said that at least 12 people, including journalists, were in the room at the time the comments were made and that the story could have come from any one of them.

Many critics of the BBC have been quick to compare the corporation's treatment of Ms Thatcher to that of Jonathan Ross, who was suspended, not sacked, for making obscene phone calls during a radio show with Russell Brand. But yesterday race campaigners spoke out in support of BBC bosses, pointing out that Ross had made a number of full and public apologies. "As far as I am concerned this was no private conversation," said Darcus Howe, a broadcaster and long standing race campaigner. "This was a statement made at a place of work surrounded by people she worked with.

"I also cannot abide by the suggestion that she was somehow making a joke. So many times we've come across white people who try to explain away the use of these words as being harmless jokes, but it's over. These words are simply no longer acceptable as jokes."

Sabby Dalhu, a spokeswoman for the National Assembly Against Racism, said Britain's black community had never seen the term "golliwog" as a jokey, more acceptable form of racism. "Letting people get away with light-hearted racism lets real racists think it is OK to use the much harsher terms," she said. "Racism is racism."

Post a Comment

View all comments that have been posted about this article.

Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.

Comments

Name calling
[info]bardor wrote:
Friday, 6 February 2009 at 02:51 am (UTC)
How is it that black people think it is alright for them to call the white people "Honky''? And the Dogooders also never c omment on it either!
Where has all this "political Correct" crap come from?? I am presently living in the "land of the free" but you could be forgiven if you thought it was another third World country!! You just cannot speak your mind anywhere because of the dogooders who seem to stick their noses in everything. I am in my 81 st year and I say to you that I am glad that I am not starting out in life.
Oh, how I miss the 'Good Old Days'. You have to be careful to not be heard calling the people BLACK, They are now ( politically) African Americans!! But aren't they black?
!
Re: Name calling
[info]tomasoq wrote:
Friday, 6 February 2009 at 06:18 am (UTC)
The 'good old days' of Jim Crow right?

Maybe you'd like to bring back slavery as well, yes?

Carol Thatcher should know that calling a black person a Golliwog is deeply offensive to most decent people. She mistakenly thought the people in the room were as racist as she is but it blew up in her face. Would she have said what she said if Mike Tyson or Barack Obama had been in the room? I doubt it.

Adrian Chiles and Jo Brand were right to challenge her and the BBC was right to back them up.

Re: Name calling
[info]artstaristic wrote:
Friday, 6 February 2009 at 06:29 am (UTC)
There are no decent people only sinners!!! You live in your self righteous world but lets call a spade a spade. It was this country that first took the steps to abolish slavery!
Re: Name calling
[info]marylondon_09 wrote:
Friday, 6 February 2009 at 11:06 am (UTC)
To artstaristic -

Oh how righteous of you,

Are you saying that because Britain was the first country that took steps to abolish slavery that its okay for you to call a black person a golliwog.

The mass exodus of people from their homeland to a foreign land where they were treated like animals and families and nations broken is nothing to you. Because as far as you are concerned the fact Britain took the first steps to abolish slavery - means that calling someone a golliwog is okay.

Well thank sir -

The good thing about what Carol said is that it unearths closet racists like you!
Re: Name calling
[info]marylondon_09 wrote:
Friday, 6 February 2009 at 04:29 pm (UTC)
You first need to think of how it was like growing up as black person in the 60's before you question why in your words the 'wogs' did not protest.

Let?s first establish the dictionary meaning of golliwog - A doll fashioned in grotesque caricature of a Black male.
Also the imagery and concept of Golliwog was produced during a time when racism was blatant in the UK and United States.

This word is implicated in racist discourse and it has associations with a time when it was acceptable to poke fun at images of black people.

Lets not forget that books containing golliwog were removed from public libraries because of how offensive they were.

In school, I did have kids referring to me as a golliwog which was rude and racist. So I am offended when people trivialise issues like this and pretend that history never happened.

We need to look at the representation of this object and the social and political landscape in which it's imagery was produced to fully understand why people would take offence.

Mr Bardor - ignorance is not a defence for racism - and you ask what has she done that deserves the sack. It is her total disregard for the offence caused and her failure to apologise.

She says it was a joke and that it was meant to be funny. I would like to ask Carol Thatcher what is so funny about calling someone a golliwog ? I personally challenge you to explain what part of that is funny.
Re: Name calling
[info]amelia1 wrote:
Friday, 6 February 2009 at 05:18 pm (UTC)
Is it possible that people are angry that Carol Thatchers off air comment was badly handled by the BBC? After all, offence comes in many forms and Jonathan Ross's broadcast comments were equally as offensive and he just got suspended. The difference is that Carol Thatcher isn't as high profile or tied into an expensive contract with the BBC and is therefore expendible. Isn't that a form of discrimination in itself? I also don't think anybodys best interests were served by Jay Hunts prissy patronising ("I tried to get her to understand...."). It just gets peoples backs up. And don't forget, people of all races are capable (and guilty) of racism.
Re: Name calling - Amelia
[info]marylondon_09 wrote:
Friday, 6 February 2009 at 05:37 pm (UTC)
Speak for your self.

I have experienced racism, my parents have and so have my children.

Due to Carol Thatcher re-introduction of this word, my niece was taunted on her way back from school by a group of boys calling her 'golliwog'.

If you do not understand something then I suggest you go and read about British history, so that you understand how the word and its image came to become a symbol of racial insensitivity.

Racism or not - it is disrespectful and Carol failure to apologise shows how deep rooted her prejudice is.

Re: Name calling - Amelia
[info]amelia1 wrote:
Friday, 6 February 2009 at 10:15 pm (UTC)
I understand perfectly, however you appear to have missed the point completely. The issue of the term golliwog wasn't part of my response, but you appear determined that it should have been. If you don't understand something the first time round, read it again.
Re: Name calling - Amelia
[info]marylondon_09 wrote:
Saturday, 7 February 2009 at 02:31 pm (UTC)
You are right I don't understand what you're saying. The issue that is being discussed is the fact that Carol was sacked for her failure to apologise for using an offensive word in front of 12 other colleagues. Some of whom objected - for their own reasons. If I too was in the room or I was working with Carol and she said this - I would also ask her to apologise and would be offended by this remark.
Her failure to apologise shows for disrespect for her colleagues and that is why she was sacked. I would not put up with racism at work, or people using archaic racist language that belongs in the past.
To your comment about - "people of all races are capable (and guilty) of racism". What has that got to do with anything? We all know that people are capable of racism ? what is your point??
Of all the words in the world to use, why did she choose this one to describe the tennis player ? also the most important thing is that the person in question (the tennis player) since hearing of this abuse has said that he is deeply offended and finds it racist.
If the BBC were to ignore Carol?s blatant disregard for the offence caused then they too would be implicated in the racist slur.
Re: Name calling
[info]bardor wrote:
Friday, 6 February 2009 at 02:30 pm (UTC)
Bring back slavery?What a claver responce!!
I remember when we had Jam with a Golliwog on the label and I did not hear a word of protest from the people who, in those days, were regarded as 'Wogs. Nor from the "Dogooders" either. But what has that to do with this lady getting sacked?? I also remember how it was for the German people rightup to 1939. What had they lost? Freedom of speech!!!Is that what the peo-ple who have replied to my comments want for us now? .
Re: Name calling
[info]marylondon_09 wrote:
Friday, 6 February 2009 at 09:13 am (UTC)
We can not run away from the fact that in Britain there is a history of racism, blacks were enslaved, treated like second class citizens and mocked.

The golliwog was produced during these times and was implicated in racial slur and mockery. Because you were priviledged enough to grow up in a world where you have never been looked at as a second class citizen or discriminated against because of your colour. Then you can easily dimiss how offensive the word is.

If you do not understand the context that the image and its imagery was created - then please shut up
Re: Name calling
[info]bardor wrote:
Friday, 6 February 2009 at 02:56 pm (UTC)
How did this person get my email address? I understood that My comments would be Anonymous??
Re: Name calling
[info]marylondon_09 wrote:
Saturday, 7 February 2009 at 02:37 pm (UTC)

Well said!
Re: Name calling
[info]36590 wrote:
Saturday, 7 February 2009 at 02:15 pm (UTC)
You would think that someone who has survived for 81 years would have learned how pernicious the use of racist labels has been. Refraining from the use of discriminatory language is not "political correct", it's what used to be common decency- or Christian, another label people like you are fond of throwing out there without knowing its meaning.
The last time I heard someone use the word "honky" was probably in the 70's, and it just didn't have the same sting as golliwog, or that other even harsher word that I'm sure you're more familiar with hearing and using. When your own race has the majority of power and prestige in your country, those kinds of terms just don't have the same effect on your self-esteem.
I live in the U.S. also, and we have much better ways to practice our freedom than by insulting people because of their outward appearance.
By the way, "they" are not black in color, but many different shades of brown from pale to dark. Just as whites are not white, but many colors from dark tan to pale pink. Silly that complicated creatures like humans should be categorized by such a superficial quality.
term golliwog is racist
[info]bellaragaza wrote:
Friday, 6 February 2009 at 05:47 am (UTC)
BBC were right to sack this woman, racism is racism and is unacceptable. The way she refused to make a public apology implies that she sees herself as superior to black people and nobody is superior to anybody - every body is born equal and will die equal. What worries me is the number of people who called BBC COMPLAINING she was sacked, diminishing what she did. Does it mean racism is so acceptable in Britain and people actually think they have the right to abuse others so they see nothing wrong with some others abusing black people?

This is very dangerous thinking because if people accept mild racism what else do they accept? Like the saying goes, first they came for the Blacks but I'm not Black so I said nothing. Then they came for the Jews and the Irish but I'm neither so I said nothing. And when they came for me there was nobody left to say anything.

People condoning any form of racism and prejudice should be careful as they could be next.
golliwog
[info]artstaristic wrote:
Friday, 6 February 2009 at 06:23 am (UTC)
Years ago, my wife had a golliwog that had belonged to her mother and had been passed down over about a hundred years. She loved her golliwog so much and then one day I left the bedroom door open and the dog got in. Seeing this lovely toy on the pillow was too much too resist. I came in from the garden and upon discovering this terrible accident spent the next two hours trying to sow the handknitted doll back together. That day was a day to remember. My sowing has never been one of my greatest talents! I never considered myself racist and I have never persecuted anybody for the colour of their skin.I always enjoyed the musical skill of those wonderful musicians such as Duke Ellington, and Otis Redding and I am somewhat of an expert on Carolina and the Piedmont blues, being a musician myself. However what black people did to my mother cannot be put on this page and what young blacks did to me over the last twenty five years has come up before the very throne of heaven itself and already judgement has fallen on some! As required under christian doctrine I forgave all I could. I have suffered racism as a white englishman from the Irish and from the Blackman for the last 30 years. but I have also suffered persecution from my own, You are self righteous hypocrites who strain out a gnat and swallow a camel! The world has become so small that the radius of the planet can be travelled in 4 hours or less! Those who are employed in the media are under so much strain to do their job properly If I were to let fly you really would hear comments that would make you want to curl up in a ball and die! I have been told by black men that there is nothing more pleasurable than that they see an englishman tortured and I was shown video of two blacks raping white men and when I was driven to attempted suicide in a mental institution a black nurse raped a white girl patient and then went to Jamaica for a holiday! God have mercy on the Irish and the black(But not too much!). The paradox is, that by highlighting Thatchers remark you are being more racist than if it were just forgotten about! Who cares, really? The bible says pay no regard to the names that people call you and bless those that curse you! Of course if Thatcher wants to put herself in the position where she can be attacked that is up to her! Personally I shut the door and watch and pray! Down down down into a ring fire, down down down and the flames getting higher!
Golliwog
[info]dinerouk wrote:
Friday, 6 February 2009 at 06:33 am (UTC)
I would dearly like to hear the context and manner in which it was said, before I judge her.
One can not erase the golliwog from history, as though it never existed. And if it existed, then people must be allowed to refer to it, provided it's in a non-hurtful or racist manner. Some people appear to be saying that the word should not be used in ANY circumstances!
Carol Thatcher
[info]petey1951 wrote:
Friday, 6 February 2009 at 07:24 am (UTC)
I don't defend her use of the term but the point is here,we do not know what was said or in which context.The truth doesn't matter these days it seems.
I really really object to the action the BBC has taken..publishing a remark which was made off and away from camera and thus shocking and offending huge numbers of people including myself,a white middle class individual from the home counties
[info]explodingbadger wrote:
Friday, 6 February 2009 at 08:49 am (UTC)
"How is it that black people think it is alright for them to call the white people "Honky''? And the Dogooders also never c omment on it either!"

Well most black people don't call white people Honky outside 1970s Blacksploitation movies . And those "do gooders" (ie those who find racism offensive) might not comment on it because it is white people
who have been the abusers and black people and other races who have been at the sharp end of slavery, colonialism and our latest slaughter in Iraq and Afganistan.
Thatcher
[info]johnnynorfolk wrote:
Friday, 6 February 2009 at 08:49 am (UTC)
The issue he should be talking about is the different standards of the BBC. Why does Ross who caused such offence ON AIR possibly broke the law have a 3 month ban. Against Thatcher who made an offensive remark to some by using a word IN PRIVATE be sacked.

Its just not consistant

I accept that some words and phrases are now offencive I understand that. But those same people who are offended should remember that we used these words every day in the past as just part of our normal life. Not as racist comments but just words we had grown up with. In Thatchers case I would describe her as careless not offensive in this case. Younger people who have been drilled in the equality topic should remember that older people have not, and we do not have the same horror of such words.I think we are more tollerant of such things where as today people are so easily offended.

Re: Thatcher
[info]amelia1 wrote:
Friday, 6 February 2009 at 10:55 pm (UTC)
I agree about the Jonathan Ross ban....the reason he only got a 3 month suspension is that he has a high profile and the BBC were tied into an expensive contract. Why doesn't Jay Hunt come out and admit they got rid of her because they could. If they didnt sack Ross they shouldnt have sacked Thatcher. It's so unfair (although to be honest I'd be pleased not to see either of them on TV).
Carol Thatcher
[info]dgbxiphion wrote:
Friday, 6 February 2009 at 09:02 am (UTC)
I am appalled that the BBC has seen it fit to remove Carol from her reporting role. She is a lively reporter who unlike some on BBC (Ross & Brand in particular) does not cause offence. It is time the BBC grew up and did not follow the pc brigade who apparently tolerant bad language but refuses to understand that many in our community consider golliwog just a toy and not representative of a black person. I have spoken to a number of black people and they too think the BBC has gone well over the top.
Sort yourself out BBC and return to reality. If you had had the nerve to remove J Ross & Brand permanently then you would have had my and many others full support.
I vote for the return of Carol who injects life into a good show.
Re: Carol Thatcher
[info]guiglioni wrote:
Friday, 6 February 2009 at 09:35 am (UTC)
As I think this report makes very clear, the reason that Thatcher was given the boot was because of her refusal to admit that was she said was wrong and offer a full apology.

Nobody is suggesting that she is guilty of Nazi warcrimes for the things she said, but she should be woman enough to realise that her comment was inappropriate and clearly offensive.

And johnnynorfolk, I'm afraid that just because something was commonplace in the past, that doesn't mean it is acceptable now. Nor that it ever was.
carol thatcher
[info]jbeneben wrote:
Friday, 6 February 2009 at 09:06 am (UTC)
carol thatcher refuses to apologise because she truly has no respect for the feelings of others and probably moves in a circle of peers who use such language in their normal mode of conversation. Furthermore, she has no fear of real repercussions as she would have if she had insulted Islam for example, I am sure in that case she would have been quick to apologise unreservedly for causing offensive even in jest. To be quite honest the woman comes across as a buffoon anyway, which actually is more insulting when a buffoon has the audacity to make fun of others.
Who ?
[info]humble_sparrow wrote:
Friday, 6 February 2009 at 09:24 am (UTC)
Who is this lady, never heard of her, whats a celeb, no idea, and what's this 'One Show' thingamejig ?

Thought I was a reasonably aware person but am completely lost here.

Can anyone help me ?

RE: Name Calling
[info]beaye wrote:
Friday, 6 February 2009 at 09:34 am (UTC)
This is just another opportunity for everyone to show THEY are not racist... Instead of doing it by actually mixing with a diverse group of people, it's much easier to just witchhunt someone else for using a word.... A WORD....
It's situations like this that give power to words.
Intention is everything, expression is nothing....

@*%* everyone : )
Re: Name Calling
[info]brummyboy wrote:
Friday, 6 February 2009 at 10:27 am (UTC)
There is so much wrong with this whole situation, it beggars belief. Firstly, apart from the main protagonists, no one actually knows what was said, so noone apart from them is actually in a position to acurately comment. Whilst I understand that the term"golliwog" may be offensive to some, everyone knows what the doll looks like, and if Ms Thatcher was using this as a similie, then this is a statement to convey an image, not an intended insult. Secondly, the comment was said in a private conversation. If those party to the conversation were offended, surely they are big enough personalities that they should confront Ms Thatcher with their unhappiness of the offensive statement. Thirdly, the double standards of the BBC are astounding. Jonathan Ross broadcasts a crude and insulting program to the nation, gets a slap on the wrist and a three month "holiday" because he gave the required apology. I would question the sincerity of his apology as immediately on his return he is making jokes about having sex with OAPs. Carol Thatcher is immediately sacked as she refuses to make the required BBC apology, although, according to her agent, she has offered a "fulsome" apology.

I feel I am quite broad minded, however, there are still lots of things on TV and radio I find offensive, however, I do not jump up and down and scream "racist", "ageist", "sizeist" every time this happens. I think this country needs to stop being so precious and concerned about offending some group or other (race, religion, wieght, age, etc) and just get on with life!

BBC
[info]1englishhammer wrote:
Friday, 6 February 2009 at 10:00 am (UTC)
BBC....yet another nail in your coffin, I have more respect for channel 5 than the BBC and anyone who "complained" about the gollywog remark. You're scum....simple as that.
Carol Thatcher
[info]graham_18 wrote:
Friday, 6 February 2009 at 10:03 am (UTC)
If I thought that Mr Chiles and Ms Brand, both of whom appear to me to be self righteous, were to be honest and admit that they couldn't wait to take revenge on any "Thatcher" that they came in contact with, I'd respect them more. I suspect that the truth is that it is an agest issue whereby people of a certain age do not consider a golliwog to be related to a black person but look on it a s a toy, in my case made for me by my mother. When I was young I didn't kick him or beat him but loved it ( it wasn't a he or she) and wouldn't go to bed until it was settled beside me. Years later hen I left home it left with me now as a reminder of my mother's love and it remains in my sock drawer to this day.
I suppose that Mr Chiles and Ms Brand would like to rewrite history, have all people who owned a golly sacked, assume my mother to be racist, and come and raid my house to liberate poor golly. Would they love hom or destry him?
Re name calling
[info]ptstroud wrote:
Friday, 6 February 2009 at 10:17 am (UTC)
I listened to Ms Hunt on the Today programme and frankly she sounded like Yvette Cooper, Caroline Flint and Dawn Primarolo rolled into one. Shrill and school maamish. Kept saying that people who overheard the remark were 'hugely' offended. But if the remark was made in front of only twelve people, as Jay Hunt said, why is there a need for a public apology. After all it was not Carol Thatcher who leaked the business to the press. Surely the email apology was quite sufficient.

More than likely the whole business is because Carol is Margaret Thatcher's daughter and that rankles the array of pinkies who inhabit the upper ranks of the Beeb. The corporation has become more and more PC ever since it was told that it employed too many 'Honkies.'

I will not be watching the One Show again for a long time.
Gollywog
[info]the_surreyman wrote:
Friday, 6 February 2009 at 10:49 am (UTC)
I find it extremely offensive that I am being dictated to by these politically correct people who seem hell bent on just finding any reason to project themselves into the media. I grew up in the 1940's and went to bed cuddling my favorite Gollywog. I had Robertsons jam with a Gollywog on the label and also sent away for my Gollywog badge. Now these idiot do gooders are saying I'm offensive if I use the word Gollywog. Well I'm sorry but if someone is so thin skinned that they are offended by a word then that is their problem. I've been called far worse in my life but I'm mature enough just to laugh off any intended insult. As for the BBC expecting someone to apologise and then sacking them I feel they have gone too far. Why do they want a public apology? If someone who actually heard the remark was genuinely offended then it is fair enough for that person to be man enough to stand up and say they are offended and receive a personal apology. I'm afraid people like Jay Hunt and their ilk at the BBC are actually far more offensive to the vast majority of people in this country. GET A LIFE AND WORRY ABOUT LIFES REAL PROBLEMS.
Not welcome at home
[info]bigbrummied wrote:
Friday, 6 February 2009 at 11:06 am (UTC)
I am as British as the next person, but as a mixed raced (B&W) man I find this whole Thatcher row very hard to understand. Furthermore it just makes me feel unwelcome in my own country.
I was born and breed in Birmingham, but for the past 38 years incidents like this make me feel like an alien.
Like Mr Darcus Howe I am so tired of hearing white people come out with excuse after excuse, when all I ask for is some understanding. The word is offensive to me and so are the excuses.
I know this will be like water off a duck's back to a lot of people, but thankfully there are a lot of white people that understand where I'm coming from. To these people I will be forever grateful as you keep me from going insane.
[info]comradius wrote:
Friday, 6 February 2009 at 11:25 am (UTC)
If it's Carol Thatcher's opinion that a black tennis player looks like a golliwog then, however stupid that opinion may be, I think she should have the right to say it, both publicly and privately, so that we can all freely assess how much of an idiot she is.

Imagine for a moment a world in which nobody is allowed to cause offence. Whatever you think of Carol Thatcher (who I think looks rather like Jimmy Saville in drag-- come on, who's offended?), we (if there's any humanity left in us whatsoever) should resist any attempt to get us to self-censor in the name of "tolerance" because that, Comrades, is the road to utter totalitarianism.
Ava Gobac
[info]avagobac wrote:
Friday, 6 February 2009 at 11:29 am (UTC)
I have been a golliwog for most of my adult life. I don't find the term offensive: in fact, most people hardly dare acknowledge that I exist! I would be offended, however, if someone called me a Thatcher...
Racism etc.
[info]trwyddedair wrote:
Friday, 6 February 2009 at 11:42 am (UTC)
Surely it is all about how much experience you have had. I was brought up with many disabled people, so do not find them embarrassing, which many people do, and they don't know how to treat them. Sometimes speaking to them as if they are idiots. Then I went to a school in 1945 which had 28 nationalities, including a German boy and a Polish boy who had been in Dacow Concentration camp Others were black, asian, white, and mixed. There was no discrimination of any sort there. Not surprisingly perhaps as a teacher I taught children with a range of difficulties in Inner London. Negative comments about others are not something I need to express.
Let's face it being Mrs Thatcher's daughter must have its own range of problems, so I don't even feel the need to denigrate her even more. Hopefully she will realise just how much she has let herself (and her mother) down. I can understand therefore why she feels the need to refuse to apologise, she is maintaining her stance. What a sad, sad, sad person she is, and much to be pitied.
carol Thatcher
[info]jamietommo wrote:
Friday, 6 February 2009 at 11:50 am (UTC)
To whom It may concern
The whole episode was blown out of prportion by Jo Brand, Who is the most ignorant and hipocritical person I have ever listened to, just trying to look good, I think it is a witchunt and should not be publicised, it's all just for show anyway J Thomson Somerset
Name Calling
[info]hunny123 wrote:
Friday, 6 February 2009 at 12:17 pm (UTC)
I think it is preposterous firing Carol about this - I am a staunch anti-racist and often have lots to say to people about their unthinking, ignorant, racist comments, however, I believe Carol Thatcher should have had someone "say a word or two" in private to say it is unacceptable - the comments were made in private and not on air.

I believe the comments were (although my sources are not necessarily correct) "he reminds me of a golliwog" this is not calling him a golliwog. Stupid thing to say but not that offensive.

This is not political correctness gone mad this is just over-reaction - racism and racist comments are un-acceptable in any walk of life and people need to know that - however, because ignorant people do not pay attention to what comes out of their mouths- mistakes are made - once again - in the same vein as Manuelgate, it is the press that has blown it all out of proportion and caused the controversy, this should never have been given column inches.
Can't resist a dig
[info]bigbrummied wrote:
Friday, 6 February 2009 at 12:20 pm (UTC)
To jamietommo

What a surprise you think this way.

It reminds me of a girl I once went out with. She came to my home and one of the first comments she made was "nice wog box", referring to my stereo.
When I challenged her on this her reply was "that what we call them in Somerset"
This was around 10 years ago, so I glad to see this haven't changed much down there :-).

Most popular