‘Persecution mania’ may have played a part in Nigella Lawson and Charles Saatchi’s marriage breakdown, says Maurice Saatchi
Lord Saatchi reveals some of the reasons that led to his brother’s divorce from TV chef
Sunday 08 September 2013
Tory peer Lord Saatchi has suggested that “persecution mania” may have played a part in the high-profile breakdown of his brother Charles’s relationship with celebrity chef Nigella Lawson.
Asked about their divorce in an interview, Lord (Maurice) Saatchi declined to talk about the pair in person, offering only a vague answer about the complexities of marriage.
“There are many aspects of human life, let’s consider them – persecution mania, love, sex, marriage, work. These are all areas which produce great difficulties in people, and family and marriage is certainly one of the most complex areas,” he told BBC1’s Andrew Marr Show.
Lord Saatchi said it was “impossible” for anyone outside a marriage to know what is going on between a couple. Referring to his late wife, the author Josephine Hart, he added: “As Iris Murdoch said to Josephine Hart on many occasions, marriage is a private place.
“What Iris Murdoch was saying or suggesting was that it’s impossible for anybody, even the best friends or relatives of the people involved, to know what really happens between a man and a woman.
“When somebody installs CCTV in people’s bedrooms, which may be the next step of our surveillance state, then we’ll have the answer but until then we don’t know.”
Millionaire art collector Charles Saatchi and Ms Lawson were granted a decree nisi – the first legal step to ending their 10-year marriage – at a hearing at London’s High Court in July. Ms Lawson applied to divorce Saatchi on the grounds of his continuing unreasonable behaviour.
Pictures were published in June showing Mr Saatchi holding his wife by the throat as they had an argument on the terrace of a restaurant.
He dismissed the incident as “a playful tiff” but then accepted a police caution for assault. Mr Saatchi later said that the pictures gave a “wholly different and incorrect implication”.
- 1 Howard Jacobson: Let’s see the 'criticism' of Israel for what it really is
- 3 Gingers face extinction due to climate change, scientists warn
Sustained immigration has not harmed Britons' employment, say government advisers
British jihadist calls for 'flag of Islam' over Downing Street and Buckingham Palace
Australia facing international condemnation after turning around Sri Lankans at sea
7/7 memorial defaced on anniversary of 2005 attacks with ‘Blair lied thousands died’ graffiti
Even when it brutalises one of its own teenage citizens, America is helpless against Israel
There’s a nasty smell in the political air – and it’s coming from the Tories
On Application: Council of Europe: The European Court of Human Rights’s judgme...
£28000 - £32000 per annum: Charter Selection: A professional services company ...
£400 - £450 per day: Orgtel: Project Manager (PM), Key Banking Client, Retail ...
£45000 - £55000 Per Annum: The Green Recruitment Company: The Green Recruitmen...