Jones & Anr (Administrators of Estate of Balls Deceased) v Inland Revenue Commrs; ChD (Lightman J) 14 February 1997.
The administrators of an estate were not entitled to claim relief under ch IV, pt 6 of the Inheritance Tax Act 1984. The word "sold" in s 191 of the Act meant conveyed or transferred on completion of sale, and although the administrators had entered into a contract for the sale of the pro- perty it had never completed. The value of the property for the purposes of inheritance tax was, therefore, the probate value.
David Parry (Ellison & Co, Colchester) for the plaintiffs; Michael Furness (IR Solicitor) for the Crown.
U v W (A-G intervening); FD; (Wilson J) 19 Feb 1997.
An application by the mother of twins for a declaration of non-genetic paternity was dismissed. The parties had received fertilisation treatment in Italy and had been "treated together" for the purposes of s 28 of the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 1990. Although the treatment had been provided outside the UK by a doctor who was not, for the purposes of s 28, a person to whom a licence applied, s 28(3), which was prima facie restrictive of the freedom to provide services under art 59 of the EEC Treaty, did not infringe art 59.
David Vaughan QC, Barbara Hewson (Kitsons) for the applicant; Timothy Scott QC, Paul Storey (Tozers) for the respondent; Nicholas Paines (DSS Solicitor) for the Attorney-General.
Jubilee Recreation Centre Ltd v Customs & Excise Commrs; QBD (Lightman J) 6 March 1997.
Building work carried out on a protected building was zero-rated for VAT, since the building was used as a sports centre "similarly" to a village hall for the benefit of the local community, which included people working in the area as well as residents.
Andrew Hitchmough (McKenna & Co) for the taxpayer; Michael Kent QC (C & E) for the Crown.Reuse content